CVE-2026-16728

MEDIUMNVD 6.56.5—
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

This medium-severity CVE scores 6.5 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 0.2% (6th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: epss, nvd
Trending — 3 sources updated this week
6.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 6.5Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

undici's retry interceptor can deliver a response whose body length does not match the Content-Length header exposed to the application after a retry or resume of a partial response. In undici before 6.28.0, from 7.0.0 up to before 7.29.0, and from 8.0.0 up to before 8.9.0, a malicious or faulty upstream can return a partial response with a mismatched framing header, close the socket early, and have the retry interceptor assemble a body of a different length while the original Content-Length stays attached. Applications that use the retry interceptor and forward upstream headers and bodies downstream, such as proxies or gateways, may then emit an invalid HTTP response with a stale Content-Length, leading to downstream response desynchronization, connection hangs, or response corruption. Exploitation requires the retry interceptor enabled, an upstream returning a mismatched partial response, and a downstream forwarder that does not remove or recalculate Content-Length. The issue is fixed in undici 6.28.0, 7.29.0, and 8.9.0.

CVSS v3
6.5
EG Score
6.5MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
29
EG Risk 29/100CISA SSVC

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity65% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA SSVC: Track at every mission impact level.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
6th
KEV
Not listed

CISA SSVCTrack at every mission impact level.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table

Published

July 29, 2026

Last Modified

August 4, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Jul 29, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github.
generic

Security Advisories | OpenJS Foundation CVE Numbering Authority

https://cna.openjsf.org/security-advisories.html
github Patch Available

undici vulnerable to downstream response desynchronization via retry interceptor · Advisory · nodejs/undici · GitHub

https://github.com/nodejs/undici/security/advisories/GHSA-8xcm-r25x-g524

Patch Availability(2)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatnodejs24-main-24.18.1-0.1.hum12026-07-30redhat
redhatnodejs26-main-26.5.1-1.5.hum12026-07-29redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
node-undici5.15.0+dfsg1+~cs20.10.9.3-1 ... 8.9.0+dfsg+~cs3.2.0-1 (40 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
node-undici7.15.0+dfsg+~cs3.2.0-1 ... 8.9.0+dfsg+~cs3.2.0-1 (16 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
node-undici7.15.0+dfsg+~cs3.2.0-1 ... 8.5.0+dfsg+~cs3.2.0-3 (14 versions)
  • every version up to 8.9.0+dfsg+~cs3.2.0-1: fixed in 8.9.0+dfsg+~cs3.2.0-1
—
npm(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
undici—
  • every version up to 6.28.0: fixed in 6.28.0
  • 7.0.0 up to 7.29.0: fixed in 7.29.0
  • 8.0.0 up to 8.9.0: fixed in 8.9.0
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 13× in last 7d / 62× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 155 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-10-04 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-10-04 06:58 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-04 06:58 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-10-01 03:32 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-01 03:32 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-09-29 15:20 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-09-29 07:32 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-09-29 07:32 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-09-27 19:35 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-09-27 19:35 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-09-27 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-09-25 05:30 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-09-25 05:30 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-09-23 21:47 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-09-23 21:47 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-09-22 15:45 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-09-22 15:45 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-09-20 04:36 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-09-20 04:36 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-09-19 04:43 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-09-19 04:43 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-09-18 19:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-09-18 01:39 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-09-18 01:39 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-09-16 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-09-16 11:47 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-09-16 11:47 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-09-16 05:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-09-15 07:45 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-09-15 07:45 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-09-14 07:06 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-09-14 07:06 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-09-13 16:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-09-13 07:13 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-09-13 07:13 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-09-12 15:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-09-12 07:21 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-09-12 07:21 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-09-11 14:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-09-11 09:36 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-09-11 07:28 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-09-11 07:28 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-09-10 07:36 UTCVendor advisory
  27. 2026-09-09 07:44 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-09-09 07:44 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-09-07 20:36 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-09-07 20:36 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-09-06 18:55 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-09-06 18:55 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-09-05 19:02 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-09-05 19:02 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-09-04 11:52 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-09-04 11:52 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-09-02 14:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-09-01 23:44 UTCEG score recompute
  43. 2026-09-01 23:44 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-09-01 13:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-09-01 04:39 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-08-31 23:52 UTCVendor advisory
  47. 2026-08-30 22:56 UTCEG score recompute
  48. 2026-08-30 22:56 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-08-29 23:04 UTCEG score recompute
  52. 2026-08-29 23:04 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-08-27 14:06 UTCEG score recompute
  56. 2026-08-27 14:06 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-08-26 14:14 UTCVendor advisory
  59. 2026-08-25 14:20 UTCEG score recompute
  60. 2026-08-25 14:20 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-08-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-08-24 14:07 UTCEG score recompute
  63. 2026-08-24 14:07 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-08-23 14:12 UTCEG score recompute
  65. 2026-08-23 14:12 UTCVendor advisory
  66. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-08-22 14:20 UTCEG score recompute
  68. 2026-08-22 14:20 UTCVendor advisory
  69. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-08-21 14:18 UTCEG score recompute
  71. 2026-08-21 14:18 UTCVendor advisory
  72. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-08-20 14:25 UTCEG score recompute
  74. 2026-08-20 14:25 UTCVendor advisory
  75. 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-16728?
CVE-2026-16728 is a medium vulnerability published on July 29, 2026. undici's retry interceptor can deliver a response whose body length does not match the Content-Length header exposed to the application after a retry or resume of a partial response. In undici before 6.28.0, from 7.0.0 up to before 7.29.0, and from 8.0.0 up to before 8.9.0, a malicious or faulty…
When was CVE-2026-16728 disclosed?
CVE-2026-16728 was first published on July 29, 2026, with the most recent update on August 4, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-16728 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-16728 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (6th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-16728?
CVE-2026-16728 has a CVSS v3 base score of 6.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-16728?
A fix for CVE-2026-16728 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-16728 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-16728

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-16728?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.