RabbitMQ is a messaging and streaming broker. From 3.13.0 until 3.13.18 and 4.0.23 and 4.1.14 and 4.2.9 and 4.3.3, Stored XSS via TLS peer-certificate DN in stream-management UI (sibling of V-11). lines 102/106/110 render peercertsubject / peercertissuer with raw <%= %> and no fmtstring(). RFC4514 backslash-escaping of > is HTML-inert and bypassable (). Requires non-default config: a stream TLS listener with verifypeer and an attacker-obtainable trusted cert with a malicious Same as the connection.ejs finding, against operators viewing the stream-connection detail rabbitmqstream + rabbitmqstreammanagement enabled with a TLS listener using verifypeer Attacker can obtain a certificate signed by a CA the listener trusts, with attacker-chosen DN An operator views the. This issue is fixed in versions 3.13.18 and 4.0.23 and 4.1.14 and 4.2.9 and 4.3.3.
CVE-2026-67239
This high-severity CVE scores 7.6 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.3% (17th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 7.6
- EG Score
- 7.6HIGHmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 34EG Risk 34/100CISA SSVC
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity76% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%CISA SSVC: Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 0.3%
- EPSS %ILE
- 17th
- KEV
- Not listed
CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table
Published
September 25, 2026
Last Modified
September 28, 2026
Advisory Details (3)
Auto-updated Sep 25, 2026RabbitMQ 4.3.3
Patch available: rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server v4.3.3
https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/releases/tag/v4.3.3RabbitMQ 4.2.9
Patch available: rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server v4.2.9
https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/releases/tag/v4.2.9Stored XSS via TLS peer-certificate DN in stream-management UI (sibling of V-11) · Advisory · rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server · GitHub
https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/security/advisories/GHSA-xm9p-57xv-vxwcVendor Advisories for CVE-2026-67239(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Affected Packages
(3 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| rabbitmq-server | 3.10.8-1.1 ... 4.3.2-5 (28 versions) |
| — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| rabbitmq-server | 4.0.5-10 ... 4.3.2-5 (18 versions) |
| — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| rabbitmq-server | 4.0.5-10 ... 4.3.2-5 (16 versions) |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 18× in last 7d / 26× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-10-05 06:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-05 06:52 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-04 18:38 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 06:20 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 18:07 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-03 18:07 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-03 05:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-02 05:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-30 16:35 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-30 03:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-29 02:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 14:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-27 18:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-26 18:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-25 17:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-25 16:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-25 16:24 UTCEG score recompute
Show 1 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-25 16:24 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-67239?
When was CVE-2026-67239 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-67239 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-67239?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-67239?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-67239
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-67239?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.