CVE-2026-69664

HIGHPre-NVD 8.78.7
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

This high-severity CVE scores 8.7 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.7%, top 49% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: epss, secondary
Trending — 3 sources updated this weekElevated
8.7EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 1%CVSS: 8.7Exploit: Elevated riskExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

Missing Release of Resource after Effective Lifetime vulnerability in Erlang/OTP inets httpd allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to cause denial of service by sending a request with a chunked body whose chunk-size line is not a hexadecimal number. The worker serving the connection is never released and no timeout reclaims it, so repeating the request across connections occupies every available worker and denies service to legitimate clients. No authentication is required and the default configuration is affected.

The chunk-size line must arrive in a write separate from the headers. When the body accompanies the headers, httpd_request_handler:handle_body/3 calls http_chunk:decode/3 inside a try ... catch throw:Error, so the {error, {chunk_size, _}} thrown by http_chunk:decode_size/4 is answered with 400 Bad Request. When the chunk size arrives later, the decoder is resumed through a bare catch in httpd_request_handler:handle_info/2, which converts the throw into a return value rather than raising it; the resulting error tuple is then treated as the next decoder continuation, the socket is re-armed, and the worker waits for data that never comes. The request timeout has already been cancelled at the point the headers were accepted, and the periodic byte-rate check is only armed when minimum_bytes_per_second is configured, which it is not by default.

This issue affects OTP from OTP 18.1.4 before OTP 27.3.4.17, from OTP 28.0 before OTP 28.5.0.6, and from OTP 29.0 before OTP 29.0.6, corresponding to inets from 6.0.3 before 9.3.2.7, from 9.4 before 9.6.2.3, and from 9.7 before 9.7.2.

CVSS v3
8.7
EG Score
8.7(medium)
EG Risk
70(Attend)
EG Risk 70/100SSVC: Attend

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity87% × 45%
Exploitation40% × 40%
Automatability100% × 15%
Action: Remediate soon — notable exploitation risk.
EPSS PROB
1%
EPSS %ILE
51%
KEV
Not listed

Published

September 1, 2026

Last Modified

September 8, 2026

Advisory Details (7)

Auto-updated Sep 1, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github, github_commit.
github_commit

commit bd4e74348c6b (erlang/otp)

Fix landed in erlang/otp commit bd4e74348c6b — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/erlang/otp/commit/bd4e74348c6be8a49f060da6fd48d43f3a960292
github_commit

commit df1a9ca4666e (erlang/otp)

Fix landed in erlang/otp commit df1a9ca4666e — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/erlang/otp/commit/df1a9ca4666e2fdfc44886bfaae76de086d803f6
github_commit

commit a3adf6307843 (erlang/otp)

Fix landed in erlang/otp commit a3adf6307843 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/erlang/otp/commit/a3adf63078438c86527d704e23282b7721d8ca12
generic

Versions — Erlang System Documentation v29.0.6

https://www.erlang.org/doc/system/versions.html#order-of-versions
generic

OSV - Open Source Vulnerabilities

https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-69664
github Patch Available

Denial of Service via Malformed Chunk Size in httpd · Advisory · erlang/otp · GitHub

https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-mr35-8h7w-w3gq

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-69664(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
redhaterlang27-main-27.3.4.17-0.1.hum12026-09-02redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(3 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
erlang1:25.2.3+dfsg-1 ... 1:29.0~rc3+dfsg-4 (79 versions)
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
erlang1:27.3.4.1+dfsg-1 ... 1:29.0~rc3+dfsg-4 (40 versions)
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
erlang1:27.3.4.1+dfsg-1 ... 1:29.0~rc3+dfsg-4 (37 versions)

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 23× in last 7d / 66× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-09-19 10:05 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-09-18 21:38 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-09-18 21:38 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-09-18 09:11 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-09-17 20:44 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-09-17 20:44 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-09-17 07:45 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-09-16 19:17 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-09-16 19:17 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-09-16 06:49 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-09-16 06:49 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-09-15 18:22 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-09-15 05:35 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-09-15 05:35 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-09-14 16:22 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-09-14 03:55 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-09-14 03:55 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-09-13 15:28 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-09-13 03:01 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-09-13 03:01 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-09-12 14:34 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-09-12 02:07 UTCEG score recompute
Show 41 more
  1. 2026-09-12 02:07 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-09-11 13:39 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-09-11 13:39 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-09-11 09:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-09-11 01:12 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-09-10 12:45 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-09-10 12:45 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-09-10 00:18 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-09-09 11:50 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-09-08 23:23 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-09-08 23:23 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-09-08 01:28 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-09-08 01:28 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-09-08 01:15 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-09-08 01:15 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-09-07 14:55 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-09-07 01:58 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-09-07 01:58 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-09-06 13:29 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-09-06 01:02 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-09-06 01:02 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-09-05 15:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-09-05 12:34 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-09-05 00:07 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-09-05 00:07 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-09-04 11:40 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-09-04 11:40 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-09-04 05:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-09-03 23:13 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-09-03 10:46 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-09-02 22:17 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-09-01 18:24 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-09-01 17:49 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-09-01 15:38 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-09-01 15:13 UTCEG score recompute
  41. 2026-09-01 15:12 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-69664?
CVE-2026-69664 is a high vulnerability published on September 1, 2026. Missing Release of Resource after Effective Lifetime vulnerability in Erlang/OTP inets httpd allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to cause denial of service by sending a request with a chunked body whose chunk-size line is not a hexadecimal number. The worker serving the connection is never…
When was CVE-2026-69664 disclosed?
CVE-2026-69664 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on September 1, 2026, with the most recent update on September 8, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-69664 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-69664 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 48.8% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-69664?
CVE-2026-69664 has a CVSS v3 base score of 8.7 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-69664?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-69664, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-69664

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-69664?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.