RabbitMQ is a messaging and streaming broker. Prior to 3.13.15, 4.0.20, 4.1.11, and 4.2.6, RabbitMQ allows foreign bindings to amq.rabbitmq.reply-to destinations because volatile direct-reply-to queues can be accepted at bind and route time but are missing from Khepri-backed deletion checks, leaving persistent route entries after unbind. This issue is fixed in versions 3.13.15, 4.0.20, 4.1.11, and 4.2.6.
CVE-2026-57215
“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.
This high-severity CVE scores 8.8 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 0.4% (30th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 8.8
- EG Score
- 8.8HIGHmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 40EG Risk 40/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity88% × 45%The EG Score, 8.8 of 10.Exploitation0.4% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 0.4%
- EPSS %ILE
- 30th
- KEV
- Not listed
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
July 10, 2026
Last Modified
July 13, 2026
Advisory Details (6)
Auto-updated Jul 10, 2026Direct-reply-to binding persistence can lead to unauthorized reply-channel injection and persistent phantom · Advisory · rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server · GitHub
https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/security/advisories/GHSA-5cq3-v9jx-p3x3RabbitMQ 4.2.6
Patch available: rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server v4.2.6
https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/releases/tag/v4.2.6Reject bindings to Direct Reply-to virtual "queues" (backport #15935) (backport #15937)
Fix merged in rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server PR #15938 on 2026-04-06 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/pull/15938Reject bindings to Direct Reply-to virtual "queues"
Fix merged in rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server PR #15935 on 2026-04-05 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/pull/15935commit c84f3c880e0f (rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server)
Fix landed in rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server commit c84f3c880e0f — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/commit/c84f3c880e0f22b49c01237cf8f86e176eeadc72commit 9055500d10ca (rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server)
Fix landed in rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server commit 9055500d10ca — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/commit/9055500d10ca7629dd2b051c6dc7a4b0bb8f6734Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-57215(3)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- CVE-2026-57215Microsoft Security Response Center (MSRC)High
RabbitMQ: Direct-reply-to binding persistence can lead to unauthorized reply-channel injection and persistent phantom
- RHSA-2026:35940Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs bug fix and enhancement update
- RHSA-2026:35939Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs bug fix and enhancement update
Patch Availability(2)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | rabbitmq-server4-3-main-4.3.2-1.hum1 | 2026-07-06 | redhat |
| redhat | rabbitmq-server4-2-main-4.2.8-1.hum1 | 2026-07-06 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| rabbitmq-server | 3.10.8-1 ... 4.3.2-4 (38 versions) |
| — |
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| rabbitmq-server | 3.10.8-1.1 ... 4.3.2-5 (28 versions) |
| — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| rabbitmq-server | 4.0.5-10 ... 4.3.2-5 (18 versions) |
| — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| rabbitmq-server | 4.0.5-10 ... 4.3.0-1 (9 versions) |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 11× in last 7d / 40× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 219 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 119 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-10-12 15:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 19:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 16:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 14:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-01 14:57 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-01 14:57 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-09-29 15:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-09-28 09:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 09:46 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
- 2026-09-24 11:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-24 11:09 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-23 05:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-23 05:44 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-18 05:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 05:17 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-17 19:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-15 03:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-13 23:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-13 23:38 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-13 08:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-13 08:11 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-12 15:01 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-12 02:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-12 02:49 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
- 2026-09-08 02:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-08 02:45 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-06 13:56 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
- 2026-09-05 21:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-05 21:40 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-04 05:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
- 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
- 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
- 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
- 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
- 2026-08-30 18:26 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-30 06:14 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-30 06:14 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
- 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
- 2026-08-27 21:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-27 21:40 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
- 2026-08-27 00:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-27 00:46 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
- 2026-08-26 03:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-26 03:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
- 2026-08-25 09:49 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-24 20:13 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-24 20:13 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-24 06:28 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-23 17:52 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-23 05:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-23 05:41 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-08-22 17:28 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-22 04:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-22 04:42 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-08-21 16:04 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-21 03:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-21 03:44 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-08-20 15:11 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-20 01:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-20 01:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-08-19 12:17 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-18 23:43 UTCEG score recompute
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownDebian:11:rabbitmq-server
Same vendor
10 shownredhat:RHSA-2026:35939
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-57215?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-57215 published?
Is CVE-2026-57215 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-57215?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-57215?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-57215
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-57215?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.