RabbitMQ is a messaging and streaming broker. Prior to 3.13.15, 4.0.21, 4.1.11, and 4.2.6, RabbitMQ topic authorization can allow restricted topic writes and binds during metadata-store failures because topic-permission lookup errors from Khepri can collapse to undefined, which the internal backend treats as allow. This issue is fixed in versions 3.13.15, 4.0.21, 4.1.11, and 4.2.6.
CVE-2026-57217
“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.
This medium-severity CVE scores 6.5 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 0.4% (26th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
- CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 6.5
- EG Score
- 6.5MEDIUMmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 45EG Risk 45/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity65% × 45%The EG Score, 6.5 of 10.Exploitation40% × 40%EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 0.4%
- EPSS %ILE
- 26th
- KEV
- Not listed
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
July 10, 2026
Last Modified
July 13, 2026
Advisory Details (6)
Auto-updated Jul 10, 2026Topic authorization can lead to cross-tenant routing-key bypass · Advisory · rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server · GitHub
https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/security/advisories/GHSA-gpvw-75h5-3wvxRabbitMQ 4.2.6
Patch available: rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server v4.2.6
https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/releases/tag/v4.2.6Khepri reads: distinguish missing keys from errors in one place (backport #15941) (backport #15942)
Fix merged in rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server PR #15943 on 2026-04-06 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/pull/15943Khepri reads: distinguish missing keys from errors in one place
Fix merged in rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server PR #15941 on 2026-04-06 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/pull/15941commit ce1f682aa6b3 (rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server)
Fix landed in rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server commit ce1f682aa6b3 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/commit/ce1f682aa6b398820c5e3ce1ff7435184027c82ccommit 94f1d33a70fc (rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server)
Fix landed in rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server commit 94f1d33a70fc — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/commit/94f1d33a70fcfa09006649599e79fc92786a2d36Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-57217(3)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- CVE-2026-57217Microsoft Security Response Center (MSRC)High
RabbitMQ: Topic authorization can lead to cross-tenant routing-key bypass
- RHSA-2026:35940Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs bug fix and enhancement update
- RHSA-2026:35939Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs bug fix and enhancement update
Patch Availability(2)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | rabbitmq-server4-3-main-4.3.2-1.hum1 | 2026-07-06 | redhat |
| redhat | rabbitmq-server4-2-main-4.2.8-1.hum1 | 2026-07-06 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| rabbitmq-server | 3.10.8-1 ... 4.3.2-4 (38 versions) |
| — |
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| rabbitmq-server | 3.10.8-1.1 ... 4.3.2-5 (28 versions) |
| — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| rabbitmq-server | 4.0.5-10 ... 4.3.2-5 (18 versions) |
| — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| rabbitmq-server | 4.0.5-10 ... 4.3.0-1 (9 versions) |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 11× in last 7d / 40× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 185 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 85 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 26th percentile
- 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 26th percentile
- 2026-10-12 15:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 19:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 16:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 14:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 26th percentile
- 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 26th percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 26th percentile
- 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 26th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 26th percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 26th percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 26th percentile
- 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 26th percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 26th percentile
- 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 26th percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 26th percentile
- 2026-10-01 14:57 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-01 14:57 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 26th percentile
- 2026-09-29 15:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 26th percentile
- 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 26th percentile
- 2026-09-28 09:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 09:46 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 26th percentile
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 26th percentile
- 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-09-24 11:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-24 11:09 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-09-23 05:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-23 05:44 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-09-18 05:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 05:17 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-17 19:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-09-15 03:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-09-14 07:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-14 07:11 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-09-13 08:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-13 08:11 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-12 02:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-12 02:45 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-09-08 02:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-08 02:45 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-09-05 21:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-05 21:40 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-04 05:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-08-30 06:14 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-30 06:14 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-08-28 02:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-28 02:38 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-08-27 02:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-27 02:43 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-08-26 03:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-26 03:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-08-24 20:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-24 20:33 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-23 21:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-23 21:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
- 2026-08-22 22:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-22 22:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
- 2026-08-21 23:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-21 00:31 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-21 00:31 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
- 2026-08-20 01:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-20 01:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
- 2026-08-18 20:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-18 20:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
- 2026-08-17 15:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-17 15:02 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
- 2026-08-16 16:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-16 16:02 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
- 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
- 2026-08-15 17:02 UTCEG score recompute
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownDebian:11:rabbitmq-server
Same vendor
10 shownredhat:RHSA-2026:35939
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-57217?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-57217 published?
Is CVE-2026-57217 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-57217?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-57217?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-57217
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-57217?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.