An issue was discovered in the resolv gem before 0.7.2 for Ruby. Resolv::DNS::Resource.get_class, Resolv::DNS::Resource::Generic.create, and Resolv::DNS::SvcParam::Generic.create generate a new class for each unknown DNS resource record (type, class) pair, or each unknown SvcParamKey, encountered while decoding a response. Each generated class was permanently registered both as a constant on Resource (or SvcParam::Generic) and as an entry in a class-lookup hash (ClassHash), and thus the class remained reachable through that constant after the response was discarded. Type and class are each 16-bit values, and thus an attacker controlling DNS responses (a spoofed response, or a malicious or hijacked upstream DNS server) has roughly 2^32 distinct (type, class) pairs to choose from. A single response of a few hundred kilobytes carrying tens of thousands of distinct unknown types permanently grows process memory by tens of megabytes; repeated responses accumulate without bound and are never reclaimed by garbage collection, because the constant keeps each class alive. Any code path that calls Resolv::DNS::Message.decode on attacker-influenced DNS responses is affected. resolv is a default gem, and thus this is reachable from a plain Ruby installation without any additional dependency.
CVE-2026-80212
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
Score 7.5 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-08-27. A secondary CVSS source baseline 7.5; sources differ by 0.0.
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 7.5
- EG Score
- 7.5HIGHmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 49EG Risk 49/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity75% × 45%The EG Score, 7.5 of 10.Exploitation0.4% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 0.4%
- EPSS %ILE
- 32nd
- KEV
- Not listed
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
August 27, 2026
Last Modified
September 9, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Aug 27, 2026Security advisories: CVE-2026-80212 and CVE-2026-80213 | Ruby
https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2026/08/27/multiple-vulnerabilities-in-resolv/GitHub - ruby/resolv: A thread-aware DNS resolver library written in Ruby · GitHub
https://github.com/ruby/resolvVendor Advisories for CVE-2026-80212(13)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- RHSA-2026:72785Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: ruby security update
- RHSA-2026:73519Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: ruby:2.5 security update
- RHSA-2026:72485Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: ruby:3.3 security update
- RHSA-2026:72484Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: ruby:4.0 security update
- RHSA-2026:72427Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: ruby4.0 security update
- RHSA-2026:72286Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: ruby security, bug fix, and enhancement update
- RHSA-2026:72285Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: ruby:3.3 security update
- RHSA-2026:62563Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs Security Update
- +5 more
Patch Availability(12)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | ruby-0:3.3.12-15.el10_2 | 2026-10-02 | redhat |
| redhat | ruby:2.5-8100020260923114349.489197e6 | 2026-09-30 | redhat |
| redhat | ruby4.0-0:4.0.6-37.el10_2 | 2026-09-28 | redhat |
| redhat | ruby:4.0-9080020260909091105.9 | 2026-09-28 | redhat |
| redhat | ruby:3.3-9080020260909091103.9 | 2026-09-28 | redhat |
| redhat | ruby-0:3.0.7-168.el9_8 | 2026-09-28 | redhat |
| redhat | ruby:3.3-8100020260909091101.489197e6 | 2026-09-28 | redhat |
| redhat | ruby3-3-main-3.3.10-23.6.hum1 | 2026-09-02 | redhat |
| redhat | ruby4-0-main-4.0.6-37.3.hum1 | 2026-09-02 | redhat |
| redhat | ruby3-4-main-3.4.10-31.6.hum1 | 2026-08-21 | redhat |
| redhat | ruby3-3-main-3.3.10-23.5.hum1 | 2026-08-21 | redhat |
| redhat | ruby4-0-main-4.0.6-37.2.hum1 | 2026-08-20 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 27× in last 7d / 153× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 247 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 147 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-10-13 06:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-13 06:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-13 06:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x2vh-ff4w-v64c · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-12 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-10-12 14:57 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 19:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 16:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-10-10 14:21 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-10 14:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x2vh-ff4w-v64c · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-10 01:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-10 01:56 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-10 01:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x2vh-ff4w-v64c · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-10-09 03:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-09 03:08 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 03:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x2vh-ff4w-v64c · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-10-08 01:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-08 01:21 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-08 01:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x2vh-ff4w-v64c · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-07 09:06 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-07 09:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x2vh-ff4w-v64c · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-06 20:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-06 20:42 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 20:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x2vh-ff4w-v64c · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-10-06 07:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-06 07:33 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 07:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x2vh-ff4w-v64c · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-10-05 16:54 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 16:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x2vh-ff4w-v64c · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-05 04:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-05 04:36 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 04:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x2vh-ff4w-v64c · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-10-04 15:58 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 15:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x2vh-ff4w-v64c · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-04 03:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 03:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x2vh-ff4w-v64c · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-03 15:14 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-03 15:14 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 15:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x2vh-ff4w-v64c · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-10-02 21:31 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 21:31 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 21:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x2vh-ff4w-v64c · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-02 17:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-10-02 09:08 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 09:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x2vh-ff4w-v64c · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-01 20:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-01 20:45 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 20:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x2vh-ff4w-v64c · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-10-01 08:13 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 08:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x2vh-ff4w-v64c · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-09-30 19:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 19:55 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 19:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x2vh-ff4w-v64c · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-09-30 05:04 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 05:04 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 05:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x2vh-ff4w-v64c · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-09-29 12:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-29 12:17 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-29 12:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x2vh-ff4w-v64c · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-09-28 21:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 21:17 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-28 21:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x2vh-ff4w-v64c · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-09-28 07:47 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-28 07:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x2vh-ff4w-v64c · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-09-27 19:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 19:29 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-27 19:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x2vh-ff4w-v64c · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-09-27 07:05 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-27 07:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x2vh-ff4w-v64c · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-09-26 18:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-26 18:46 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-26 18:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x2vh-ff4w-v64c · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-09-26 00:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-09-25 15:46 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-25 15:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x2vh-ff4w-v64c · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-09-25 02:51 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-25 02:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x2vh-ff4w-v64c · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-09-24 14:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-24 14:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-24 14:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x2vh-ff4w-v64c · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-09-24 02:07 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-24 02:07 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-24 02:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x2vh-ff4w-v64c · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
Related CVEs(same vendor + same CWE)
Same vendor
10 shownredhat:RHSA-2026:57565 · redhat:RHSA-2026:62562 · redhat:RHSA-2026:73519
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-80212?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-80212 published?
Is CVE-2026-80212 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-80212?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-80212?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-80212
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-80212?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.