GitPython before 3.1.59 omits --separate-git-dir from unsafe_git_clone_options, allowing attackers to create arbitrary git directories outside the intended clone destination. Attackers can pass a separate_git_dir parameter to Repo.clone_from() or Repo.clone() to redirect repository metadata to an attacker-controlled filesystem path, enabling arbitrary directory creation and potential hook execution.
CVE-2026-78677
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
Score 7.5 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-08-25. A secondary CVSS source baseline 7.5; sources differ by 0.0.
- CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 7.5
- EG Score
- 7.5HIGHmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 65EG Risk 65/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity75% × 45%The EG Score, 7.5 of 10.Exploitation40% × 40%EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 0.7%
- EPSS %ILE
- 50th
- KEV
- Not listed
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
August 25, 2026
Last Modified
October 12, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Aug 25, 2026GitPython before 3.1.59 Path Traversal via separate-git-dir | Advisories | VulnCheck
https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/gitpython-before-path-traversal-via-separate-git-dirclone_from()/clone() omit --separate-git-dir from unsafe_git_clone_options, enabling arbitrary git-directory creation outside the destination · Advisory · gitpython-developers/GitPython · GitHub
https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython/security/advisories/GHSA-8mcc-hrx5-hvxcVendor Advisories for CVE-2026-78677(7)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- RHSA-2026:79380Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: satellite/iop-vulnerability-engine-rhel9 container image available as a Technology Preview
- RHSA-2026:79376Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Technical preview of the satellite/iop-vmaas-rhel9 container image
- RHSA-2026:79373Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: satellite/iop-vulnerability-engine-rhel9 container image available as a Technology Preview
- RHSA-2026:79372Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Technical preview of the satellite/iop-vmaas-rhel9 container image
- GHSA-8mcc-hrx5-hvxcGitHub Security AdvisoriesHigh
GitPython: clone_from()/clone() omit --separate-git-dir from unsafe_git_clone_options, enabling arbitrary git-directory creation outside the destination
- RHSA-2026:59136Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6 Product Security and Bug Fix Update
- RHSA-2026:59135Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 Product Security and Bug Fix Update
Patch Availability(5)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | satellite/iop-vmaas-rhel9:1791336955 | 2026-10-08 | redhat |
| redhat | satellite/iop-vulnerability-engine-rhel9:1791340412 | 2026-10-08 | redhat |
| redhat | satellite/iop-vmaas-rhel9:1790820070 | 2026-10-08 | redhat |
| redhat | satellite/iop-vulnerability-engine-rhel9:1791341368 | 2026-10-08 | redhat |
| redhat | python3.12-gitpython-0:3.1.59-1.el9ap | 2026-08-24 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| python-git | 3.1.30-1 ... 3.1.62-2 (13 versions) |
| — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| python-git | 3.1.44-1 ... 3.1.62-2 (7 versions) |
| — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| python-git | 3.1.44-1, 3.1.45-1, 3.1.46-1, 3.1.50-1 |
| — |
PyPI(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| gitpython | 0.1.7 ... 3.1.9 (111 versions) |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 18× in last 7d / 59× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 97 of 126 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 3 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 29 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-12 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-12 15:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 15:27 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 19:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 16:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:57 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-10 12:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-10 12:25 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-09 04:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-08 15:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-08 03:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-06 16:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-06 02:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-05 09:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-03 16:28 UTCEG score recompute
Show 72 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-03 01:48 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-01 22:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-30 20:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-29 15:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-29 15:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-29 02:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-28 00:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-26 22:12 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-26 00:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-25 00:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
- 2026-09-24 09:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-23 20:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
- 2026-09-22 19:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-22 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
- 2026-09-22 04:35 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-21 21:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
- 2026-09-21 02:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
- 2026-09-20 00:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 23:00 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
- 2026-09-17 21:10 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 14:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
- 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
- 2026-09-15 12:48 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-15 03:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
- 2026-09-13 22:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-12 20:12 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-11 18:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
- 2026-09-10 16:30 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-09 01:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
- 2026-09-08 05:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7r39-6q8m-qw68 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-09-07 16:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-07 16:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7r39-6q8m-qw68 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-09-07 03:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7r39-6q8m-qw68 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-09-06 14:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-06 14:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7r39-6q8m-qw68 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-09-06 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
- 2026-09-06 01:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-06 01:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7r39-6q8m-qw68 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-09-05 12:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7r39-6q8m-qw68 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-09-04 23:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-04 23:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7r39-6q8m-qw68 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-09-04 10:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-04 10:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7r39-6q8m-qw68 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-09-04 05:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-09-03 21:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7r39-6q8m-qw68 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-09-03 08:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7r39-6q8m-qw68 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-09-02 19:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-02 19:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7r39-6q8m-qw68 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-09-02 11:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7r39-6q8m-qw68 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-09-01 22:35 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-01 22:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7r39-6q8m-qw68 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-09-01 09:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-01 09:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7r39-6q8m-qw68 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-08-31 20:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7r39-6q8m-qw68 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-08-31 17:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7r39-6q8m-qw68 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-08-31 04:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-31 04:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7r39-6q8m-qw68 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownDebian:12:python-git
Same vendor
10 shownredhat:RHSA-2026:59135
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-78677?
When was CVE-2026-78677 made public?
Is CVE-2026-78677 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-78677?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-78677?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-78677
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-78677?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.