MatchTrustedPeer ignores the public key used, leading to forged CA clones passing verification. Affected builds are any that enable the macro WOLFSSL_TRUST_PEER_CERT and load CA certificates with wolfSSL_CTX_trust_peer_cert() or wolfSSL_trust_peer_cert(). The peer must know the certificates being loaded to either of those APIs to take advantage of the issue. When OPENSSL_COMPATIBLE_DEFAULTS is also defined this widens the affected API to include all CA certificate loading. Both macros are defined when using autoconf builds such as (nginx, haproxy, stunnel, wpas, apache httpd, hitch, bind, rsyslog, ffmpeg, all, distro). When the certificate is listed as a trusted peer certificate the issue previously allowed for a malicious (D)TLS server to bypass authentication once knowing which CA’s the client would accept. This also affects mutual authentication cases where the client knows which CA’s the server has loaded. If building with any of these configurations and using (D)TLS where the loaded CA’s could be known and authentication of the peer is desired, users should either: update to the latest wolfSSL version, apply the fix patch, or use the configure flag --disable-openssl-compatible-defaults and not load CA’s with wolfSSL_CTX_trust_peer_cert() or wolfSSL_trust_peer_cert() to mitigate the issue.
CVE-2026-93302
Score 8.2 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-09-27. NVD baseline CVSS 8.2; sources differ by 0.0.
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
An upstream fix is merged but not yet released — mitigate (WAF / firewall / segmentation) until the release ships, then apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 8.2
- EG Score
- 8.2HIGHhigh confidence
- EG Risk
- 37EG Risk 37/100CISA SSVC
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity82% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%CISA SSVC: Track at every mission impact level.Action: An upstream fix is merged but not yet in a tagged release. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines until it ships, then apply the release. - EPSS PROB
- 0.2%
- EPSS %ILE
- 9th
- KEV
- Not listed
CISA SSVCTrack at every mission impact level.
An upstream fix is merged but not yet in a tagged release. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines until it ships, then apply the release.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table
Published
September 27, 2026
Last Modified
October 2, 2026
Advisory Details (1)
Auto-updated Sep 27, 2026commit 22bcd51d553e (wolfSSL/wolfssl)
Fix landed in wolfSSL/wolfssl commit 22bcd51d553e — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl/commit/22bcd51d553eaac1de37bee91fdac80cc47961e1Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-93302(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 33× in last 7d / 36× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-10-04 04:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-03 17:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-03 17:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-03 06:10 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-03 06:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-02 19:00 UTCEG score recompute▼ 0.10
- 2026-10-02 19:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-02 18:59 UTCNVD updateCVSS v3 → 8.2
- 2026-10-02 12:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-02 01:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 01:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-01 19:51 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-01 14:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-01 03:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-30 16:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 16:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-30 04:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-29 17:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-29 17:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-29 16:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-29 16:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-29 07:59 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-29 07:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-28 20:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
Show 11 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-28 19:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 19:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-28 08:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-27 21:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 21:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-27 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-27 10:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 09:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 09:20 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-93302?
When was CVE-2026-93302 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-93302 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-93302?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-93302?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-93302
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-93302?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.