CVE-2026-54272

MEDIUMPre-NVD 6.96.9
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

This medium-severity CVE scores 6.9 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.4% (34th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from a secondary CVSS source
Sources: EPSS, a secondary CVSS source
Trending — 3 sources updated this weekElevated

Also known asEUVD-2026-49375 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-22jq-vg5j-6vgg (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

6.9EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.4%CVSS: 6.9Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

ip-address is a library for parsing and manipulating IPv4 and IPv6 addresses in JavaScript. Versions 10.1.1 through 10.2.0 are vulnerable to SSRF through misclassification of IPv4-mapped/NAT64 IPv6 addresses. Address6.getType() classifies an address by matching it against a table of known IPv6 special-use prefixes, returning Global unicast when nothing matches. That table had no entry for the IPv4-mapped range (::ffff:0:0/96), so every mapped address fell through to Global unicast; NAT64 addresses matched their own NAT64 … labels. The boolean checks isLoopback, isUnspecified, and isMulticast compared getType() against a fixed label and so returned false, while isLinkLocal and isULA checked only the native IPv6 ranges. The library already exposed isMapped4() and to4(), but did not apply them inside these checks, so a mapped or NAT64 address was never normalized to its embedded IPv4 address before classification. For IPv4-mapped addresses the host OS routes to the IPv4 stack, so the misclassification is reachable on any dual-stack host. For NAT64, the classification bypass is unconditional but end-to-end reachability additionally requires a NAT64/DNS64 gateway in the deployment network.This issue has been fixed in version 10.2.1.

CVSS v3
6.9
EG Score
6.9MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
62
EG Risk 62/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity69% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 6.9 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.4%
EPSS %ILE
34th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (6.9): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 6.9 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
6.9 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.a secondary CVSS source · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
EG Likelihood
0.4% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-28). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

July 27, 2026

Last Modified

October 24, 2026

Advisory Details (1)

Auto-updated Jul 27, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github.
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

ip-address: misclassification of IPv4-mapped/NAT64 IPv6 addresses can bypass SSRF and trust-boundary checks · Advisory · beaugunderson/ip-address · GitHub

https://github.com/beaugunderson/ip-address/security/advisories/GHSA-22jq-vg5j-6vgg

Patch Availability(27)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatrhdh/rhdh-hub-rhel9:17895542852026-09-21redhat
redhatdevspaces/openvsx-rhel9:17891442692026-09-17redhat
redhatansible-automation-platform/bootc-automation-portal-rhel9:17889435312026-09-09redhat
redhatopenshift4/ose-agent-installer-ui-rhel9:17883352362026-09-08redhat
redhatopenshift4/ose-agent-installer-ui-rhel9:17883149632026-09-08redhat
redhatopenshift4/ose-agent-installer-ui-rhel9:17883515782026-09-08redhat
redhatrhdh/rhdh-hub-rhel9:17882860492026-09-02redhat
redhatnodejs:22-9060020260901085634.rhel92026-09-02redhat
redhatrhacm2/console-rhel9:17873392492026-08-26redhat
redhatrhacm2/console-rhel9:17873351052026-08-26redhat
redhatrhacm2/console-rhel9:17876870622026-08-26redhat
redhatrhacm2/console-rhel9:17873392482026-08-26redhat
redhatmulticluster-engine/console-mce-rhel9:17872590482026-08-25redhat
redhatmulticluster-engine/console-mce-rhel9:17870793592026-08-25redhat
redhatopenshift-service-mesh/kiali-rhel9:17870764952026-08-25redhat
redhatopenshift-service-mesh/kiali-rhel9:17871656832026-08-25redhat
redhatopenshift-service-mesh/kiali-rhel9:17870921982026-08-25redhat
redhatmulticluster-engine/console-mce-rhel9:17866688562026-08-25redhat
redhatopenshift-service-mesh/kiali-rhel9:17870922552026-08-25redhat
redhatopenshift-service-mesh/kiali-rhel9:17870771082026-08-25redhat
redhatmulticluster-engine/console-mce-rhel9:17872642502026-08-25redhat
redhatnodejs24-1:24.18.0-5.el10_22026-08-24redhat
redhatansible-automation-platform/automation-portal:17870471142026-08-18redhat
redhatansible-automation-platform/automation-portal:17870471882026-08-18redhat
redhatnodejs:22-9080020260806135640.rhel92026-08-17redhat
redhatnodejs:24-9080020260806135511.rhel92026-08-17redhat
redhatnodejs:24-8100020260807112957.6d8804032026-08-12redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(2 across 2 ecosystems)
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
node-ip-address10.2.0-1, 10.2.0-2, 8.1.0-2, 8.1.0-3
  • every version up to 10.3.1-1: fixed in 10.3.1-1
—
npm(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
ip-address—
  • 10.1.1 up to 10.2.1: fixed in 10.2.1
—

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(7)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 47× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 190 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 90 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  2. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  3. 2026-10-29 16:24 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-29 16:24 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  6. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  7. 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  8. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  9. 2026-10-25 14:19 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  11. 2026-10-24 13:34 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-24 13:34 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  14. 2026-10-22 21:22 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  16. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  17. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  18. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  19. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  20. 2026-10-18 03:31 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  22. 2026-10-16 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  23. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  24. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  25. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  2. 2026-10-12 15:56 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-11 19:39 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-11 16:55 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-11 14:18 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  7. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  8. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  9. 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  10. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  11. 2026-10-07 02:27 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-07 02:27 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  14. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  15. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  16. 2026-10-04 07:18 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-04 07:18 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  19. 2026-10-02 18:27 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-02 18:27 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  22. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  23. 2026-10-01 03:52 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-01 03:52 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  26. 2026-09-29 15:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  27. 2026-09-29 07:53 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-09-29 07:53 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  30. 2026-09-28 03:33 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-09-28 03:33 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  33. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  34. 2026-09-25 06:52 UTCEG score recompute
  35. 2026-09-25 06:52 UTCVendor advisory
  36. 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  37. 2026-09-23 22:02 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-09-23 22:02 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  40. 2026-09-22 21:48 UTCEG score recompute
  41. 2026-09-22 21:48 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  43. 2026-09-20 00:55 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-09-20 00:55 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-09-19 00:23 UTCEG score recompute
  46. 2026-09-19 00:23 UTCVendor advisory
  47. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  48. 2026-09-18 02:23 UTCEG score recompute
  49. 2026-09-18 02:23 UTCVendor advisory
  50. 2026-09-17 19:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  51. 2026-09-17 04:16 UTCEG score recompute
  52. 2026-09-17 04:16 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  54. 2026-09-16 06:16 UTCEG score recompute
  55. 2026-09-16 06:16 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  57. 2026-09-14 15:41 UTCEG score recompute
  58. 2026-09-14 15:41 UTCVendor advisory
  59. 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  60. 2026-09-13 15:22 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-09-12 16:47 UTCEG score recompute
  62. 2026-09-12 16:47 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-09-11 18:47 UTCEG score recompute
  64. 2026-09-11 18:47 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  66. 2026-09-10 20:47 UTCEG score recompute
  67. 2026-09-10 20:47 UTCVendor advisory
  68. 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  69. 2026-09-09 21:06 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-09-09 08:19 UTCEG score recompute
  71. 2026-09-09 08:19 UTCVendor advisory
  72. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  73. 2026-09-07 21:03 UTCEG score recompute
  74. 2026-09-07 21:03 UTCVendor advisory
  75. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-54272?
CVE-2026-54272 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on July 27, 2026. ip-address is a library for parsing and manipulating IPv4 and IPv6 addresses in JavaScript. Versions 10.1.1 through 10.2.0 are vulnerable to SSRF through misclassification of IPv4-mapped/NAT64 IPv6 addresses. Address6.getType() classifies an address by matching it against a table of known IPv6…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-54272 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-54272 was published on July 27, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 24, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-54272 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-54272 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.4% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (34th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-54272?
CVE-2026-54272 has a CVSS base score of 6.9 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-54272?
A fix for CVE-2026-54272 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-54272 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-54272

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-54272?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.