CVE-2025-69421

HIGHNVD 7.57.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 7.5 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-01-27. NVD baseline CVSS 7.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Trending — Patch released this week
7.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 1.0%CVSS: 7.5Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Issue summary: Processing a malformed PKCS#12 file can trigger a NULL pointer dereference in the PKCS12_item_decrypt_d2i_ex() function.

Impact summary: A NULL pointer dereference can trigger a crash which leads to Denial of Service for an application processing PKCS#12 files.

The PKCS12_item_decrypt_d2i_ex() function does not check whether the oct parameter is NULL before dereferencing it. When called from PKCS12_unpack_p7encdata() with a malformed PKCS#12 file, this parameter can be NULL, causing a crash. The vulnerability is limited to Denial of Service and cannot be escalated to achieve code execution or memory disclosure.

Exploiting this issue requires an attacker to provide a malformed PKCS#12 file to an application that processes it. For that reason the issue was assessed as Low severity according to our Security Policy.

The FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the PKCS#12 implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.

OpenSSL 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.0, 1.1.1 and 1.0.2 are vulnerable to this issue.

CVSS v3
7.5
EG Score
7.5HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
49
EG Risk 49/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity75% × 45%
The EG Score, 7.5 of 10.
Exploitation1.0% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
1.0%
EPSS %ILE
60th
KEV
Not listed

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

January 27, 2026

Last Modified

October 15, 2026

Advisory Details (7)

Auto-updated Aug 2, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github_commit.
GitHub commit

commit a2dbc539f0f9 (openssl/openssl)

Fix landed in openssl/openssl commit a2dbc539f0f9 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/a2dbc539f0f9cc63832709fa5aa33ad9495eb19c
GitHub commit

commit 643986985cd1 (openssl/openssl)

Fix landed in openssl/openssl commit 643986985cd1 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/643986985cd1c21221f941129d76fe0c2785aeb3
GitHub commit

commit 4bbc8d41a72c (openssl/openssl)

Fix landed in openssl/openssl commit 4bbc8d41a72c — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/4bbc8d41a72c842ce4077a8a3eccd1109aaf74bd
GitHub commit

commit 36ecb4960872 (openssl/openssl)

Fix landed in openssl/openssl commit 36ecb4960872 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/36ecb4960872a4ce04bf6f1e1f4e78d75ec0c0c7
GitHub commit

commit 3524a29271f8 (openssl/openssl)

Fix landed in openssl/openssl commit 3524a29271f8 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/3524a29271f8191b8fd8a5257eb05173982a097b

Patch Availability(13)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(10 across 10 ecosystems)
Alpine:v3.17(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
openssl—
  • 1.0.2 up to 3.0.19-r0: fixed in 3.0.19-r0
—
Alpine:v3.20(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
openssl—
  • 1.0.2 up to 3.3.6-r0: fixed in 3.3.6-r0
—
Alpine:v3.21(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
openssl—
  • 1.0.2 up to 3.3.6-r0: fixed in 3.3.6-r0
—
Alpine:v3.22(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
openssl—
  • 1.0.2 up to 3.5.5-r0: fixed in 3.5.5-r0
—
Alpine:v3.23(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
openssl—
  • 1.0.2 up to 3.5.5-r0: fixed in 3.5.5-r0
—
Alpine:v3.24(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
openssl—
  • 1.0.2 up to 3.5.5-r0: fixed in 3.5.5-r0
—
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
openssl1.1.1k-1 ... 1.1.1w-0~deb11u1 (20 versions)
  • every version up to 1.1.1w-0+deb11u5: fixed in 1.1.1w-0+deb11u5
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
openssl3.0.10-1 ... 3.0.9-1 (18 versions)
  • every version up to 3.0.18-1~deb12u2: fixed in 3.0.18-1~deb12u2
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
openssl3.5.1-1, 3.5.1-1+deb13u1, 3.5.2-1, 3.5.3-1, 3.5.4-1~deb13u1
  • every version up to 3.5.4-1~deb13u2: fixed in 3.5.4-1~deb13u2
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
openssl3.5.1-1 ... 3.5.5-1~deb13u2 (8 versions)
  • every version up to 3.5.5-1: fixed in 3.5.5-1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(2)

Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 15× in last 7d / 34× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 99 of 225 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 1 repeat row among the latest 100 is merged into the row it repeats. The 126 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-15 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
  2. 2026-10-15 01:42 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-15 01:42 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-10-15 01:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w9rv-xc8m-cmqp · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  5. 2026-10-14 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
  6. 2026-10-13 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
  7. 2026-10-12 16:46 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
  9. 2026-10-11 20:21 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-11 18:33 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-11 15:07 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-11 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
  13. 2026-10-10 19:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
  14. 2026-10-09 20:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
  15. 2026-10-09 12:58 UTCOSV refresh
  16. 2026-10-08 17:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
  17. 2026-10-07 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
  18. 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
  19. 2026-10-05 17:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
  20. 2026-10-04 23:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
  21. 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
  22. 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
  23. 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
  24. 2026-09-29 15:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 59th percentile
  25. 2026-09-28 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 59th percentile
Show 74 more
  1. 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 59th percentile
  2. 2026-09-24 14:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 59th percentile
  3. 2026-09-23 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  4. 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  5. 2026-09-19 20:33 UTCOSV refresh
  6. 2026-09-18 19:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  7. 2026-09-17 19:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  8. 2026-09-16 14:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  9. 2026-09-16 05:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  10. 2026-09-15 03:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  11. 2026-09-13 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  12. 2026-09-12 15:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  13. 2026-09-11 14:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 56th percentile
  14. 2026-09-11 09:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 56th percentile
  15. 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 56th percentile
  16. 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 56th percentile
  17. 2026-09-07 16:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 56th percentile
  18. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 56th percentile
  19. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 56th percentile
  20. 2026-09-02 14:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 56th percentile
  21. 2026-09-01 13:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 56th percentile
  22. 2026-09-01 00:04 UTCOSV refresh
  23. 2026-08-30 01:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 56th percentile
  24. 2026-08-28 21:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 56th percentile
  25. 2026-08-27 14:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 56th percentile
  26. 2026-08-26 14:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 56th percentile
  27. 2026-08-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  28. 2026-08-24 14:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  29. 2026-08-23 00:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  30. 2026-08-21 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  31. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  32. 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  33. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  34. 2026-08-17 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  35. 2026-08-16 14:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  36. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  37. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  38. 2026-08-15 00:53 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-08-15 00:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w9rv-xc8m-cmqp · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  40. 2026-08-14 12:11 UTCEG score recompute
  41. 2026-08-14 12:11 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-08-14 12:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w9rv-xc8m-cmqp · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  43. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  44. 2026-08-13 04:16 UTCEG score recompute
  45. 2026-08-13 04:16 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-08-13 04:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w9rv-xc8m-cmqp · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  47. 2026-08-12 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  48. 2026-08-11 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  49. 2026-08-10 23:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  50. 2026-08-10 10:25 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-08-10 10:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w9rv-xc8m-cmqp · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  52. 2026-08-09 17:58 UTCEG score recompute
  53. 2026-08-09 17:58 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-08-09 17:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w9rv-xc8m-cmqp · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  55. 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  56. 2026-08-08 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  57. 2026-08-07 23:24 UTCEG score recompute
  58. 2026-08-07 23:24 UTCVendor advisory
  59. 2026-08-07 23:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w9rv-xc8m-cmqp · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  60. 2026-08-07 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  61. 2026-08-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  62. 2026-08-06 04:53 UTCEG score recompute
  63. 2026-08-06 04:53 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-08-06 04:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w9rv-xc8m-cmqp · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  65. 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  66. 2026-08-04 10:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  67. 2026-08-03 10:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  68. 2026-08-02 22:02 UTCEG score recompute
  69. 2026-08-02 22:02 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-08-02 22:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-w9rv-xc8m-cmqp · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  71. 2026-08-02 02:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  72. 2026-08-01 04:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  73. 2026-07-31 06:42 UTCOSV refresh
  74. 2026-07-30 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2025-69421?
CVE-2025-69421 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on January 27, 2026. Issue summary: Processing a malformed PKCS#12 file can trigger a NULL pointer dereference in the PKCS12itemdecryptd2iex() function. Impact summary: A NULL pointer dereference can trigger a crash which leads to Denial of Service for an application processing PKCS#12 files. The…
When was CVE-2025-69421 made public?
CVE-2025-69421 was made public on January 27, 2026: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, OpenSSL Software Foundation, gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on January 27, 2026. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 15, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2025-69421 actively exploited?
CVE-2025-69421 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 1.0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (60th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-69421?
CVE-2025-69421 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2025-69421?
A fix for CVE-2025-69421 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2025-69421 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2025-69421

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-69421?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.