ip-address is a library for parsing and manipulating IPv4 and IPv6 addresses in JavaScript. Versions 10.1.1 through 10.2.0 are vulnerable to SSRF through misclassification of IPv4-mapped/NAT64 IPv6 addresses. Address6.getType() classifies an address by matching it against a table of known IPv6 special-use prefixes, returning Global unicast when nothing matches. That table had no entry for the IPv4-mapped range (::ffff:0:0/96), so every mapped address fell through to Global unicast; NAT64 addresses matched their own NAT64 … labels. The boolean checks isLoopback, isUnspecified, and isMulticast compared getType() against a fixed label and so returned false, while isLinkLocal and isULA checked only the native IPv6 ranges. The library already exposed isMapped4() and to4(), but did not apply them inside these checks, so a mapped or NAT64 address was never normalized to its embedded IPv4 address before classification. For IPv4-mapped addresses the host OS routes to the IPv4 stack, so the misclassification is reachable on any dual-stack host. For NAT64, the classification bypass is unconditional but end-to-end reachability additionally requires a NAT64/DNS64 gateway in the deployment network.This issue has been fixed in version 10.2.1.
CVE-2026-54272
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
This medium-severity CVE scores 6.9 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.4% (34th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
Also known asEUVD-2026-49375 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-22jq-vg5j-6vgg (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 6.9
- EG Score
- 6.9MEDIUMmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 62EG Risk 62/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity69% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 6.9 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation40% × 40%EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 0.4%
- EPSS %ILE
- 34th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (6.9): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 6.9 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 6.9 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.a secondary CVSS source · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
- EG Likelihood
- 0.4% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-28). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
July 27, 2026
Last Modified
October 24, 2026
Advisory Details (1)
Auto-updated Jul 27, 2026ip-address: misclassification of IPv4-mapped/NAT64 IPv6 addresses can bypass SSRF and trust-boundary checks · Advisory · beaugunderson/ip-address · GitHub
https://github.com/beaugunderson/ip-address/security/advisories/GHSA-22jq-vg5j-6vggVendor Advisories for CVE-2026-54272(20)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- RHSA-2026:69248Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Developer Hub 1.9.9 release.
- RHSA-2026:68754Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces 3.30.1 Release.
- RHSA-2026:66003Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Ansible automation portal Red Hat Enterprise Linux Images
- RHSA-2026:63046Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: OpenShift Container Platform 4.21.32 bug fix and security update
- RHSA-2026:63096Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: OpenShift Container Platform 4.22.13 bug fix and security update
- RHSA-2026:63103Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: OpenShift Container Platform 4.20.37 bug fix and security update
- RHSA-2026:62851Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Developer Hub 1.10.4 release.
- RHSA-2026:62416Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: nodejs:22 security update
- +12 more
Patch Availability(27)
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(2 across 2 ecosystems)
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| node-ip-address | 10.2.0-1, 10.2.0-2, 8.1.0-2, 8.1.0-3 |
| — |
npm(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| ip-address | — |
| — |
Weakness Classification(2)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Additional Vendor Advisories
(7)
Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.
- Red HatRHSA-2026:54371MODERATE2026-07-27
RHSA-2026:54371 — Moderate
- Red HatRHSA-2026:55601MODERATE2026-07-27
RHSA-2026:55601 — Moderate
- Red HatRHSA-2026:55603MODERATE2026-07-27
RHSA-2026:55603 — Moderate
- Red HatRHSA-2026:56338MODERATE2026-07-27
RHSA-2026:56338 — Moderate
- Red HatRHSA-2026:56357MODERATE2026-07-27
RHSA-2026:56357 — Moderate
- Red HatRHSA-2026:58819MODERATE2026-07-27
RHSA-2026:58819 — Moderate
- Red HatRHSA-2026:59548MODERATE2026-07-27
RHSA-2026:59548 — Moderate
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 47× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 190 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 90 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-10-29 16:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-29 16:24 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-10-25 14:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-10-24 13:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 13:34 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-10-22 21:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-10-18 03:31 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-10-16 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-10-12 15:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 19:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 16:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 14:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-10-07 02:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-07 02:27 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-10-04 07:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-04 07:18 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-10-02 18:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 18:27 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-10-01 03:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-01 03:52 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-09-29 15:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-09-29 07:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-29 07:53 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-09-28 03:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 03:33 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-09-25 06:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-25 06:52 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-09-23 22:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-23 22:02 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
- 2026-09-22 21:48 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-22 21:48 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
- 2026-09-20 00:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-20 00:55 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-19 00:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-19 00:23 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
- 2026-09-18 02:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 02:23 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-17 19:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
- 2026-09-17 04:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-17 04:16 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
- 2026-09-16 06:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 06:16 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
- 2026-09-14 15:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-14 15:41 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
- 2026-09-13 15:22 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-12 16:47 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-12 16:47 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-11 18:47 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-11 18:47 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
- 2026-09-10 20:47 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-10 20:47 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
- 2026-09-09 21:06 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-09 08:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-09 08:19 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
- 2026-09-07 21:03 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-07 21:03 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
8 shownDebian:14:node-ip-address · npm:ip-address
Same vendor
10 shownredhat:RHSA-2026:54371 · redhat:RHSA-2026:56338 · redhat:RHSA-2026:59548
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-54272?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-54272 published?
Is CVE-2026-54272 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-54272?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-54272?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-54272
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-54272?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.