undici's retry interceptor can deliver a response whose body length does not match the Content-Length header exposed to the application after a retry or resume of a partial response. In undici before 6.28.0, from 7.0.0 up to before 7.29.0, and from 8.0.0 up to before 8.9.0, a malicious or faulty upstream can return a partial response with a mismatched framing header, close the socket early, and have the retry interceptor assemble a body of a different length while the original Content-Length stays attached. Applications that use the retry interceptor and forward upstream headers and bodies downstream, such as proxies or gateways, may then emit an invalid HTTP response with a stale Content-Length, leading to downstream response desynchronization, connection hangs, or response corruption. Exploitation requires the retry interceptor enabled, an upstream returning a mismatched partial response, and a downstream forwarder that does not remove or recalculate Content-Length. The issue is fixed in undici 6.28.0, 7.29.0, and 8.9.0.
CVE-2026-16728
This medium-severity CVE scores 6.5 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 0.2% (6th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 6.5
- EG Score
- 6.5MEDIUMmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 29EG Risk 29/100CISA SSVC
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity65% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%CISA SSVC: Track at every mission impact level.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 0.2%
- EPSS %ILE
- 6th
- KEV
- Not listed
CISA SSVCTrack at every mission impact level.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table
Published
July 29, 2026
Last Modified
August 4, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Jul 29, 2026Security Advisories | OpenJS Foundation CVE Numbering Authority
https://cna.openjsf.org/security-advisories.htmlundici vulnerable to downstream response desynchronization via retry interceptor · Advisory · nodejs/undici · GitHub
https://github.com/nodejs/undici/security/advisories/GHSA-8xcm-r25x-g524Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-16728(3)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- GHSA-8xcm-r25x-g524GitHub Security AdvisoriesMedium
undici vulnerable to downstream response desynchronization via retry interceptor
- RHSA-2026:48537Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs bug fix and enhancement update
- RHSA-2026:48273Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs bug fix and enhancement update
Patch Availability(2)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | nodejs24-main-24.18.1-0.1.hum1 | 2026-07-30 | redhat |
| redhat | nodejs26-main-26.5.1-1.5.hum1 | 2026-07-29 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| node-undici | 5.15.0+dfsg1+~cs20.10.9.3-1 ... 8.9.0+dfsg+~cs3.2.0-1 (40 versions) |
| — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| node-undici | 7.15.0+dfsg+~cs3.2.0-1 ... 8.9.0+dfsg+~cs3.2.0-1 (16 versions) |
| — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| node-undici | 7.15.0+dfsg+~cs3.2.0-1 ... 8.5.0+dfsg+~cs3.2.0-3 (14 versions) |
| — |
npm(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| undici | — |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 13× in last 7d / 62× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 155 total refreshes for this CVE.
- 2026-10-04 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-04 06:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-04 06:58 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-01 03:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-01 03:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-29 15:20 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-29 07:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-29 07:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-27 19:35 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 19:35 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-27 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-25 05:30 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-25 05:30 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-23 21:47 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-23 21:47 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-22 15:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-22 15:45 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-20 04:36 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-20 04:36 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-19 04:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-19 04:43 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-18 19:27 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-18 01:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 01:39 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-16 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-16 11:47 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 11:47 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-16 05:14 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-15 07:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-15 07:45 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-14 07:06 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-14 07:06 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-13 16:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-13 07:13 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-13 07:13 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-12 15:00 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-12 07:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-12 07:21 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-11 14:52 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-11 09:36 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-11 07:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-11 07:28 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-10 07:36 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-09 07:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-09 07:44 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-07 20:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-07 20:36 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-06 18:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-06 18:55 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-05 19:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-05 19:02 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-04 11:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-04 11:52 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-02 14:11 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-01 23:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-01 23:44 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-01 13:53 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-01 04:39 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-31 23:52 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-30 22:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-30 22:56 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-29 23:04 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-29 23:04 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-27 14:06 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-27 14:06 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-26 14:14 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-25 14:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-25 14:20 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-24 14:07 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-24 14:07 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-23 14:12 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-23 14:12 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-22 14:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-22 14:20 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-21 14:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-21 14:18 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-20 14:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-20 14:25 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownDebian:12:node-undici
Same vendor
10 shownredhat:RHSA-2026:48273 · redhat:RHSA-2026:48537
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-16728?
When was CVE-2026-16728 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-16728 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-16728?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-16728?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-16728
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-16728?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.