undici's cache interceptor mishandles malformed Cache-Control private directives. In undici 7.0.0 up to before 7.29.0 and 8.0.0 up to before 8.9.0, a response carrying a degenerate qualified private directive, such as private set to an empty value, can be stored in the default shared cache and later served to a different caller with the same cache key, disclosing private response bodies and headers including Set-Cookie. Separately, a Cache-Control header that combines an unqualified private directive with a qualified one triggers an uncaught TypeError in the cache-control parser, which rejects the request and, depending on the consumer's error handling, can terminate the process. Both issues affect applications using the cache interceptor in shared mode, including the default configuration. The issues are fixed in undici 7.29.0 and 8.9.0.
CVE-2026-13697
This critical-severity CVE scores 9.1 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 0.6% (45th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 9.1
- EG Score
- 9.1CRITICALmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 46EG Risk 46/100CISA SSVC
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity91% × 45%Exploitation1% × 40%Automatability30% × 15%CISA SSVC: Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 0.6%
- EPSS %ILE
- 45th
- KEV
- Not listed
CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation none (no KEV listing, exploit record or EPSS ≥ 50%) · Automatable unknown (not published for this CVE) · Technical impact total (CVSS ≥ 9.0). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table
Published
July 29, 2026
Last Modified
August 4, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Sep 16, 2026undici vulnerable to cross-user information disclosure and parse-time crash via degenerate private cache directives · Advisory · nodejs/undici · GitHub
https://github.com/nodejs/undici/security/advisories/GHSA-4cwx-7wf7-3272Security Advisories | OpenJS Foundation CVE Numbering Authority
https://cna.openjsf.org/security-advisories.htmlVendor Advisories for CVE-2026-13697(3)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- GHSA-4cwx-7wf7-3272GitHub Security AdvisoriesHigh
undici vulnerable to cross-user information disclosure and parse-time crash via degenerate private cache directives
- RHSA-2026:48537Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs bug fix and enhancement update
- RHSA-2026:48273Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs bug fix and enhancement update
Patch Availability(2)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | nodejs24-main-24.18.1-0.1.hum1 | 2026-07-30 | redhat |
| redhat | nodejs26-main-26.5.1-1.5.hum1 | 2026-07-29 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| node-undici | 5.15.0+dfsg1+~cs20.10.9.3-1 ... 8.9.0+dfsg+~cs3.2.0-1 (40 versions) |
| — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| node-undici | 7.15.0+dfsg+~cs3.2.0-1 ... 8.9.0+dfsg+~cs3.2.0-1 (16 versions) |
| — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| node-undici | 7.15.0+dfsg+~cs3.2.0-1 ... 8.5.0+dfsg+~cs3.2.0-3 (14 versions) |
| — |
npm(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| undici | — |
| — |
Weakness Classification(3)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 21× in last 7d / 116× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 324 total refreshes for this CVE.
- 2026-10-05 02:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-05 02:36 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-04 12:35 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 07:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-04 07:01 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-03 03:11 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 17:57 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 17:57 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-01 12:12 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 07:53 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 03:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-01 03:34 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-29 15:20 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-29 07:35 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-29 07:35 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-28 12:54 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-28 07:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-28 03:13 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-27 19:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 19:37 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-27 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-25 09:56 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-25 05:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-25 05:38 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-24 10:57 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-24 06:26 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-24 02:06 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-23 21:48 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-23 21:48 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-23 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-23 10:54 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-23 06:12 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-23 01:55 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-22 21:37 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-22 15:48 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-22 15:48 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-20 11:16 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-20 05:22 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-20 00:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-20 00:23 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-19 04:53 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-19 00:05 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-18 19:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 19:34 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-18 19:27 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-18 15:16 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-18 10:16 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-18 05:58 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-18 01:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 01:40 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-17 06:13 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-17 01:35 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-17 01:35 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-16 11:47 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-16 05:48 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 05:48 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-16 05:14 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-15 07:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-15 07:53 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-14 15:04 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-14 09:10 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-14 04:53 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-14 00:35 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-13 20:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-13 20:17 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-13 16:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-13 15:41 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-13 11:16 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-13 06:58 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-13 02:28 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-12 22:10 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-12 17:48 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-12 17:48 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-12 15:00 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-12 13:31 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-12 09:13 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-12 04:55 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-12 00:38 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-11 19:24 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-11 15:06 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-11 15:06 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-11 14:52 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-11 09:36 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-11 06:29 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-11 01:24 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-10 19:50 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-10 14:33 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-10 10:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-10 10:11 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-10 04:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-09 12:07 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-09 07:47 UTCEG score recompute
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownDebian:12:node-undici
Same vendor
10 shownredhat:RHSA-2026:48273 · redhat:RHSA-2026:48537
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-13697?
When was CVE-2026-13697 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-13697 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-13697?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-13697?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-13697
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-13697?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.