undici's retry handler can leave an already-exposed response body pending forever. When a server returns a successful response that declares a Content-Length, sends only part of the body, and closes the connection, the retry handler retries the request. If the retry returns a non-retryable status such as 400, the handler forwards that new response downstream and replaces its internal response stream, but the original response body that the application still holds is never ended or destroyed. As a result calls that read that body never settle, and the configured body timeout does not fire because its timer is tied to the connection parser rather than the orphaned body. An attacker-controlled server can trigger this with two short responses without keeping a connection open, and repeated requests accumulate pending promises and streams that can exhaust application concurrency or memory. This affects undici versions from 7.11.0 up to 7.29.1 and from 8.0.0 up to 8.10.2. Users should upgrade to undici 7.29.1 or 8.10.2.
CVE-2026-18149
This medium-severity CVE scores 5.9 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.3%, top 77% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 5.9
- EG Score
- 5.9(medium)
- EG Risk
- 27(Track)EG Risk 27/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity59% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- 0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 23%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
September 4, 2026
Last Modified
September 8, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Sep 4, 2026Security Advisories | OpenJS Foundation CVE Numbering Authority
https://cna.openjsf.org/security-advisories.htmlundici vulnerable to Denial of Service via orphaned RetryHandler response body · Advisory · nodejs/undici · GitHub
https://github.com/nodejs/undici/security/advisories/GHSA-pmjh-fq2x-6v4xVendor Advisories for CVE-2026-18149(3)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- RHSA-2026:66008Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs bug fix and enhancement update
- RHSA-2026:54438Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs bug fix and enhancement update
- RHSA-2026:54389Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs Security Update
Patch Availability(3)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fixed in / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | grafana12-4-main-12.4.10-0.2.hum1 | 2026-09-09 | redhat |
| redhat | nodejs26-main-26.7.0-1.5.2.hum1 | 2026-08-12 | redhat |
| redhat | nodejs24-main-24.18.1-0.2.2.hum1 | 2026-08-12 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(3 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| node-undici | 5.15.0+dfsg1+~cs20.10.9.3-1 ... 8.9.0+dfsg+~cs3.2.0-1 (39 versions) | — | — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| node-undici | 7.15.0+dfsg+~cs3.2.0-1 ... 8.9.0+dfsg+~cs3.2.0-1 (15 versions) | — | — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| node-undici | 7.15.0+dfsg+~cs3.2.0-1 ... 8.9.0+dfsg+~cs3.2.0-1 (15 versions) | — | — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Additional Vendor Advisories
(1)
Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 19× in last 7d / 23× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-09-11 15:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-11 15:52 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-11 14:52 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-11 09:36 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-10 17:14 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-10 17:14 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-09 18:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-09 18:33 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-08 19:56 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-08 13:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-08 13:15 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-07 14:37 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-06 15:48 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-06 15:48 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-05 17:10 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-04 18:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-04 17:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-04 17:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-04 17:29 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-18149?
When was CVE-2026-18149 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-18149 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-18149?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-18149?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-18149
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-18149?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.