undici's cache interceptor mishandles optional whitespace placed around the equals sign of a qualified no-cache or private Cache-Control directive. In undici from 7.0.0 up to before 7.29.0 and from 8.0.0 up to before 8.9.0, the parser either drops the directive or stores a field name with literal quote characters, so the cache decision fails to recognize the qualification and the response is stored. In shared-cache mode, this lets a response containing one user's authenticated data be served from cache to a later caller, including an unauthenticated one, when both requests resolve to the same cache key. It affects applications that enable the cache interceptor in shared mode, forward Authorization headers upstream, and receive cacheable responses with qualified directives padded with whitespace around the equals sign. This is the whitespace-around-equals variant that the fix for CVE-2026-9678 did not normalize, and it is fixed in undici 7.29.0 and 8.9.0.
CVE-2026-14643
This high-severity CVE scores 7.5 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 0.4% (31st percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 7.5
- EG Score
- 7.5HIGHmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 34EG Risk 34/100CISA SSVC
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity75% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%CISA SSVC: Track at every mission impact level.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 0.4%
- EPSS %ILE
- 31st
- KEV
- Not listed
CISA SSVCTrack at every mission impact level.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table
Published
July 29, 2026
Last Modified
August 4, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Jul 29, 2026Security Advisories | OpenJS Foundation CVE Numbering Authority
https://cna.openjsf.org/security-advisories.htmlundici vulnerable to cross-user information disclosure via whitespace around equals in Cache-Control directives · Advisory · nodejs/undici · GitHub
https://github.com/nodejs/undici/security/advisories/GHSA-jr45-8vmc-qm54Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-14643(3)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- GHSA-jr45-8vmc-qm54GitHub Security AdvisoriesMedium
undici vulnerable to cross-user information disclosure via whitespace around equals in Cache-Control directives
- RHSA-2026:48537Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs bug fix and enhancement update
- RHSA-2026:48273Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs bug fix and enhancement update
Patch Availability(2)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | nodejs24-main-24.18.1-0.1.hum1 | 2026-07-30 | redhat |
| redhat | nodejs26-main-26.5.1-1.5.hum1 | 2026-07-29 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| node-undici | 5.15.0+dfsg1+~cs20.10.9.3-1 ... 8.9.0+dfsg+~cs3.2.0-1 (40 versions) |
| — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| node-undici | 7.15.0+dfsg+~cs3.2.0-1 ... 8.9.0+dfsg+~cs3.2.0-1 (16 versions) |
| — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| node-undici | 7.15.0+dfsg+~cs3.2.0-1 ... 8.5.0+dfsg+~cs3.2.0-3 (14 versions) |
| — |
npm(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| undici | — |
| — |
Weakness Classification(2)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 16× in last 7d / 74× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 193 total refreshes for this CVE.
- 2026-10-05 00:05 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-05 00:05 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-04 06:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-04 06:58 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-01 03:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-01 03:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-29 15:20 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-29 07:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-29 07:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-28 08:39 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-27 19:35 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 19:35 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-27 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-25 05:30 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-25 05:30 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-24 10:56 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-23 21:47 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-23 21:47 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-23 05:18 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-22 15:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-22 15:45 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-20 00:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-20 00:20 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-19 04:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-19 04:43 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-18 19:27 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-18 15:12 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-18 01:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 01:39 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-17 01:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-17 01:34 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-16 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-16 05:47 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 05:47 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-16 05:14 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-15 07:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-15 07:45 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-14 04:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-14 04:23 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-13 16:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-13 15:19 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-13 01:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-13 01:36 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-12 15:00 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-12 12:28 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-11 22:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-11 22:02 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-11 14:52 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-11 09:36 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-11 08:53 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-10 19:48 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-10 19:48 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-10 04:29 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-09 07:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-09 07:42 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-07 20:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-07 20:36 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-06 22:31 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-06 22:31 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-06 08:07 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-05 19:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-05 19:02 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-05 05:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-05 05:08 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-04 11:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-04 11:52 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-02 14:11 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-01 22:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-01 22:45 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-01 13:53 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-01 04:39 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-31 23:52 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-31 01:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-31 01:15 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-30 12:10 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-30 12:10 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-29 23:04 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-29 23:04 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-27 20:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-27 20:54 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-27 03:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-27 03:26 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownDebian:12:node-undici
Same vendor
10 shownredhat:RHSA-2026:48273 · redhat:RHSA-2026:48537
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-14643?
When was CVE-2026-14643 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-14643 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-14643?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-14643?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-14643
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-14643?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.