CVE-2025-66199

MEDIUMNVD 5.95.9
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.9 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-01-27. NVD baseline CVSS 5.9; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
5.9
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: 0%CVSS: 5.9Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

Issue summary: A TLS 1.3 connection using certificate compression can be forced to allocate a large buffer before decompression without checking against the configured certificate size limit.

Impact summary: An attacker can cause per-connection memory allocations of up to approximately 22 MiB and extra CPU work, potentially leading to service degradation or resource exhaustion (Denial of Service).

In affected configurations, the peer-supplied uncompressed certificate length from a CompressedCertificate message is used to grow a heap buffer prior to decompression. This length is not bounded by the max_cert_list setting, which otherwise constrains certificate message sizes. An attacker can exploit this to cause large per-connection allocations followed by handshake failure. No memory corruption or information disclosure occurs.

This issue only affects builds where TLS 1.3 certificate compression is compiled in (i.e., not OPENSSL_NO_COMP_ALG) and at least one compression algorithm (brotli, zlib, or zstd) is available, and where the compression extension is negotiated. Both clients receiving a server CompressedCertificate and servers in mutual TLS scenarios receiving a client CompressedCertificate are affected. Servers that do not request client certificates are not vulnerable to client-initiated attacks.

Users can mitigate this issue by setting SSL_OP_NO_RX_CERTIFICATE_COMPRESSION to disable receiving compressed certificates.

The FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4 and 3.3 are not affected by this issue, as the TLS implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.

OpenSSL 3.6, 3.5, 3.4 and 3.3 are vulnerable to this issue.

OpenSSL 3.0, 1.1.1 and 1.0.2 are not affected by this issue.

CVSS v3
5.9
EG Score
5.9(medium)
EPSS
32.5%
KEV
Not listed

Published

January 27, 2026

Last Modified

February 2, 2026

Patch Availability(9)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntuopenssl-provider-legacy (3.5.3-1ubuntu3) @ questing2026-06-08ubuntu
redhatopenssl-main-3.5.6-0.1.hum12026-04-09redhat
redhatrhui5/rhua-rhel9:17736701372026-03-18redhat
redhatcostmanagement/costmanagement-metrics-rhel9-operator:17708363492026-02-24redhat
redhatrhui5/installer-rhel9:17706469252026-02-11redhat
redhatinsights-proxy/insights-proxy-container-rhel9:17707404052026-02-10redhat
redhatdiscovery/discovery-ui-rhel9:17691117742026-02-02redhat
redhatopenssl-1:3.5.1-7.el9_72026-01-28redhat
redhatopenssl-1:3.5.1-7.el10_12026-01-28redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(3)

Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 47× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-13 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-13 14:07 UTCOSV refresh
  7. 2026-07-13 06:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-08 15:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-07 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-05 02:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-05 02:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-04 06:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-04 06:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-01 15:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-01 15:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 59 more
  1. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-06-28 04:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-06-25 11:01 UTCOSV refresh
  8. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-17 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-15 17:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-15 17:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-14 23:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-13 23:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-13 23:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-12 23:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-11 14:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-10 22:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-10 22:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-10 13:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-08 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-08 02:31 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-06-08 02:31 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-06-08 02:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  38. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-05 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-05 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-04 13:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-04 13:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-02 20:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-05-31 00:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-05-31 00:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-05-29 15:12 UTCEG score recompute
  57. 2026-05-29 15:12 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-05-29 15:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  59. 2026-05-29 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2025-66199?
CVE-2025-66199 is a medium vulnerability published on January 27, 2026. Issue summary: A TLS 1.3 connection using certificate compression can be forced to allocate a large buffer before decompression without checking against the configured certificate size limit. Impact summary: An attacker can cause per-connection memory allocations of up to approximately 22 MiB and…
When was CVE-2025-66199 disclosed?
CVE-2025-66199 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on January 27, 2026, with the most recent update on February 2, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2025-66199 actively exploited?
CVE-2025-66199 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 32.5% percentile likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days — higher percentiles indicate greater predicted risk.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-66199?
CVE-2025-66199 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.9 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2025-66199?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2025-66199, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2025-66199

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-66199?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.