PostCSS takes a CSS file and provides an API to analyze and modify its rules by transforming the rules into an Abstract Syntax Tree. In versions 8.5.11 and prior, the PreviousMap parses the /*# sourceMappingURL=PATH */ comment from any CSS string passed to process() and dereferences PATH against the local filesystem with no scheme, allowlist, or traversal check. An attacker who controls the CSS input can cause the host process to read any file readable by Node and leak the first ~10 bytes of its content through the resulting JSON.parse SyntaxError message. The bug also yields a precise file-existence oracle and a controllable-read primitive that may be combined with large-file targets for DoS. The behaviour is triggered with PostCSS's default options — no from, no map, no plugins required — and is therefore reachable from any pipeline that runs untrusted CSS through PostCSS (CMS themes, user-uploaded styles, browser-extension/userstyle processors, build pipelines for third-party packages, blog comment renderers, etc.). This issue has been fixed in version 8.5.12.
CVE-2026-45623
This critical-severity CVE scores 9.1 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 0.6% (47th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 9.1
- EG Score
- 9.1CRITICALmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 46EG Risk 46/100CISA SSVC
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity91% × 45%Exploitation1% × 40%Automatability30% × 15%CISA SSVC: Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 0.6%
- EPSS %ILE
- 47th
- KEV
- Not listed
CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation none (no KEV listing, exploit record or EPSS ≥ 50%) · Automatable unknown (not published for this CVE) · Technical impact total (CVSS ≥ 9.0). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table
Published
July 23, 2026
Last Modified
August 7, 2026
Advisory Details (1)
Auto-updated Sep 16, 2026Arbitrary file read and information disclosure via attacker-controlled sourceMappingURL in CSS comments · Advisory · postcss/postcss · GitHub
https://github.com/postcss/postcss/security/advisories/GHSA-6g55-p6wh-862qVendor Advisories for CVE-2026-45623(20)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- RHSA-2026:74609Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Cluster Observability Operator 1.5.3
- RHSA-2026:74503Red Hat Product SecurityCritical
Red Hat Security Advisory: Satellite 6.19.5 Async Update
- RHSA-2026:70587Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: OpenShift Container Platform 4.17.58 bug fix and security update
- RHSA-2026:67858Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: OpenShift Container Platform 4.15.69 bug fix and security update
- RHSA-2026:67838Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: OpenShift Container Platform 4.14.74 bug fix and security update
- RHSA-2026:67936Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: OpenShift Container Platform 4.16.71 bug fix and security update
- RHSA-2026:68755Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Technical preview of the satellite/iop-vulnerability-frontend-rhel9 container image
- RHSA-2026:68754Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces 3.30.1 Release.
- +12 more
Patch Availability(30)
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(5 across 5 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| node-postcss | 8.2.1+~cs5.3.23-8 ... 8.5.9+~cs9.3.30-1 (31 versions) |
| — |
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| node-postcss | 8.4.20+~cs8.0.23-1 ... 8.5.9+~cs9.3.30-1 (19 versions) |
| — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| node-postcss | 8.4.49+~cs9.2.32-1 ... 8.5.9+~cs9.3.30-1 (15 versions) |
| — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| node-postcss | 8.4.49+~cs9.2.32-1, 8.5.6+~cs9.3.28-1, 8.5.8+~cs9.3.30-1, 8.5.9+~cs9.3.30-1 |
| — |
npm(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| postcss | — |
| — |
Weakness Classification(2)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Additional Vendor Advisories
(17)
Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.
- Red HatRHSA-2026:54427MODERATE2026-07-27
RHSA-2026:54427 — Moderate
- Red HatRHSA-2026:56338MODERATE2026-07-27
RHSA-2026:56338 — Moderate
- Red HatRHSA-2026:56357MODERATE2026-07-27
RHSA-2026:56357 — Moderate
- Red HatRHSA-2026:57191MODERATE2026-07-27
RHSA-2026:57191 — Moderate
- Red HatRHSA-2026:57194MODERATE2026-07-27
RHSA-2026:57194 — Moderate
- Red HatRHSA-2026:57590MODERATE2026-07-27
RHSA-2026:57590 — Moderate
- Red HatRHSA-2026:59548MODERATE2026-07-27
RHSA-2026:59548 — Moderate
- Red HatRHSA-2026:59554MODERATE2026-07-27
RHSA-2026:59554 — Moderate
- Red HatRHSA-2026:59558MODERATE2026-07-27
RHSA-2026:59558 — Moderate
- Red HatRHSA-2026:59559MODERATE2026-07-27
RHSA-2026:59559 — Moderate
- Red HatRHSA-2026:59561MODERATE2026-07-27
RHSA-2026:59561 — Moderate
- Red HatRHSA-2026:59566MODERATE2026-07-27
RHSA-2026:59566 — Moderate
- Red HatRHSA-2026:59583MODERATE2026-07-27
RHSA-2026:59583 — Moderate
- Red HatRHSA-2026:59593MODERATE2026-07-27
RHSA-2026:59593 — Moderate
- Red HatRHSA-2026:60386MODERATE2026-07-27
RHSA-2026:60386 — Moderate
- Red HatRHSA-2026:60387MODERATE2026-07-27
RHSA-2026:60387 — Moderate
- Red HatRHSA-2026:60388MODERATE2026-07-27
RHSA-2026:60388 — Moderate
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 14× in last 7d / 96× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 263 total refreshes for this CVE.
- 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-04 12:43 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 08:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-04 08:21 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-03 03:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-03 03:24 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-01 14:28 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 10:22 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 06:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-01 06:17 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-28 13:17 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-28 09:11 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-28 05:06 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 05:06 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-24 11:01 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-24 06:35 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-24 02:29 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-23 22:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-23 22:21 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-23 17:53 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-23 11:03 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-23 06:56 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-23 02:51 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-22 22:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-22 22:43 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-20 05:52 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-20 01:47 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-20 01:47 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-18 22:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 22:34 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-18 11:17 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-18 07:12 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-18 03:06 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 03:06 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-17 19:31 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-17 09:17 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-17 02:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-17 02:02 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-16 12:00 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-16 06:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 06:46 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-14 16:14 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-14 10:44 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-14 06:33 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-14 02:28 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-13 22:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-13 22:22 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-13 15:28 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-13 11:13 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-13 06:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-13 02:26 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-12 22:19 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-12 17:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-12 17:42 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-12 15:01 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-12 13:22 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-12 09:16 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-12 05:11 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-12 01:00 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-11 20:55 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-11 16:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-11 16:45 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-11 09:37 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-11 07:17 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-11 03:09 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-10 20:56 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-10 15:10 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-10 15:10 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-09 08:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-09 08:56 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-08 01:36 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-07 21:30 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-07 21:30 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-06 16:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-06 16:49 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-06 12:42 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-06 08:30 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-06 03:39 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-05 23:33 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-05 19:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-05 19:28 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-05 06:58 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-04 17:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-04 17:37 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-04 13:16 UTCEG score recompute
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownnpm:postcss · Debian:11:node-postcss
Same vendor
10 shownredhat:RHSA-2026:56338 · redhat:RHSA-2026:59548 · redhat:RHSA-2026:57191
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-45623?
When was CVE-2026-45623 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-45623 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-45623?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-45623?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-45623
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-45623?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.