CVE-2023-48022

CRITICALNVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2023-11-28. NVD baseline CVSS 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Trending — 5 sources updated this weekWeaponized
9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High exploitation likelihood — EPSS 84%
  • Public exploit code is available (Metasploit, other public proof-of-concept code)
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 84%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: Metasploit · other public PoCExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Anyscale Ray 2.6.3 and 2.8.0 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the job submission API. NOTE: the vendor's position is that this report is irrelevant because Ray, as stated in its documentation, is not intended for use outside of a strictly controlled network environment. (Also, within that environment, customers at version 2.52.0 and later can choose to use token authentication.)

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
93
EG Risk 93/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity98% × 45%
The EG Score, 9.8 of 10.
Exploitation84% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
84%
EPSS %ILE
99th
KEV
Not listed

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

November 28, 2023

Last Modified

June 17, 2026

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated Oct 5, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

The story of ShadowRay (CVE-2023-48022) - vsociety

https://www.vicarius.io/vsociety/posts/the-story-of-shadowray-cve-2023-48022
Web page

ShadowRay (CVE-2023-48022) - exploit - vsociety

https://www.vicarius.io/vsociety/posts/shadowray-cve-2023-48022-exploit
Web page

Ray, Versions 2.6.3, 2.8.0 | Bishop Fox

https://bishopfox.com/blog/ray-versions-2-6-3-2-8-0
Web page

Security — Ray 2.58.0

https://docs.ray.io/en/latest/ray-security/index.html
Web page

Ray token authentication — Ray 2.58.0

https://docs.ray.io/en/latest/ray-security/token-auth.html

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2023-48022(5)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(6)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatrhaiis/vllm-cuda-rhel9:17721605932026-02-27redhat
redhatrhaiis/vllm-rocm-rhel9:17721606252026-02-27redhat
redhatrhaiis/vllm-cuda-rhel9:3.2.2-17653790882025-12-10redhat
redhatrhaiis/vllm-rocm-rhel9:3.2.2-17653790492025-12-10redhat
redhatrhaiis/model-opt-cuda-rhel9:3.2.2-17648717962025-12-10redhat
pipray—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
PyPI(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
ray0.1.1 ... 2.9.3 (116 versions)
  • every version through 2.49.2: no fix on record
—

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 23× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 81 of 88 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 19 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 7 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-13 14:22 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-13 14:22 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-10-13 14:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6wgj-66m2-xxp2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  4. 2026-10-12 16:22 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-12 16:22 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-10-12 16:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6wgj-66m2-xxp2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  7. 2026-10-12 14:24 UTCOSV refresh
  8. 2026-10-11 21:42 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-09 20:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  10. 2026-10-06 15:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  11. 2026-09-30 16:33 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-09-30 15:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  13. 2026-09-28 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  14. 2026-09-26 00:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  15. 2026-09-24 14:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  16. 2026-09-22 15:22 UTCOSV refresh
  17. 2026-09-22 14:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  18. 2026-09-21 20:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  19. 2026-09-18 19:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  20. 2026-09-17 19:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  21. 2026-09-16 14:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  22. 2026-09-16 05:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  23. 2026-09-15 03:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  24. 2026-09-13 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  25. 2026-09-08 21:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
Show 56 more
  1. 2026-09-07 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  2. 2026-09-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  3. 2026-09-05 15:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  4. 2026-09-04 05:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  5. 2026-09-03 12:29 UTCOSV refresh
  6. 2026-09-01 04:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  7. 2026-08-30 19:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  8. 2026-08-28 21:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  9. 2026-08-27 14:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  10. 2026-08-25 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  11. 2026-08-24 14:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  12. 2026-08-20 22:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  13. 2026-08-17 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  14. 2026-08-17 01:48 UTCOSV refresh
  15. 2026-08-15 01:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  16. 2026-08-12 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  17. 2026-08-09 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  18. 2026-08-08 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  19. 2026-08-07 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  20. 2026-08-04 15:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  21. 2026-08-01 20:06 UTCOSV refresh
  22. 2026-08-01 04:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  23. 2026-07-30 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  24. 2026-07-30 01:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  25. 2026-07-27 14:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  26. 2026-07-26 14:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  27. 2026-07-24 14:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  28. 2026-07-23 02:28 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-07-22 23:14 UTCEG score recompute
  30. 2026-07-22 14:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 82% · 99th percentile
  31. 2026-07-20 17:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 82% · 99th percentile
  32. 2026-07-16 17:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 82% · 99th percentile
  33. 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 82% · 99th percentile
  34. 2026-07-15 03:19 UTCOSV refresh
  35. 2026-07-13 22:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 82% · 99th percentile
  36. 2026-07-11 08:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 82% · 99th percentile
  37. 2026-07-08 15:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 82% · 99th percentile
  38. 2026-07-04 06:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 82% · 99th percentile
  39. 2026-07-01 15:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 82% · 99th percentile
  40. 2026-06-27 03:37 UTCOSV refresh
  41. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 82% · 99th percentile
  42. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 82% · 99th percentile
  43. 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 82% · 99th percentile
  44. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 82% · 99th percentile
  45. 2026-06-17 17:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 82% · 99th percentile
  46. 2026-06-15 17:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 82% · 99th percentile
  47. 2026-06-12 23:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 92% · 99th percentile
  48. 2026-06-10 13:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 92% · 99th percentile
  49. 2026-06-09 14:17 UTCOSV refresh
  50. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 92% · 99th percentile
  51. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 92% · 99th percentile
  52. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 92% · 99th percentile
  53. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 92% · 99th percentile
  54. 2026-05-31 00:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 92% · 99th percentile
  55. 2026-05-28 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 92% · 99th percentile
  56. 2026-05-27 13:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 92% · 99th percentile

Publicly available exploits

(4 references)

Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 Metasploit module, 2 GitHub PoCs), as is 1 Nuclei detection template. A detection template checks whether a system is affected; it is not necessarily exploit code. Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly.

  • Metasploitexploit/linux/http/ray_agent_job_rce✓ verified
    Published Aug 23, 2024

    Ray Agent Job RCE

    Open source ↗
  • Nucleihttp/cves/2023/CVE-2023-48022.yaml
    Published Jun 23, 2025

    Anyscale Ray - Remote Code Execution

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCjakabakos/ShadowRay-RCE-PoC-CVE-2023-48022
    Published Mar 29, 2024

    ShadowRay RCE POC (CVE-2023-48022)

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoC0x656565/CVE-2023-48022
    Published Jan 10, 2024

    CVE-2023-48022 exploit modified from Bishop Fox work

    Open source ↗

Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2023-48022?
CVE-2023-48022 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on November 28, 2023. Anyscale Ray 2.6.3 and 2.8.0 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the job submission API. NOTE: the vendor's position is that this report is irrelevant because Ray, as stated in its documentation, is not intended for use outside of a strictly controlled network environment. (Also,…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2023-48022 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2023-48022 was published on November 28, 2023. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of June 17, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2023-48022 actively exploited?
CVE-2023-48022 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. EchelonGraph's EG-KEV model places it in Tier 2 (Weaponized), which is not evidence of exploitation: a Metasploit module exists for it, and CISA's SSVC data says a public PoC exists and its EPSS is 50% or more. EchelonGraph does not test whether exploit code works. FIRST EPSS estimates a 84% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (99th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2023-48022?
CVE-2023-48022 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2023-48022?
A fix for CVE-2023-48022 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2023-48022 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2023-48022

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2023-48022?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.

Book a Demo →Browse All CVEs