nanoid (Nano ID) before 3.3.16 and 5.1.16 contains an infinite loop in the customAlphabet and nanoid functions of its non-secure module (nanoid/non-secure). When these functions are given a negative size, the loop counter is decremented from a negative value and never reaches its termination condition, spinning indefinitely and hanging the calling thread. An application that passes an unvalidated, attacker-controlled negative size to these functions is exposed to a denial-of-service condition.
CVE-2026-67214
This high-severity CVE scores 7.5 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 0.3% (24th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). GitHub Security Advisory enrichment pending alignment with NVD CVSS.
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 7.5
- EG Score
- 7.5HIGHmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 34EG Risk 34/100CISA SSVC
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity75% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%CISA SSVC: Track at every mission impact level.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 0.3%
- EPSS %ILE
- 24th
- KEV
- Not listed
CISA SSVCTrack at every mission impact level.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table
Published
July 29, 2026
Last Modified
October 8, 2026
Advisory Details (3)
Auto-updated Jul 29, 2026nanoid before 5.1.16 Infinite Loop via Negative Size in non-secure module | Advisories | VulnCheck
https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/nanoid-before-infinite-loop-via-negative-size-in-non-secure-modulecommit 6ccc67bbaba7 (ai/nanoid)
Patch available: ai/nanoid 5.1.16 (contains commit 6ccc67bbaba7)
https://github.com/ai/nanoid/commit/6ccc67bbaba71d3d77a21d9b636f4171a268ce495.1.16
Patch available: ai/nanoid 5.1.16
https://github.com/ai/nanoid/releases/tag/5.1.16Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-67214(20)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- RHSA-2026:79088Red Hat Product SecurityCritical
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Developer Hub 1.10.5 release.
- RHSA-2026:74511Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Quay 3.17.5
- RHSA-2026:71113Red Hat Product SecurityCritical
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6 Product Security and Bug Fix Update
- RHSA-2026:70267Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Quay 3.14.9
- RHSA-2026:69255Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Quay 3.16.6
- RHSA-2026:69248Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Developer Hub 1.9.9 release.
- RHSA-2026:66523Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Quay 3.12.22
- RHSA-2026:66084Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Quay 3.10.26
- +12 more
Patch Availability(23)
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(9 across 5 ecosystems)
Debian:11(2)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| node-mocha | 10.0.0+ds1+~cs28.5.6-1 ... 9.2.2+ds1+~cs28.5.6-2 (30 versions) |
| — |
| node-postcss | 8.2.1+~cs5.3.23-8 ... 8.5.9+~cs9.3.30-1 (31 versions) |
| — |
Debian:12(2)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| node-mocha | — |
| — |
| node-postcss | 8.4.20+~cs8.0.23-1 ... 8.5.9+~cs9.3.30-1 (19 versions) |
| — |
Debian:13(2)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| node-mocha | — |
| — |
| node-postcss | 8.4.49+~cs9.2.32-1 ... 8.5.9+~cs9.3.30-1 (15 versions) |
| — |
Debian:14(2)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| node-mocha | — |
| — |
| node-postcss | 8.4.49+~cs9.2.32-1 ... 8.5.9+~cs9.3.30-1 (8 versions) |
| — |
npm(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| nanoid | — |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Additional Vendor Advisories
(4)
Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 17× in last 7d / 74× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 184 total refreshes for this CVE.
- 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-08 16:38 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-08 15:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-08 15:44 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-07 00:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-07 00:01 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-05 20:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-05 20:53 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-05 02:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-05 02:37 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-04 07:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-04 07:02 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-02 17:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 17:58 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-01 05:58 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 17:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 17:08 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-29 07:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-29 07:36 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-28 03:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 03:17 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-25 05:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-25 05:41 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-24 09:58 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-23 21:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-23 21:50 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-23 03:57 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-23 03:57 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-22 15:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-22 15:49 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-20 00:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-20 00:23 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-19 04:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-19 04:55 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-18 15:17 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-18 01:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 01:42 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-17 01:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-17 01:36 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-16 05:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 05:49 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-15 08:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-15 08:08 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-14 09:18 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-13 21:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-13 21:11 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-13 08:53 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-12 20:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-12 20:45 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-12 08:37 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-11 20:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-11 20:25 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-11 09:37 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-11 08:00 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-10 19:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-10 19:52 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-10 07:14 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-09 07:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-09 07:50 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-07 20:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-07 20:52 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-06 22:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-06 22:41 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-06 07:16 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-05 19:07 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-05 19:07 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-05 15:31 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-05 05:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-05 05:16 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-04 11:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-04 11:56 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-04 05:07 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-01 22:47 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-01 22:47 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-31 23:59 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-30 23:35 UTCEG score recompute
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownDebian:11:node-mocha · Debian:12:node-mocha · Debian:11:node-postcss
Same vendor
10 shownredhat:RHSA-2026:48241 · redhat:RHSA-2026:59558 · redhat:RHSA-2026:60386
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-67214?
When was CVE-2026-67214 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-67214 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-67214?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-67214?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-67214
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-67214?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.