CVE-2026-82562

LOWPre-NVD 3.73.7
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

This low-severity CVE scores 3.7 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.5% (43rd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from a secondary CVSS source
Sources: EPSS, a secondary CVSS source
Trending — 3 sources updated this weekElevated
3.7EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.5%CVSS: 3.7Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Fixed versions, as the CVE record's CNA (Harborist) states them: "Upgrade to qs 6.16.0 or later."

Summary

When qs.parse is called with comma: true and throwOnLimitExceeded: true, a comma-separated value under a bracket-push key (a[]=1,2,3,4) is split into an array without being compared against arrayLimit, while the same value under a flat key (a=1,2,3,4), an indexed key (a[0]=), a nested key (a[b]=), or a dotted key (a.b= with allowDots) throws the documented RangeError. A single parameter such as a[]=1,2,2,... therefore produces an inner array of arbitrary length even though the caller opted into the hard limit. This is the []= key form that the fix for CVE-2026-2391 (qs 6.14.2) did not cover.

Details

In lib/parse.js, a comma-separated value under a []= key is split and then wrapped as a single nested element (val = [val], so that each a[]=x,y group counts as one element of the outer array). The arrayLimit check that 6.14.2 added for comma values runs after that wrap, so for []= parts it only ever saw the wrapper of length 1. 6.15.3 added a pre-split comma count so that an oversized value throws before it is allocated, but gated it on an isFlatArrayValue flag that parseValues set to false for any part containing []=, and did not pass it for object-valued input, so the gap remained.

PoC

var qs = require('qs');

var options = { comma: true, arrayLimit: 3, throwOnLimitExceeded: true };

qs.parse('a=1,2,3,4', options); // RangeError: Array limit exceeded. Only 3 elements allowed in an array.

qs.parse('a[]=1,2,3,4', options); // { a: [ [ '1', '2', '3', '4' ] ] } (no throw)

qs.parse('a[]=' + '1,'.repeat(1000000) + '1', { comma: true, arrayLimit: 20, throwOnLimitExceeded: true });

// no throw; a 1,000,001-element inner array is allocated

Fix

lib/parse.js, applied in 8859c37 on main and released as v6.16.0: the isFlatArrayValue gate is removed, so every comma-split value is counted against arrayLimit before splitting regardless of key form. An in-limit group under a[]= still counts as one element of the outer array, and the default (throwOnLimitExceeded: false) path is unchanged.

Affected versions

>=6.14.2 <6.16.0, fixed in v6.16.0.

v6.14.2 introduced arrayLimit enforcement for comma values (the fix for CVE-2026-2391) but only for values not under a []= key, and every release from v6.14.2 through v6.15.3 has the same gap. v6.14.0 and v6.14.1, where throwOnLimitExceeded exists but does not apply to any comma form, are covered by CVE-2026-2391 rather than this record. Earlier lines (6.7.x through 6.13.x) have comma but no throwOnLimitExceeded, so there is no hard cap on any comma path to bypass; releases before 6.7.0 have no comma option.

Impact

An unauthenticated attacker who can reach an application that parses untrusted query strings or urlencoded bodies with both comma: true and throwOnLimitExceeded: true (both non-default) can bypass the configured limit with a single a[]= parameter and force the parser to allocate an array proportional to the request size. The cost is strictly linear in the attacker-supplied bytes (about 0.1 microseconds and 6 to 7 retained bytes per input byte; the same out-of-memory threshold as the documented default throwOnLimitExceeded: false path), so a transport-layer request or body size limit bounds it completely (and node's default maximum HTTP header size of 16 KB already bounds the request line, so multi-megabyte payloads need a body parser). The impact is that an opt-in hard limit fails open on one key spelling, not unbounded allocation from a small input.

CVSS v3
3.7
EG Score
3.7LOWmedium confidence
EG Risk
33
EG Risk 33/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity37% × 45%
The EG Score, 3.7 of 10.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.5%
EPSS %ILE
43rd
KEV
Not listed

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

August 29, 2026

Last Modified

September 3, 2026

Patch Availability(4)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatdevspaces/dashboard-rhel9:17891628842026-09-17redhat
redhatgrafana13-2-main-13.2.1-0.1.hum12026-09-03redhat
redhatgrafana13-1-main-13.1.3-0.4.hum12026-09-02redhat
redhatgrafana12-4-main-12.4.9-0.4.hum12026-08-29redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
node-qs6.11.0+ds+~6.9.7-3 ... 6.16.0+ds+~6.15.1-1 (9 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
node-qs6.13.0+ds+~6.9.16-1 ... 6.16.0+ds+~6.15.1-1 (7 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
node-qs6.13.0+ds+~6.9.16-1 ... 6.15.2+ds+~6.15.1-1 (6 versions)
  • every version up to 6.16.0+ds+~6.15.1-1: fixed in 6.16.0+ds+~6.15.1-1
—
npm(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
qs—
  • 6.14.2 up to 6.16.0: fixed in 6.16.0
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 13× in last 7d / 48× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 4 repeat rows among the latest 73 are merged into the row they repeat.

  1. 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  2. 2026-10-12 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  3. 2026-10-12 14:55 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-11 19:19 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-11 16:36 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-11 13:54 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  8. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  9. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  10. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  11. 2026-10-08 01:48 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-08 01:48 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  14. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  15. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  16. 2026-10-05 05:15 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-05 05:15 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  19. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  20. 2026-10-02 17:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  21. 2026-10-02 08:41 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-02 08:41 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  24. 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  25. 2026-09-29 12:09 UTCEG score recompute
Show 44 more
  1. 2026-09-29 12:09 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  3. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  4. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  5. 2026-09-26 15:33 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-09-26 15:33 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  8. 2026-09-23 18:11 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-09-23 18:11 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
  11. 2026-09-22 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
  12. 2026-09-21 21:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
  13. 2026-09-20 21:39 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-09-20 21:39 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
  16. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
  17. 2026-09-18 01:06 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-09-18 01:06 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
  20. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
  21. 2026-09-15 04:33 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-09-15 04:33 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-09-15 03:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
  24. 2026-09-12 08:00 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-09-12 08:00 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
  27. 2026-09-09 11:27 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-09-09 11:27 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
  30. 2026-09-06 14:54 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-09-06 14:54 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-09-06 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
  33. 2026-09-05 15:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
  34. 2026-09-04 05:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
  35. 2026-09-03 15:08 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
  37. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
  38. 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
  39. 2026-08-31 18:31 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-08-31 17:24 UTCEG score recompute
  41. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
  42. 2026-08-30 01:29 UTCEG score recompute
  43. 2026-08-30 00:25 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 3.7 LOW
  44. 2026-08-30 00:22 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-82562?
CVE-2026-82562 is a low-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on August 29, 2026. Summary When qs.parse is called with comma: true and throwOnLimitExceeded: true, a comma-separated value under a bracket-push key (a[]=1,2,3,4) is split into an array without being compared against arrayLimit, while the same value under a flat key (a=1,2,3,4), an indexed key (a[0]=), a nested key…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-82562 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-82562 was published on August 29, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of September 3, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-82562 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-82562 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.5% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (43rd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-82562?
CVE-2026-82562 has a CVSS base score of 3.7 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-82562?
A fix for CVE-2026-82562 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. Fixed versions, as the CVE record's CNA (Harborist) states them: "Upgrade to qs 6.16.0 or later." The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-82562 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-82562

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-82562?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.