An issue was discovered in the resolv gem before 0.7.2 for Ruby. Resolv::DNS::MessageEncoder wrote a DNS label's length into a single octet without checking its range. A label longer than 255 octets had its length stored modulo 256 but the label data was written unchanged, and thus the bytes on the wire described a different name than the one the application asked to encode. RFC 1035 section 2.3.4 limits a label to 63 octets, and the two high bits of the length octet are reserved for compression pointers. put_string packed the length with put_pack("C", d.length) and put_label used it for labels, and thus any value from 0 to 255 could end up as a label length octet, including the reserved 0x40-0xBF range and the 0xC0-0xFF pointer range. Resolv::DNS::Name.create did not check per-label or total name length either, and thus an attacker-controlled hostname reached the encoder unchanged. An application that resolves an attacker-controlled hostname sends a query whose wire bytes name a domain the attacker chose. A hostname suffix that the application validates against an allowlist becomes padding that never appears on the wire, and thus allowlist and egress checks can be bypassed. The recursive resolver caches the response under the attacker's name, and DNS logs record that name rather than the one the application asked for. A label length whose low octet lands in the 0xC0-0xFF range produces a length octet that conforming parsers read as the start of a compression pointer, with the following attacker-controlled byte as the offset.
CVE-2026-80213
Score 4.0 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-08-27. a secondary CVSS source baseline 4.0; sources differ by 0.0.
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.
- CVSS v3
- 4.0
- EG Score
- 4.0(high)
- EG Risk
- 18(Track)EG Risk 18/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity40% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- 0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 24%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
August 27, 2026
Last Modified
August 27, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Aug 27, 2026Security advisories: CVE-2026-80212 and CVE-2026-80213 | Ruby
https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2026/08/27/multiple-vulnerabilities-in-resolv/GitHub - ruby/resolv: A thread-aware DNS resolver library written in Ruby · GitHub
https://github.com/ruby/resolvVendor Advisories for CVE-2026-80213(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 13× in last 7d / 13× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-08-30 02:12 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-30 02:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-28 23:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-28 23:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-27 20:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-27 20:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-27 20:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-27 20:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-27 17:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-27 16:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-27 16:43 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-80213?
When was CVE-2026-80213 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-80213 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-80213?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-80213?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-80213
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-80213?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.