CVE-2025-69419

HIGHNVD 7.47.4
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 7.4 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-01-27. NVD baseline CVSS 7.4; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Trending — Patch released this week
7.4EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.6%CVSS: 7.4Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Issue summary: Calling PKCS12_get_friendlyname() function on a maliciously crafted PKCS#12 file with a BMPString (UTF-16BE) friendly name containing non-ASCII BMP code point can trigger a one byte write before the allocated buffer.

Impact summary: The out-of-bounds write can cause a memory corruption which can have various consequences including a Denial of Service.

The OPENSSL_uni2utf8() function performs a two-pass conversion of a PKCS#12 BMPString (UTF-16BE) to UTF-8. In the second pass, when emitting UTF-8 bytes, the helper function bmp_to_utf8() incorrectly forwards the remaining UTF-16 source byte count as the destination buffer capacity to UTF8_putc(). For BMP code points above U+07FF, UTF-8 requires three bytes, but the forwarded capacity can be just two bytes. UTF8_putc() then returns -1, and this negative value is added to the output length without validation, causing the length to become negative. The subsequent trailing NUL byte is then written at a negative offset, causing write outside of heap allocated buffer.

The vulnerability is reachable via the public PKCS12_get_friendlyname() API when parsing attacker-controlled PKCS#12 files. While PKCS12_parse() uses a different code path that avoids this issue, PKCS12_get_friendlyname() directly invokes the vulnerable function. Exploitation requires an attacker to provide a malicious PKCS#12 file to be parsed by the application and the attacker can just trigger a one zero byte write before the allocated buffer. For that reason the issue was assessed as Low severity according to our Security Policy.

The FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the PKCS#12 implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.

OpenSSL 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.0 and 1.1.1 are vulnerable to this issue.

OpenSSL 1.0.2 is not affected by this issue.

CVSS v3
7.4
EG Score
7.4HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
34
EG Risk 34/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity74% × 45%
The EG Score, 7.4 of 10.
Exploitation0.6% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.6%
EPSS %ILE
48th
KEV
Not listed

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

January 27, 2026

Last Modified

October 15, 2026

Advisory Details (7)

Auto-updated Aug 6, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github_commit.
GitHub commit

commit ff6289337550 (openssl/openssl)

Fix landed in openssl/openssl commit ff6289337550 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/ff628933755075446bca8307e8417c14d164b535
GitHub commit

commit cda12de3bc0e (openssl/openssl)

Fix landed in openssl/openssl commit cda12de3bc0e — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/cda12de3bc0e333ea8d2c6fd15001dbdaf280015
GitHub commit

commit a26a90d38ede (openssl/openssl)

Fix landed in openssl/openssl commit a26a90d38ede — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/a26a90d38edec3748566129d824e664b54bee2e2
GitHub commit

commit 7e9cac9832e4 (openssl/openssl)

Fix landed in openssl/openssl commit 7e9cac9832e4 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/7e9cac9832e4705b91987c2474ed06a37a93cecb
GitHub commit

commit 41be0f216404 (openssl/openssl)

Fix landed in openssl/openssl commit 41be0f216404 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/41be0f216404f14457bbf3b9cc488dba60b49296

Patch Availability(28)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatcert-manager/cert-manager-operator-rhel9:17890290762026-10-13redhat
redhatcert-manager/jetstack-cert-manager-rhel9:17914597112026-10-13redhat
redhatcert-manager/cert-manager-istio-csr-rhel9:17914597592026-10-13redhat
redhatcompat-openssl11-1:1.1.1k-5.el9_8.22026-05-19redhat
redhatopenshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9:414.92.202605060243-02026-05-13redhat
redhatopenshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9:415.92.202605060220-02026-05-13redhat
redhatopenshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9:413.92.202604080111-02026-04-16redhat
redhatopenssl-main-3.5.6-0.1.hum12026-04-09redhat
redhatopenshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9:416.94.202603231244-02026-04-02redhat
redhatcompat-openssl11-1:1.1.1k-4.el9_2.12026-03-23redhat
redhatcompat-openssl11-1:1.1.1k-4.el9_0.12026-03-23redhat
redhatrhui5/rhua-rhel9:17736701372026-03-18redhat
redhatcompat-openssl11-1:1.1.1k-5.el9_4.22026-03-17redhat
redhatcompat-openssl11-1:1.1.1k-5.el9_6.22026-03-17redhat
redhatopenshift/ose-rhel-coreos-8:412.86.202603041314-02026-03-12redhat
redhatcompat-openssl11-1:1.1.1k-5.el9_7.12026-03-12redhat
redhatopenssl-1:1.1.1c-21.el8_2.22026-03-10redhat
redhatopenssl-1:1.1.1g-18.el8_4.22026-03-10redhat
redhatopenssl-1:1.1.1k-15.el8_62026-02-26redhat
redhatcostmanagement/costmanagement-metrics-rhel9-operator:17708363492026-02-24redhat
redhatjbcs-httpd24-openssl-pkcs11-0:0.4.12-5.el7jbcs2026-02-23redhat
redhatopenssl2026-02-23redhat
redhatrhui5/installer-rhel9:17706469252026-02-11redhat
redhatinsights-proxy/insights-proxy-container-rhel9:17707404052026-02-10redhat
redhatopenssl-1:3.0.1-46.el9_0.72026-02-02redhat
redhatdiscovery/discovery-ui-rhel9:17691117742026-02-02redhat
redhatopenssl-1:3.0.7-29.el9_4.22026-01-29redhat
redhatopenssl-1:3.0.7-18.el9_2.32026-01-29redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(10 across 10 ecosystems)
Alpine:v3.17(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
openssl—
  • 1.1.1 up to 3.0.19-r0: fixed in 3.0.19-r0
—
Alpine:v3.20(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
openssl—
  • 1.1.1 up to 3.3.6-r0: fixed in 3.3.6-r0
—
Alpine:v3.21(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
openssl—
  • 1.1.1 up to 3.3.6-r0: fixed in 3.3.6-r0
—
Alpine:v3.22(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
openssl—
  • 1.1.1 up to 3.5.5-r0: fixed in 3.5.5-r0
—
Alpine:v3.23(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
openssl—
  • 1.1.1 up to 3.5.5-r0: fixed in 3.5.5-r0
—
Alpine:v3.24(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
openssl—
  • 1.1.1 up to 3.5.5-r0: fixed in 3.5.5-r0
—
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
openssl1.1.1k-1 ... 1.1.1w-0~deb11u1 (20 versions)
  • every version up to 1.1.1w-0+deb11u5: fixed in 1.1.1w-0+deb11u5
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
openssl3.0.10-1 ... 3.0.9-1 (18 versions)
  • every version up to 3.0.18-1~deb12u2: fixed in 3.0.18-1~deb12u2
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
openssl3.5.1-1, 3.5.1-1+deb13u1, 3.5.2-1, 3.5.3-1, 3.5.4-1~deb13u1
  • every version up to 3.5.4-1~deb13u2: fixed in 3.5.4-1~deb13u2
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
openssl3.5.1-1 ... 3.5.5-1~deb13u2 (8 versions)
  • every version up to 3.5.5-1: fixed in 3.5.5-1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(16)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 15× in last 7d / 34× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 99 of 227 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 1 repeat row among the latest 100 is merged into the row it repeats. The 128 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-15 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  2. 2026-10-15 01:42 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-15 01:42 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-10-15 01:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x77r-97gw-wh89 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
  5. 2026-10-14 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  6. 2026-10-13 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  7. 2026-10-12 16:46 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  9. 2026-10-11 20:21 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-11 18:33 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-11 15:07 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-11 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  13. 2026-10-10 19:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  14. 2026-10-09 20:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  15. 2026-10-09 12:25 UTCOSV refresh
  16. 2026-10-08 17:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  17. 2026-10-07 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  18. 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  19. 2026-10-05 17:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  20. 2026-10-04 23:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  21. 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  22. 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  23. 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  24. 2026-09-29 15:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  25. 2026-09-28 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
Show 74 more
  1. 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  2. 2026-09-24 14:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  3. 2026-09-23 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  4. 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  5. 2026-09-19 19:33 UTCOSV refresh
  6. 2026-09-18 19:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  7. 2026-09-17 19:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  8. 2026-09-16 14:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
  9. 2026-09-16 05:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
  10. 2026-09-15 03:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
  11. 2026-09-13 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
  12. 2026-09-12 15:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
  13. 2026-09-11 14:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
  14. 2026-09-11 09:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
  15. 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
  16. 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
  17. 2026-09-07 16:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
  18. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
  19. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
  20. 2026-09-02 14:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
  21. 2026-09-01 13:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
  22. 2026-08-31 23:04 UTCOSV refresh
  23. 2026-08-30 01:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
  24. 2026-08-28 21:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
  25. 2026-08-27 14:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
  26. 2026-08-26 14:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
  27. 2026-08-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 43rd percentile
  28. 2026-08-24 14:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 43rd percentile
  29. 2026-08-23 00:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
  30. 2026-08-21 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
  31. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
  32. 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
  33. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  34. 2026-08-17 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  35. 2026-08-16 14:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  36. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  37. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  38. 2026-08-15 00:13 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-08-15 00:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x77r-97gw-wh89 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
  40. 2026-08-14 12:11 UTCEG score recompute
  41. 2026-08-14 12:11 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-08-14 12:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x77r-97gw-wh89 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
  43. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  44. 2026-08-13 04:16 UTCEG score recompute
  45. 2026-08-13 04:16 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-08-13 04:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x77r-97gw-wh89 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
  47. 2026-08-12 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  48. 2026-08-11 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  49. 2026-08-10 23:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  50. 2026-08-10 10:25 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-08-10 10:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x77r-97gw-wh89 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
  52. 2026-08-09 17:58 UTCEG score recompute
  53. 2026-08-09 17:58 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-08-09 17:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x77r-97gw-wh89 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
  55. 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  56. 2026-08-08 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  57. 2026-08-07 23:24 UTCEG score recompute
  58. 2026-08-07 23:24 UTCVendor advisory
  59. 2026-08-07 23:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x77r-97gw-wh89 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
  60. 2026-08-07 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  61. 2026-08-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  62. 2026-08-06 04:53 UTCEG score recompute
  63. 2026-08-06 04:53 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-08-06 04:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x77r-97gw-wh89 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
  65. 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  66. 2026-08-04 10:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  67. 2026-08-03 10:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  68. 2026-08-02 22:02 UTCEG score recompute
  69. 2026-08-02 22:02 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-08-02 22:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x77r-97gw-wh89 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
  71. 2026-08-02 02:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  72. 2026-08-01 04:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  73. 2026-07-31 06:12 UTCOSV refresh
  74. 2026-07-30 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2025-69419?
CVE-2025-69419 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on January 27, 2026. Issue summary: Calling PKCS12getfriendlyname() function on a maliciously crafted PKCS#12 file with a BMPString (UTF-16BE) friendly name containing non-ASCII BMP code point can trigger a one byte write before the allocated buffer. Impact summary: The out-of-bounds write can cause a memory corruption…
When was CVE-2025-69419 made public?
CVE-2025-69419 was made public on January 27, 2026: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, OpenSSL Software Foundation, gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on January 27, 2026. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 15, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2025-69419 actively exploited?
CVE-2025-69419 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.6% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (48th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-69419?
CVE-2025-69419 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.4 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2025-69419?
A fix for CVE-2025-69419 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2025-69419 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2025-69419

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-69419?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.