9Router is an AI router & token saver. Prior to 0.5.2, 9router protects /v1, /v1beta, /api/v1, and /api/v1beta in src/dashboardGuard.js but omits /codex before next.config.mjs rewrites /codex/* to /api/v1/responses. A remote unauthenticated attacker can send requests to /codex/* to bypass the API-key gate and cause the server to make upstream provider calls using operator-stored LLM provider credentials. This issue is fixed in version 0.5.2.
CVE-2026-55638
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
This high-severity CVE scores 8.6 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.6% (47th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
- CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 8.6
- EG Score
- 8.6HIGHmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 70EG Risk 70/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity86% × 45%The EG Score, 8.6 of 10.Exploitation40% × 40%EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 0.6%
- EPSS %ILE
- 47th
- KEV
- Not listed
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
July 10, 2026
Last Modified
July 10, 2026
Advisory Details (3)
Auto-updated Jul 10, 2026Unauthenticated LLM proxy access via /codex rewrite authorization bypass · Advisory · decolua/9router · GitHub
https://github.com/decolua/9router/security/advisories/GHSA-8gmq-j984-vp4rfeat: Combo Fusion + Capacity auto-switch, Kiro API-key, Claude auto-ping & 429 throttle version 0.5.2
Patch available: decolua/9router v0.5.2
https://github.com/decolua/9router/releases/tag/v0.5.2commit b282f0554972 (decolua/9router)
Patch available: decolua/9router v0.5.2 (contains commit b282f0554972)
https://github.com/decolua/9router/commit/b282f0554972ea35281520738759d76abcd0b0b3Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-55638(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Affected Packages
(1 across 1 ecosystem)
npm(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9router | — |
| — |
Weakness Classification(2)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 11× in last 7d / 34× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 136 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 36 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-10-12 15:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 19:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 16:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 14:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-10-01 15:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-09-29 15:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-09-28 09:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-24 11:13 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-09-23 05:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-09-18 05:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-17 19:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-09-15 03:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-09-13 23:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-09-13 08:13 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-12 02:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-09-08 02:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:57 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-09-05 21:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-08-30 06:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-08-27 21:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-08-27 00:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-08-26 03:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-08-24 20:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-23 03:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-08-22 03:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-08-21 03:12 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-08-20 01:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-08-18 20:35 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-08-18 02:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-08-17 01:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-08-16 13:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-08-15 01:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-08-14 01:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-08-12 14:10 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-08-11 14:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-11 02:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-08-09 14:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-08-09 03:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-08-08 03:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-06 15:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-08-06 03:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-08-05 01:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-04 15:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-08-04 13:35 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-04 10:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-08-03 12:54 UTCEG score recompute
Related CVEs(same product + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownnpm:9router
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-55638?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-55638 published?
Is CVE-2026-55638 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-55638?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-55638?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-55638
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-55638?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.