CVE-2026-57212

HIGHNVD 7.77.7
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

This high-severity CVE scores 7.7 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 0.4% (35th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from NVD CVSS v3
Sources: EPSS, NVD CVSS v3
Elevated
7.7EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.4%CVSS: 7.7Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

RabbitMQ is a messaging and streaming broker. Prior to 3.13.14, 4.0.19, 4.1.10, and 4.2.5, the rabbitmq_management HTTP API accepts oversized valid JSON bodies on with_decode and direct_request paths because read_complete_body checks the accumulated size before the final chunk but not the final combined size. This issue is fixed in versions 3.13.14, 4.0.19, 4.1.10, and 4.2.5.

CVSS v3
7.7
EG Score
7.7HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
51
EG Risk 51/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity77% × 45%
The EG Score, 7.7 of 10.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.4%
EPSS %ILE
35th
KEV
Not listed

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

July 10, 2026

Last Modified

July 13, 2026

Advisory Details (6)

Auto-updated Jul 10, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github_commit, github_pr, github_release, github.
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

RabbitMQ management HTTP API accepts request bodies larger than configured max_http_body_size · Advisory · rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server · GitHub

https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/security/advisories/GHSA-5cmq-vp28-xqrj
GitHub release Patch Available

RabbitMQ 4.2.5

Patch available: rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server v4.2.5

https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/releases/tag/v4.2.5
GitHub pull request

HTTP API: refactor `read_complete_body/1` (backport #15712)

Fix merged in rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server PR #15714 on 2026-03-12 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/pull/15714
GitHub pull request

HTTP API: refactor `read_complete_body/1`

Fix merged in rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server PR #15712 on 2026-03-12 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/pull/15712
GitHub commit

commit b8fc2ef7c50a (rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server)

Fix landed in rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server commit b8fc2ef7c50a — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/commit/b8fc2ef7c50a2797d15e1ea7cf34f290032303bb
GitHub commit

commit 3976d148901b (rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server)

Fix landed in rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server commit 3976d148901b — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/commit/3976d148901bdfa82e1cd60b7a4534e073266ba5

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-57212(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(2)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatrabbitmq-server4-2-main-4.2.8-1.hum12026-07-06redhat
redhatrabbitmq-server4-3-main-4.3.2-1.hum12026-07-06redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
rabbitmq-server3.10.8-1 ... 4.3.2-4 (38 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
rabbitmq-server3.10.8-1.1 ... 4.3.2-5 (28 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
rabbitmq-server4.0.5-10 ... 4.3.2-5 (18 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
rabbitmq-server4.0.5-10 ... 4.3.0-1 (9 versions)
  • every version up to 4.3.0-2: fixed in 4.3.0-2
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 11× in last 7d / 40× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 214 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 114 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  2. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  3. 2026-10-12 15:54 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-11 19:37 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-11 16:52 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-11 14:15 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  8. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  9. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  10. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  11. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  12. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  13. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  14. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  15. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  16. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  17. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  18. 2026-10-01 14:58 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-01 14:58 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  21. 2026-09-29 15:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  22. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  23. 2026-09-28 09:46 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-09-28 09:46 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  2. 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  3. 2026-09-24 11:09 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-09-24 11:09 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  6. 2026-09-23 05:44 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-09-23 05:44 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  9. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  10. 2026-09-18 05:17 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-09-18 05:17 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-09-17 19:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  13. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  14. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  15. 2026-09-15 03:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  16. 2026-09-13 23:39 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-09-13 23:39 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  19. 2026-09-13 08:11 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-09-12 15:07 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-09-12 15:07 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-09-12 02:49 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-09-12 02:49 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  25. 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  26. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  27. 2026-09-08 02:46 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-09-08 02:46 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  30. 2026-09-06 13:56 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-09-06 13:56 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  33. 2026-09-05 21:40 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-09-05 21:40 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-09-04 05:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  36. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  37. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  38. 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  39. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  40. 2026-08-30 18:31 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-08-30 06:14 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-08-30 06:14 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  44. 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  45. 2026-08-27 21:40 UTCEG score recompute
  46. 2026-08-27 21:40 UTCVendor advisory
  47. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  48. 2026-08-27 00:46 UTCEG score recompute
  49. 2026-08-27 00:46 UTCVendor advisory
  50. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  51. 2026-08-26 03:33 UTCEG score recompute
  52. 2026-08-26 03:33 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  54. 2026-08-25 09:49 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-08-24 20:14 UTCEG score recompute
  56. 2026-08-24 20:14 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-08-24 06:28 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-08-23 18:03 UTCVendor advisory
  59. 2026-08-23 05:45 UTCEG score recompute
  60. 2026-08-23 05:45 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  62. 2026-08-22 17:28 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-08-22 04:42 UTCEG score recompute
  64. 2026-08-22 04:42 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  66. 2026-08-21 16:04 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-08-21 03:44 UTCEG score recompute
  68. 2026-08-21 03:44 UTCVendor advisory
  69. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  70. 2026-08-20 15:11 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-08-20 01:32 UTCEG score recompute
  72. 2026-08-20 01:32 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  74. 2026-08-19 09:16 UTCVendor advisory
  75. 2026-08-18 20:33 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-57212?
CVE-2026-57212 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on July 10, 2026. RabbitMQ is a messaging and streaming broker. Prior to 3.13.14, 4.0.19, 4.1.10, and 4.2.5, the rabbitmqmanagement HTTP API accepts oversized valid JSON bodies on withdecode and directrequest paths because readcomplete_body checks the accumulated size before the final chunk but not the final…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-57212 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-57212 was published on July 10, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of July 13, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-57212 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-57212 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.4% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (35th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-57212?
CVE-2026-57212 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.7 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-57212?
A fix for CVE-2026-57212 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-57212 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-57212

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-57212?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.