wolfSSL versions 5.9.2 and earlier contain a flaw in the X.509 certificate validation logic where it fails to properly enforce NameConstraints extensions when there is an unconstrained CA tier between a name-constrained intermediate CA and the leaf certificate. wolfSSL incorrectly accepted certificates for hostnames they shouldn't be allowed to cover, due to a chain-walking state-machine bug that resets the validation state when encountering an intermediate without NameConstraints, thereby bypassing cryptographic delegation controls. This defect exists in the default build configuration that makes use of certificates where name constraint extensions are used. Thanks to Jack Lloyd, PathDiff, and Ben Smyth for reporting the issue.
CVE-2026-89133
Score 5.3 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-09-27. NVD baseline CVSS 5.3; sources differ by 0.0.
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
An upstream fix is merged but not yet released — mitigate (WAF / firewall / segmentation) until the release ships, then apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 5.3
- EG Score
- 5.3MEDIUMhigh confidence
- EG Risk
- 39EG Risk 39/100CISA SSVC
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity53% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability100% × 15%CISA SSVC: Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Action: An upstream fix is merged but not yet in a tagged release. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high until it ships, then apply the release. - EPSS PROB
- 0.1%
- EPSS %ILE
- 1st
- KEV
- Not listed
CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
An upstream fix is merged but not yet in a tagged release. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high until it ships, then apply the release.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table
Published
September 27, 2026
Last Modified
October 2, 2026
Advisory Details (1)
Auto-updated Sep 27, 2026Name Constraints cert chain walk
Fix merged in wolfSSL/wolfssl PR #10687 on 2026-07-01 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl/pull/10687Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-89133(2)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 23× in last 7d / 26× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-10-03 19:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-03 19:40 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 19:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-02 19:00 UTCEG score recompute▼ 1.00
- 2026-10-02 19:00 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 19:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-02 18:59 UTCNVD updateCVSS v3 → 5.3
- 2026-10-01 19:51 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-01 19:00 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 19:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-30 18:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 18:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-29 17:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-29 17:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-29 16:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-29 16:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-28 20:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 20:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-28 11:00 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 11:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-27 10:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 09:35 UTCEG score recompute
Show 1 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-27 09:35 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-89133?
When was CVE-2026-89133 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-89133 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-89133?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-89133?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-89133
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-89133?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.