CVE-2026-7383

HIGHPre-NVD 8.18.1
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 8.1 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-06-09. CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1 baseline 8.1; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: cisa-adp, epss, ghsa
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
8.1EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 1%CVSS: 8.1Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

Issue summary: A signed integer overflow when sizing the destination buffer for Unicode output in ASN1_mbstring_ncopy() can lead to a heap buffer overflow.

Impact summary: A heap buffer overflow may lead to a crash or possibly attacker controlled code execution or other undefined behaviour.

In ASN1_mbstring_copy() and ASN1_mbstring_ncopy() the destination size for Unicode output is computed in a signed int: by left shift of the input character count for BMPSTRING (UTF-16) and UNIVERSALSTRING (UTF-32), and by summing per-character byte counts for UTF8STRING. The calculation overflows when the input reaches around 2^30 characters. In the worst case (UNIVERSALSTRING at 2^30 characters) the size wraps to zero, OPENSSL_malloc(1) is called, and the subsequent character copy writes several gigabytes past the one-byte allocation.

X.509 certificate processing routes through ASN1_STRING_set_by_NID(), whose DIRSTRING_TYPE mask excludes UNIVERSALSTRING and whose per-NID size limits cap the input length; no network protocol or certificate-handling path in OpenSSL exercises the overflow. Triggering the bug requires an application that calls ASN1_mbstring_copy() or ASN1_mbstring_ncopy() directly, or registers a custom string type via ASN1_STRING_TABLE_add(), with attacker-controlled input on the order of half a gigabyte or more. For these reasons this issue was assigned Low severity.

The FIPS modules in 4.0, 3.6, 3.5, 3.4 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the affected code is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.

CVSS v3
8.1
EG Score
8.1(medium)
EG Risk
37(Track)
EG Risk 37/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity81% × 45%
Exploitation1% × 40%
Automatability0% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
1%
EPSS %ILE
51%
KEV
Not listed

Published

June 9, 2026

Last Modified

July 23, 2026

Advisory Details (1)

Auto-updated Jun 9, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.

Patch Availability(7)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntuopenssl-provider-legacy (3.5.5-1ubuntu3.2) @ resolute2026-08-20ubuntu
ubuntuopenssl1.0 (1.0.2n-1ubuntu5.13+esm5) @ bionic2026-08-20ubuntu
redhatinsights-proxy/insights-proxy-container-rhel9:17828905032026-07-01redhat
redhatdiscovery/discovery-ui-rhel9:17821669522026-06-24redhat
redhatrhui5/rhua-rhel9:17815257392026-06-16redhat
redhatopenssl-1:3.5.5-4.el9_82026-06-11redhat
redhatopenssl-1:3.5.5-4.el10_22026-06-11redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(7 across 7 ecosystems)
Alpine:v3.22(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
openssl3.5.7-r0
Alpine:v3.23(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
openssl3.5.7-r0
Alpine:v3.24(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
openssl3.5.7-r0
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
openssl1.1.1k-1 ... 1.1.1w-0~deb11u1 (23 versions)1.1.1w-0+deb11u8
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
openssl3.0.10-1 ... 3.0.9-1 (22 versions)3.0.20-1~deb12u2
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
openssl3.5.1-1 ... 3.5.6-1~deb13u1 (11 versions)3.5.6-1~deb13u2
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
openssl3.5.1-1 ... 3.6.2-1 (19 versions)3.6.3-1

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(2)

Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 31× in last 7d / 141× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 314 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-08-20 22:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-20 21:30 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-08-20 21:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-08-20 09:19 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-08-20 09:19 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-08-20 09:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-18 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-08-18 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-08-17 13:11 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-08-17 13:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-08-17 00:59 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-08-17 00:59 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-08-17 00:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-08-16 12:47 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-08-16 12:47 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-08-16 12:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-08-16 02:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-08-16 00:36 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-08-16 00:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-08-15 11:50 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-08-15 11:50 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-15 11:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-08-15 01:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-08-14 23:36 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-08-14 23:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-08-14 11:24 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-08-14 11:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-08-13 23:13 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-08-13 23:13 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-08-13 23:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-08-13 11:00 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-08-13 11:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-08-12 22:49 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-08-12 22:49 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-08-12 22:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-08-12 10:38 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-08-12 10:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-08-11 22:26 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-08-11 22:26 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-08-11 22:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-08-11 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-08-11 10:15 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-08-11 10:15 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-08-11 10:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  26. 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-08-10 22:03 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-08-10 22:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
  29. 2026-08-10 09:51 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-08-10 09:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  31. 2026-08-09 21:40 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-08-09 21:40 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-08-09 21:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  34. 2026-08-09 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-08-09 09:29 UTCVendor advisory
  36. 2026-08-09 09:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  37. 2026-08-08 21:18 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-08-08 21:18 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-08-08 21:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  40. 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-08-08 09:06 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-08-08 09:06 UTCGHSA enrichment
  43. 2026-08-07 20:55 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-08-07 20:55 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-08-07 20:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  46. 2026-08-07 08:44 UTCVendor advisory
  47. 2026-08-07 08:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  48. 2026-08-06 20:33 UTCEG score recompute
  49. 2026-08-06 20:33 UTCVendor advisory
  50. 2026-08-06 20:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
  51. 2026-08-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-08-06 08:22 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-08-06 08:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  54. 2026-08-05 20:11 UTCEG score recompute
  55. 2026-08-05 20:11 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-08-05 20:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  57. 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-08-04 16:11 UTCEG score recompute
  60. 2026-08-04 16:11 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-08-04 16:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  62. 2026-08-04 10:39 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-08-04 03:13 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-08-04 03:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  65. 2026-08-03 15:02 UTCEG score recompute
  66. 2026-08-03 15:02 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-08-03 15:02 UTCGHSA enrichment
  68. 2026-08-03 10:36 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-08-02 22:59 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-08-02 22:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  71. 2026-08-02 10:48 UTCEG score recompute
  72. 2026-08-02 10:48 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-08-02 10:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  74. 2026-08-02 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-08-01 22:35 UTCVendor advisory

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-7383?
CVE-2026-7383 is a high vulnerability published on June 9, 2026. Issue summary: A signed integer overflow when sizing the destination buffer for Unicode output in ASN1mbstringncopy() can lead to a heap buffer overflow. Impact summary: A heap buffer overflow may lead to a crash or possibly attacker controlled code execution or other undefined behaviour. In…
When was CVE-2026-7383 disclosed?
CVE-2026-7383 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on June 9, 2026, with the most recent update on July 23, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-7383 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-7383 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 49.5% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-7383?
CVE-2026-7383 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 8.1 (CISA-ADP / Vulnrichment enrichment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-7383?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-7383, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-7383

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-7383?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.