In wolfSSL versions 5.7.2 through 5.9.2 there is a client-side implementation flaw in RFC 6961, multiple OCSP response stapling, which can lead to certificate forgery. When a wolfSSL client enables OCSP stapling with the HAVE_CERTIFICATE_STATUS_REQUEST_V2 feature and calls wolfSSL_UseOCSPStaplingV2(ssl, WOLFSSL_CSR2_OCSP_MULTI, options), the client accepts any certificate in the peer's chain as a certificate authority without verifying that the certificate is actually authorized to act as one. This means that an attacker who possesses any certificate that chains to a CA trusted by the client (along with its private key) can forge certificates for arbitrary identities that will be accepted as valid by the client. The end entity certificate of the server is stored in the persistent trust store, affecting subsequent connections that reuse the context even when OCSP multi usage is not employed. Found by internal wolfSSL testing.
CVE-2026-89102
Score 6.5 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-09-27. NVD baseline CVSS 6.5; sources differ by 0.0.
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
An upstream fix is merged but not yet released — mitigate (WAF / firewall / segmentation) until the release ships, then apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 6.5
- EG Score
- 6.5MEDIUMhigh confidence
- EG Risk
- 29EG Risk 29/100CISA SSVC
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity65% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%CISA SSVC: Track at every mission impact level.Action: An upstream fix is merged but not yet in a tagged release. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines until it ships, then apply the release. - EPSS PROB
- 0.2%
- EPSS %ILE
- 6th
- KEV
- Not listed
CISA SSVCTrack at every mission impact level.
An upstream fix is merged but not yet in a tagged release. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines until it ships, then apply the release.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table
Published
September 27, 2026
Last Modified
September 30, 2026
Advisory Details (1)
Auto-updated Sep 27, 2026Fixes for OCSP stapling, cert manager, and certificate_status_request_v2 handling
Fix merged in wolfSSL/wolfssl PR #11027 on 2026-08-04 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl/pull/11027Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-89102(2)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 31× in last 7d / 34× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-10-03 14:35 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-03 14:35 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 14:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-02 15:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 15:45 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 15:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-01 19:51 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-01 17:00 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-01 17:00 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 17:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-30 17:47 UTCEG score recompute▼ 1.80
- 2026-09-30 17:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-30 17:44 UTCNVD updateCVSS v3 → 6.5 · severity → MEDIUM
- 2026-09-30 16:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 16:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-30 04:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-29 17:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-29 17:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-29 16:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-29 16:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-29 07:48 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-29 07:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-28 20:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-28 19:17 UTCEG score recompute
Show 9 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-28 19:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-28 08:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-27 21:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 21:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-27 10:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 09:35 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 09:35 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-89102?
When was CVE-2026-89102 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-89102 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-89102?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-89102?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-89102
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-89102?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.