RabbitMQ is a messaging and streaming broker. Prior to 3.13.15, 4.0.20, 4.1.11, and 4.2.6, RabbitMQ allows foreign bindings to amq.rabbitmq.reply-to destinations because volatile direct-reply-to queues can be accepted at bind and route time but are missing from Khepri-backed deletion checks, leaving persistent route entries after unbind. This issue is fixed in versions 3.13.15, 4.0.20, 4.1.11, and 4.2.6.
CVE-2026-57215
This high-severity CVE scores 8.8 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 0.7%, top 52% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 8.8
- EG Score
- 8.8(medium)
- EG Risk
- 40(Track)EG Risk 40/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity88% × 45%Exploitation1% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- 1%
- EPSS %ILE
- 48%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
July 10, 2026
Last Modified
July 13, 2026
Advisory Details (6)
Auto-updated Jul 10, 2026Direct-reply-to binding persistence can lead to unauthorized reply-channel injection and persistent phantom · Advisory · rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server · GitHub
https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/security/advisories/GHSA-5cq3-v9jx-p3x3RabbitMQ 4.2.6
Patch available: rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server v4.2.6
https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/releases/tag/v4.2.6Reject bindings to Direct Reply-to virtual "queues" (backport #15935) (backport #15937)
Fix merged in rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server PR #15938 on 2026-04-06 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/pull/15938Reject bindings to Direct Reply-to virtual "queues"
Fix merged in rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server PR #15935 on 2026-04-05 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/pull/15935commit c84f3c880e0f (rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server)
Fix landed in rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server commit c84f3c880e0f — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/commit/c84f3c880e0f22b49c01237cf8f86e176eeadc72commit 9055500d10ca (rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server)
Fix landed in rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server commit 9055500d10ca — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/commit/9055500d10ca7629dd2b051c6dc7a4b0bb8f6734Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-57215(3)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- CVE-2026-57215Microsoft Security Response Center (MSRC)High
RabbitMQ: Direct-reply-to binding persistence can lead to unauthorized reply-channel injection and persistent phantom
- RHSA-2026:35940Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs bug fix and enhancement update
- RHSA-2026:35939Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs bug fix and enhancement update
Patch Availability(2)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fixed in / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | rabbitmq-server4-3-main-4.3.2-1.hum1 | 2026-07-06 | redhat |
| redhat | rabbitmq-server4-2-main-4.2.8-1.hum1 | 2026-07-06 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| rabbitmq-server | 3.10.8-1 ... 4.3.2-4 (38 versions) | — | — |
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| rabbitmq-server | 3.10.8-1.1 ... 4.3.2-4 (27 versions) | — | — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| rabbitmq-server | 4.0.5-10 ... 4.3.2-4 (17 versions) | — | — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| rabbitmq-server | 4.0.5-10 ... 4.3.0-1 (9 versions) | 4.3.0-2 | — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 18× in last 7d / 106× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 154 total refreshes for this CVE.
- 2026-08-30 06:14 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-30 06:14 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-27 21:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-27 21:40 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-27 00:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-27 00:46 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-26 03:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-26 03:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-25 09:49 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-24 20:13 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-24 20:13 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-24 06:28 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-23 17:52 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-23 05:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-23 05:41 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-22 17:28 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-22 04:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-22 04:42 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-08-21 16:04 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-21 03:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-21 03:44 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-20 15:11 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-20 01:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-20 01:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-19 12:17 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-18 23:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-18 23:43 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-18 11:31 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-17 23:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-17 23:20 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-17 11:08 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-16 22:57 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-16 22:57 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-16 10:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-16 10:45 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-15 22:34 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-15 10:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-15 10:22 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-14 22:10 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-14 09:59 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-14 09:59 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-13 21:47 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-13 09:36 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-12 21:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-12 21:24 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-12 09:13 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-11 21:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-11 21:02 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-11 08:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-11 08:51 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-10 20:39 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-10 08:28 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-09 20:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-09 20:16 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-09 08:05 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-08 19:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-08 19:54 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-08 07:42 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-07 19:31 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-07 19:31 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-07 07:19 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-06 19:07 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-06 19:07 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-06 06:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-06 06:56 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-05 18:44 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-05 06:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-04 16:03 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-04 16:03 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-04 15:10 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-04 10:39 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-04 03:51 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-03 15:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-03 15:39 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-03 10:36 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-03 03:28 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-02 15:16 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-02 03:05 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-02 03:05 UTCVendor advisory
Related CVEs(same vendor + same CWE)
Same vendor
10 shownredhat
- CVE-2001-0825EG 10.0HIGH
- CVE-2001-0554EG 10.0EPSS p99HIGH
- CVE-2001-0414EG 10.0EPSS p100HIGH
- CVE-2001-0191EG 10.0EPSS p92HIGH
- CVE-2001-0301EG 10.0EPSS p91HIGH
- CVE-2001-0197EG 10.0EPSS p96HIGH
- CVE-2001-0233EG 10.0EPSS p96HIGH
- CVE-2001-0010EG 10.0EPSS p98HIGH
- CVE-2001-0011EG 10.0EPSS p94HIGH
- CVE-2001-0013EG 10.0EPSS p96HIGH
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-863
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-57215?
When was CVE-2026-57215 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-57215 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-57215?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-57215?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-57215
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-57215?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.