CVE-2026-64409

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-07-25. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.1%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

Bluetooth: btmtksdio: fix infinite loop in btmtksdio_txrx_work()

Every once in a while we see a hung btmtksdio_flush() task:

INFO: task kworker/u17:0:189 blocked for more than 122 seconds. __cancel_work_timer+0x3f4/0x460 cancel_work_sync+0x1c/0x2c btmtksdio_flush+0x2c/0x40 hci_dev_open_sync+0x10c4/0x2190 [..]

It all boils down to incorrect time_is_before_jiffies() usage in btmtksdio_txrx_work(). The btmtksdio_txrx_work() loop is expected to be terminated if running for longer than 5*HZ. However the timeout check is twisted: time_is_before_jiffies(old_jiffies + 5*HZ) evaluates to true when old_jiffies + 5*HZ is in the past i.e. when a timeout has occurred. Using OR with time_is_before_jiffies(txrx_timeout) means that:

  • before the 5-second timeout: the condition is int_status || false,
so it loops as long as there are pending interrupts.
  • after the 5-second timeout: the condition becomes int_status || true,
which is always true.

When the loop becomes infinite btmtksdio_txrx_work() loop never terminates and never releases the SDIO host.

Fix loop termination condition to actually enforce a 5*HZ timeout.

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
25
EG Risk 25/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity55% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 5.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.1% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.1%
EPSS %ILE
1st
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (5.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
5.5 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.1% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-17). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

July 25, 2026

Last Modified

September 4, 2026

Advisory Details (6)

Auto-updated Sep 4, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

Bluetooth: btmtksdio: fix infinite loop in btmtksdio_txrx_work() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f6682c23b6fac4780d297ae4662053d17e58fd52
Web page

Bluetooth: btmtksdio: fix infinite loop in btmtksdio_txrx_work() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a257407e2bbbb099ed427719a50563f67fa366d8
Web page

Bluetooth: btmtksdio: fix infinite loop in btmtksdio_txrx_work() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7b429d611060e87752e848851815537963726493
Web page

Bluetooth: btmtksdio: fix infinite loop in btmtksdio_txrx_work() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/466540e045d01fcacf383a5beb8a2dad2fc53a26
Web page

Bluetooth: btmtksdio: fix infinite loop in btmtksdio_txrx_work() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0f0a83e26a9c7fd4b243c315ce07161d2496d83d
Web page

Bluetooth: btmtksdio: fix infinite loop in btmtksdio_txrx_work() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0039bdde36b23ccf1196635f1d52c5490481544d

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-64409(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(11)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(5 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:12(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (55 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.180-1: fixed in 6.1.180-1
—
linux-6.12—
  • every version up to 6.12.100-1~deb12u1: fixed in 6.12.100-1~deb12u1
—
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux-6.16.1.106-3~deb11u1 ... 6.1.177-1~deb11u1 (22 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.180-1~deb11u1: fixed in 6.1.180-1~deb11u1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.95-1~bpo12+1 (30 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.96-1: fixed in 6.12.96-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.1~rc7-1~exp1 (159 versions)
  • every version up to 7.1.4-1: fixed in 7.1.4-1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(11)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 56× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 167 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 67 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  2. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  3. 2026-10-18 03:22 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  5. 2026-10-16 16:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  6. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  7. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  8. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  9. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  10. 2026-10-12 15:48 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-11 19:32 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-11 16:47 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-11 14:09 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  15. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  16. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  17. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  18. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  19. 2026-10-07 04:32 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-07 04:32 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-10-07 04:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x8qw-hc9f-qxq2 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  22. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  23. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  24. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  25. 2026-10-04 07:31 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-04 07:31 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-10-04 07:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x8qw-hc9f-qxq2 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  3. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  4. 2026-10-02 19:23 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-02 19:23 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-10-02 19:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x8qw-hc9f-qxq2 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  7. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  8. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  9. 2026-10-01 04:13 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-01 04:13 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-10-01 04:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x8qw-hc9f-qxq2 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  12. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  13. 2026-09-29 08:21 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-09-29 08:21 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-09-29 08:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x8qw-hc9f-qxq2 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  16. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  17. 2026-09-28 04:12 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-09-28 04:12 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-09-28 04:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x8qw-hc9f-qxq2 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  20. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  21. 2026-09-25 07:42 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-09-25 07:42 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-09-25 07:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x8qw-hc9f-qxq2 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  24. 2026-09-24 00:35 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-09-24 00:35 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-09-24 00:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x8qw-hc9f-qxq2 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  27. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  28. 2026-09-22 21:59 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-09-22 21:59 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-09-22 21:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x8qw-hc9f-qxq2 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  31. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  32. 2026-09-20 01:24 UTCEG score recompute
  33. 2026-09-20 01:24 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-09-20 01:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x8qw-hc9f-qxq2 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  35. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  36. 2026-09-18 02:44 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-09-18 02:44 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-09-18 02:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x8qw-hc9f-qxq2 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  39. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  40. 2026-09-16 11:56 UTCEG score recompute
  41. 2026-09-16 11:56 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-09-16 11:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x8qw-hc9f-qxq2 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  43. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  44. 2026-09-15 09:22 UTCEG score recompute
  45. 2026-09-15 09:22 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-09-15 09:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x8qw-hc9f-qxq2 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  47. 2026-09-13 21:25 UTCEG score recompute
  48. 2026-09-13 21:25 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-09-13 21:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x8qw-hc9f-qxq2 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  50. 2026-09-12 17:40 UTCEG score recompute
  51. 2026-09-12 17:40 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-09-12 17:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x8qw-hc9f-qxq2 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  53. 2026-09-11 16:21 UTCEG score recompute
  54. 2026-09-11 16:21 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-09-11 16:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x8qw-hc9f-qxq2 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  56. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  57. 2026-09-11 09:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  58. 2026-09-10 13:17 UTCEG score recompute
  59. 2026-09-10 13:17 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-09-10 13:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x8qw-hc9f-qxq2 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  61. 2026-09-09 08:35 UTCEG score recompute
  62. 2026-09-09 08:35 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-09-09 08:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x8qw-hc9f-qxq2 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  64. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  65. 2026-09-07 21:14 UTCEG score recompute
  66. 2026-09-07 21:14 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-09-07 21:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x8qw-hc9f-qxq2 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  68. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  69. 2026-09-05 19:20 UTCEG score recompute
  70. 2026-09-05 19:20 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-09-05 19:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x8qw-hc9f-qxq2 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  72. 2026-09-05 15:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  73. 2026-09-04 15:30 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 5.5 MEDIUM
  74. 2026-09-04 15:30 UTCVendor advisory
  75. 2026-09-04 15:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x8qw-hc9f-qxq2

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-64409?
CVE-2026-64409 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on July 25, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Bluetooth: btmtksdio: fix infinite loop in btmtksdiotxrxwork() Every once in a while we see a hung btmtksdio_flush() task: INFO: task kworker/u17:0:189 blocked for more than 122 seconds. cancelworktimer+0x3f4/0x460…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-64409 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-64409 was published on July 25, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of September 4, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-64409 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-64409 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (1st percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-64409?
CVE-2026-64409 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-64409?
A fix for CVE-2026-64409 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-64409 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-64409

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-64409?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.