CVE-2026-89422

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.39.3—
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

This critical-severity CVE scores 9.3 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.5% (37th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: epss, secondary
Trending — 3 sources updated this week
9.3EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.5%CVSS: 9.3Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Key Exchange without Entity Authentication vulnerability in Erlang/OTP ssl allows a peer that answers a TLS 1.3 client connection to impersonate the intended server. A pre_shared_key extension in the ServerHello that the client never offered causes the client to complete the handshake without validating the server's certificate, so ssl:connect returns {ok, Socket} against a peer holding no certificate, no private key and no prior session.

tls_client_connection_1_3:handle_server_hello/2 passes the received extension to tls_gen_connection_1_3:handle_resumption/2, which sets resumption = true on its mere presence without checking that the client offered a PSK. tls_handshake_1_3:get_pre_shared_key/4 meanwhile falls back to the all-zero "no PSK" value and keys the handshake with the ordinary non-PSK schedule, so the attacker's own ephemeral key suffices. The resumption flag then routes maybe_resumption/1 straight to wait_finished, skipping the certificate-handling states, so certificate path validation, verify_fun, hostname verification, partial_chain, CRL checking and OCSP stapling are all bypassed. The default client configuration is affected; clients restricted to TLS 1.2 are not.

This issue affects OTP from OTP 22.2 before OTP 27.3.4.18, OTP 28.5.0.7, and OTP 29.1.1, corresponding to ssl from 9.5 before 11.2.12.13, 11.6.0.6, and 11.7.7.

CVSS v3
9.3
EG Score
9.3CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
57
EG Risk 57/100CISA SSVC

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity93% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA SSVC: Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.5%
EPSS %ILE
37th
KEV
Not listed

CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table

Published

September 22, 2026

Last Modified

September 22, 2026

Advisory Details (8)

Auto-updated Oct 3, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github_commit, github.
generic

Versions — Erlang System Documentation v29.1.1

https://www.erlang.org/doc/system/versions.html#order-of-versions
generic

OSV - Open Source Vulnerabilities

https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-89422
github Patch Available

TLS 1.3 Client Skips Server Authentication on Unsolicited PSK · Advisory · erlang/otp · GitHub

https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-rgxr-4g4w-j875
github_commit

commit fd1d9d07fc92 (erlang/otp)

Fix landed in erlang/otp commit fd1d9d07fc92 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/erlang/otp/commit/fd1d9d07fc92ec0d59f96dfb66182195882bb7dd
github_commit

commit afec5156361b (erlang/otp)

Fix landed in erlang/otp commit afec5156361b — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/erlang/otp/commit/afec5156361bb50d3607c7c1a453c19b9149b324
github_commit

commit 98c66c858113 (erlang/otp)

Fix landed in erlang/otp commit 98c66c858113 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/erlang/otp/commit/98c66c858113949c4262d26cd7d426c4b09d2b35
github_commit

commit 21b8a1b0ad0a (erlang/otp)

Fix landed in erlang/otp commit 21b8a1b0ad0a — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/erlang/otp/commit/21b8a1b0ad0adf200682b3854bc50114ab2b8c62

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-89422(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(3 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
erlang1:25.2.3+dfsg-1 ... 1:29.0~rc3+dfsg-4 (79 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
erlang1:27.3.4.1+dfsg-1 ... 1:29.0~rc3+dfsg-4 (40 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
erlang1:27.3.4.1+dfsg-1 ... 1:29.0~rc3+dfsg-4 (37 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 50× in last 7d / 88× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-10-05 08:09 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-10-05 03:46 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-05 03:46 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-10-04 23:23 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-10-04 18:59 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-10-04 14:30 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-10-04 10:07 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-10-04 05:43 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-10-04 01:20 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-10-03 20:54 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-10-03 16:32 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-03 16:32 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-10-03 12:09 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-10-03 07:45 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-10-03 03:19 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-10-02 22:56 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-02 18:30 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-02 18:30 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-10-02 14:07 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-10-02 09:44 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-10-02 05:21 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-10-02 00:55 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-10-01 20:32 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-01 20:32 UTCVendor advisory
Show 63 more
  1. 2026-10-01 19:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-10-01 15:57 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-10-01 11:34 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-10-01 07:10 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-10-01 02:47 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-09-30 22:24 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-09-30 18:01 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-09-30 18:01 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-09-30 13:30 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-09-30 09:08 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-09-30 04:43 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-09-30 00:20 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-09-29 19:32 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-09-29 19:32 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-09-29 15:08 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-09-29 10:44 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-09-29 06:13 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-09-29 01:50 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-09-29 01:50 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-09-28 21:27 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-09-28 17:04 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-09-28 17:04 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-09-28 12:28 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-09-28 08:05 UTCVendor advisory
  27. 2026-09-28 03:37 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-09-27 23:12 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-09-27 18:48 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-09-27 14:24 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-09-27 14:24 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-09-27 10:01 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-09-27 05:38 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-09-27 01:14 UTCVendor advisory
  36. 2026-09-26 20:48 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-09-26 16:20 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-09-26 16:20 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-09-26 11:57 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-09-26 07:34 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-09-26 03:09 UTCEG score recompute
  43. 2026-09-26 03:09 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-09-25 22:44 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-09-25 18:20 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-09-25 13:06 UTCVendor advisory
  47. 2026-09-25 08:43 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-09-25 04:20 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-09-24 23:57 UTCVendor advisory
  50. 2026-09-24 19:29 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-09-24 15:06 UTCEG score recompute
  52. 2026-09-24 15:06 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-09-24 10:43 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-09-23 21:34 UTCEG score recompute
  56. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-09-22 18:43 UTCEG score recompute
  58. 2026-09-22 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-09-22 14:20 UTCEG score recompute
  60. 2026-09-22 13:27 UTCEG score recompute
  61. 2026-09-22 09:34 UTCEG score recompute
  62. 2026-09-22 08:56 UTCEG score recompute
  63. 2026-09-22 08:55 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-89422?
CVE-2026-89422 is a critical vulnerability published on September 22, 2026. Key Exchange without Entity Authentication vulnerability in Erlang/OTP ssl allows a peer that answers a TLS 1.3 client connection to impersonate the intended server. A presharedkey extension in the ServerHello that the client never offered causes the client to complete the handshake without…
When was CVE-2026-89422 disclosed?
CVE-2026-89422 was first published on September 22, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-89422 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-89422 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.5% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (37th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-89422?
CVE-2026-89422 has a CVSS base score of 9.3 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-89422?
A fix for CVE-2026-89422 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-89422 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-89422

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-89422?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.