CVE-2025-66199

MEDIUMNVD 5.95.9
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 5.9 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-01-27. NVD baseline CVSS 5.9; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
5.9EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.5%CVSS: 5.9Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Issue summary: A TLS 1.3 connection using certificate compression can be forced to allocate a large buffer before decompression without checking against the configured certificate size limit.

Impact summary: An attacker can cause per-connection memory allocations of up to approximately 22 MiB and extra CPU work, potentially leading to service degradation or resource exhaustion (Denial of Service).

In affected configurations, the peer-supplied uncompressed certificate length from a CompressedCertificate message is used to grow a heap buffer prior to decompression. This length is not bounded by the max_cert_list setting, which otherwise constrains certificate message sizes. An attacker can exploit this to cause large per-connection allocations followed by handshake failure. No memory corruption or information disclosure occurs.

This issue only affects builds where TLS 1.3 certificate compression is compiled in (i.e., not OPENSSL_NO_COMP_ALG) and at least one compression algorithm (brotli, zlib, or zstd) is available, and where the compression extension is negotiated. Both clients receiving a server CompressedCertificate and servers in mutual TLS scenarios receiving a client CompressedCertificate are affected. Servers that do not request client certificates are not vulnerable to client-initiated attacks.

Users can mitigate this issue by setting SSL_OP_NO_RX_CERTIFICATE_COMPRESSION to disable receiving compressed certificates.

The FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4 and 3.3 are not affected by this issue, as the TLS implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.

OpenSSL 3.6, 3.5, 3.4 and 3.3 are vulnerable to this issue.

OpenSSL 3.0, 1.1.1 and 1.0.2 are not affected by this issue.

CVSS v3
5.9
EG Score
5.9MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
27
EG Risk 27/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity59% × 45%
The EG Score, 5.9 of 10.
Exploitation0.4% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.5%
EPSS %ILE
37th
KEV
Not listed

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

January 27, 2026

Last Modified

June 17, 2026

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated Aug 7, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github_commit.
GitHub commit

commit 966a2478046c (openssl/openssl)

Fix landed in openssl/openssl commit 966a2478046c — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/966a2478046c311ed7dae50c457d0db4cafbf7e4
GitHub commit

commit 895150b5e021 (openssl/openssl)

Fix landed in openssl/openssl commit 895150b5e021 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/895150b5e021d16b52fb32b97e1dd12f20448be5
GitHub commit

commit 6184a4fb08ee (openssl/openssl)

Fix landed in openssl/openssl commit 6184a4fb08ee — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/6184a4fb08ee6d7bca570d931a4e8bef40b64451
GitHub commit

commit 3ed1f7524993 (openssl/openssl)

Fix landed in openssl/openssl commit 3ed1f7524993 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/3ed1f75249932b155eef993a8e66a99cb98bfef4

Patch Availability(9)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntuopenssl-provider-legacy (3.5.3-1ubuntu3) @ questing2026-06-08ubuntu
redhatopenssl-main-3.5.6-0.1.hum12026-04-09redhat
redhatrhui5/rhua-rhel9:17736701372026-03-18redhat
redhatcostmanagement/costmanagement-metrics-rhel9-operator:17708363492026-02-24redhat
redhatrhui5/installer-rhel9:17706469252026-02-11redhat
redhatinsights-proxy/insights-proxy-container-rhel9:17707404052026-02-10redhat
redhatdiscovery/discovery-ui-rhel9:17691117742026-02-02redhat
redhatopenssl-1:3.5.1-7.el9_72026-01-28redhat
redhatopenssl-1:3.5.1-7.el10_12026-01-28redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(7 across 7 ecosystems)
Alpine:v3.20(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
openssl—
  • 3.3.0 up to 3.3.6-r0: fixed in 3.3.6-r0
—
Alpine:v3.21(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
openssl—
  • 3.3.0 up to 3.3.6-r0: fixed in 3.3.6-r0
—
Alpine:v3.22(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
openssl—
  • 3.3.0 up to 3.5.5-r0: fixed in 3.5.5-r0
—
Alpine:v3.23(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
openssl—
  • 3.3.0 up to 3.5.5-r0: fixed in 3.5.5-r0
—
Alpine:v3.24(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
openssl—
  • 3.3.0 up to 3.5.5-r0: fixed in 3.5.5-r0
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
openssl3.5.1-1, 3.5.1-1+deb13u1, 3.5.2-1, 3.5.3-1, 3.5.4-1~deb13u1
  • every version up to 3.5.4-1~deb13u2: fixed in 3.5.4-1~deb13u2
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
openssl3.5.1-1 ... 3.5.5-1~deb13u2 (8 versions)
  • every version up to 3.5.5-1: fixed in 3.5.5-1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(1)

Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 11× in last 7d / 31× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 95 of 197 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 5 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 102 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-15 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
  2. 2026-10-14 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
  3. 2026-10-13 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
  4. 2026-10-12 16:48 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
  6. 2026-10-11 20:23 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-11 18:35 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-11 15:10 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-11 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
  10. 2026-10-10 19:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
  11. 2026-10-09 20:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
  12. 2026-10-08 18:34 UTCOSV refresh
  13. 2026-10-08 17:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
  14. 2026-10-07 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
  15. 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
  16. 2026-10-05 17:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
  17. 2026-10-04 23:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
  18. 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
  19. 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
  20. 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 36th percentile
  21. 2026-09-29 15:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 36th percentile
  22. 2026-09-28 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 36th percentile
  23. 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 36th percentile
  24. 2026-09-24 14:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 36th percentile
  25. 2026-09-23 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
Show 70 more
  1. 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  2. 2026-09-19 15:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  3. 2026-09-19 00:06 UTCOSV refresh
  4. 2026-09-18 19:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  5. 2026-09-17 19:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  6. 2026-09-16 14:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  7. 2026-09-15 03:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  8. 2026-09-13 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  9. 2026-09-12 15:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  10. 2026-09-11 14:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  11. 2026-09-11 09:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  12. 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  13. 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  14. 2026-09-07 16:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  15. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  16. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  17. 2026-09-02 14:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  18. 2026-09-01 13:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  19. 2026-08-31 04:03 UTCOSV refresh
  20. 2026-08-30 19:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  21. 2026-08-30 01:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  22. 2026-08-28 21:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  23. 2026-08-27 14:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  24. 2026-08-26 14:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  25. 2026-08-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  26. 2026-08-24 14:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  27. 2026-08-23 00:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  28. 2026-08-21 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  29. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  30. 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  31. 2026-08-18 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  32. 2026-08-17 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  33. 2026-08-16 14:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  34. 2026-08-16 02:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  35. 2026-08-15 01:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  36. 2026-08-14 12:11 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-08-14 12:11 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-08-14 12:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5888-36j9-c92p · GitHub CVSS 5.9
  39. 2026-08-13 21:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  40. 2026-08-13 04:17 UTCEG score recompute
  41. 2026-08-13 04:17 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-08-13 04:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5888-36j9-c92p · GitHub CVSS 5.9
  43. 2026-08-12 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  44. 2026-08-11 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  45. 2026-08-10 23:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  46. 2026-08-09 17:58 UTCEG score recompute
  47. 2026-08-09 17:58 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-08-09 17:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5888-36j9-c92p · GitHub CVSS 5.9
  49. 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  50. 2026-08-08 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  51. 2026-08-07 23:25 UTCEG score recompute
  52. 2026-08-07 23:25 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-08-07 23:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5888-36j9-c92p · GitHub CVSS 5.9
  54. 2026-08-07 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  55. 2026-08-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  56. 2026-08-06 04:53 UTCEG score recompute
  57. 2026-08-06 04:53 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-08-06 04:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5888-36j9-c92p · GitHub CVSS 5.9
  59. 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  60. 2026-08-04 15:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  61. 2026-08-04 10:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  62. 2026-08-03 10:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  63. 2026-08-02 22:02 UTCEG score recompute
  64. 2026-08-02 22:02 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-08-02 22:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5888-36j9-c92p · GitHub CVSS 5.9
  66. 2026-08-02 02:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  67. 2026-08-01 04:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  68. 2026-07-31 06:12 UTCOSV refresh
  69. 2026-07-30 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  70. 2026-07-30 01:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2025-66199?
CVE-2025-66199 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on January 27, 2026. Issue summary: A TLS 1.3 connection using certificate compression can be forced to allocate a large buffer before decompression without checking against the configured certificate size limit. Impact summary: An attacker can cause per-connection memory allocations of up to approximately 22 MiB and…
When was CVE-2025-66199 made public?
CVE-2025-66199 was made public on January 27, 2026: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, OpenSSL Software Foundation, gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on January 27, 2026. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of June 17, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2025-66199 actively exploited?
CVE-2025-66199 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.5% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (37th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-66199?
CVE-2025-66199 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.9 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2025-66199?
A fix for CVE-2025-66199 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2025-66199 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2025-66199

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-66199?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.