RabbitMQ is a messaging and streaming broker. From 3.13.0 until 4.3.3, 4.2.9, 4.1.14, 4.0.23, and 3.13.18, JWKS Fetch Ignores HTTP Response Status Code - Signing Key Destruction Causes Authentication DoS (CWE-252). the JWKS key fetching mechanism in uaajwt.erl does not validate the HTTP response status code when downloading signing keys from the OAuth2 provider's JWKS endpoint. Non-200 responses (including 4xx and 5xx errors) are processed identically to successful responses. When the JWKS endpoint returns an error response with a valid-JSON body that lacks a keys field, all previously cached signing keys are destroyed, causing a persistent authentication denial of Files: deps/rabbitmqauthbackendoauth2/src/uaajwt.erl, lines 50-63 deps/rabbitmqauthbackendoauth2/src/uaajwks.erl, lines 5-7 deps/rabbitmqauthbackendoauth2/src/rabbitoauth2provider.erl, lines 98-107 Bug 1: HTTP status code ignored (uaajwt.erl:50-63): The Erlang httpc module returns {ok, {{HttpVersion, StatusCode, ReasonPhrase}, Headers, Body}}. The pattern {ok, {, , JwksBody}} matches ANY successful HTTP transaction Persistent authentication DoS: Once keys are destroyed, ALL OAuth2/JWT authentication fails for all users until a new successful JWKS refresh occurs Amplification: A single attacker can deny access to all legitimate OAuth2 users across the entire RabbitMQ. This issue is fixed in versions 4.3.3, 4.2.9, 4.1.14, 4.0.23, and 3.13.18.
CVE-2026-67409
This high-severity CVE scores 8.2 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.5% (39th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 8.2
- EG Score
- 8.2HIGHmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 53EG Risk 53/100CISA SSVC
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity82% × 45%Exploitation40% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%CISA SSVC: Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 0.5%
- EPSS %ILE
- 39th
- KEV
- Not listed
CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table
Published
September 25, 2026
Last Modified
September 28, 2026
Advisory Details (3)
Auto-updated Sep 25, 2026RabbitMQ 4.3.3
Patch available: rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server v4.3.3
https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/releases/tag/v4.3.3RabbitMQ 4.2.9
Patch available: rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server v4.2.9
https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/releases/tag/v4.2.9JWKS Fetch Ignores HTTP Response Status Code - Signing Key Destruction Causes Authentication DoS (CWE-252) · Advisory · rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server · GitHub
https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/security/advisories/GHSA-qw3h-qqm9-jrw8Affected Packages
(3 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| rabbitmq-server | 3.10.8-1.1 ... 4.3.2-5 (28 versions) |
| — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| rabbitmq-server | 4.0.5-10 ... 4.3.2-5 (18 versions) |
| — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| rabbitmq-server | 4.0.5-10 ... 4.3.2-5 (16 versions) |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 14× in last 7d / 23× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-10-05 04:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-04 02:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-02 23:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-01 21:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-30 19:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-29 17:00 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-29 03:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 14:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-27 23:03 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-26 20:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-25 18:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-25 17:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-25 17:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-25 16:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-25 16:24 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same product + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownDebian:12:rabbitmq-server
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-67409?
When was CVE-2026-67409 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-67409 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-67409?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-67409?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-67409
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-67409?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.