CVE-2026-86749

MEDIUMPre-NVD 6.36.3
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

Score 6.3 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-09-09. a secondary CVSS source baseline 6.3; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 3 sources updated this week
6.3EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 6.3Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

Snipe-IT versions <= 8.6.3 (fixed in 8.7.0) do not check the return value of storage write operations in ImageUploadRequest::handleImages(). Because Laravel's default disk mode does not throw on failure, a silently failed Storage::disk('public')->put(...) call still caused the application to delete the previous image via deleteExistingImage() and to reassign and persist the model's image reference to the new filename, destroying the existing image and leaving the database row pointing at a file that was never written. A mirror problem existed in deleteExistingImage(), where a failed Storage::delete() still nulled the model's image field, orphaning the file on disk. The condition is not directly attacker-controlled: it is triggered when any legitimate authenticated user submits an image upload while the storage backend transiently fails (for example an S3 network error, a local filesystem permission problem, or quota exhaustion). The result is unrecoverable loss of the prior image and a durable inconsistency between the database and disk that requires manual reconciliation. All models whose controllers route through ImageUploadRequest::handleImages (assets, asset models, users, companies, manufacturers, locations, categories, suppliers, departments, and other image-carrying models) are affected.

CVSS v3
6.3
EG Score
6.3(high)
EG Risk
33(Track)
EG Risk 33/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity63% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
15%
KEV
Not listed

Published

September 9, 2026

Last Modified

September 14, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Sep 9, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github.
generic

snipe-it before 8.7.0 Data Loss via Failed Image Write | Advisories | VulnCheck

https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/snipe-it-before-8.7.0-data-loss-via-failed-image-write
github Patch Available

Failed Image Write Destroys Existing Image and Leaves Model Pointing at Phantom File · Advisory · grokability/snipe-it · GitHub

https://github.com/grokability/snipe-it/security/advisories/GHSA-v37p-hr9x-5w85

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-86749(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 19× in last 7d / 29× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-09-18 18:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-09-17 20:14 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-09-17 20:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-09-17 19:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-09-16 18:11 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-09-16 18:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-09-16 14:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-09-15 19:16 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-09-15 19:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-09-15 03:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-09-15 03:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-09-14 20:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-09-14 14:02 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-09-14 14:02 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-09-13 15:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-09-12 16:42 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-09-12 16:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-09-11 18:02 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-09-11 18:02 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-09-10 19:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-09-09 20:41 UTCEG score recompute
Show 4 more
  1. 2026-09-09 20:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-09-09 14:26 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-09-09 13:45 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-09-09 13:44 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-86749?
CVE-2026-86749 is a medium vulnerability published on September 9, 2026. Snipe-IT versions <= 8.6.3 (fixed in 8.7.0) do not check the return value of storage write operations in ImageUploadRequest::handleImages(). Because Laravel's default disk mode does not throw on failure, a silently failed Storage::disk('public')->put(...) call still caused the application to delete…
When was CVE-2026-86749 disclosed?
CVE-2026-86749 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on September 9, 2026, with the most recent update on September 14, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-86749 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-86749 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 85.4% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-86749?
CVE-2026-86749 has a CVSS v3 base score of 6.3 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-86749?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-86749, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-86749

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-86749?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.