CVE-2026-75804

MEDIUMPre-NVD 5.35.3—
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

Score 5.3 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-09-29. CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1 baseline 5.3; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: cisa-adp, epss, ghsa
Trending — Patch released this week
5.3EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.4%CVSS: 5.3Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Issue summary: OpenSSL QUIC stack does not enforce connection level flow control for streams. Remote peers may send more bytes as long as they fit within the stream flow control limits.

Impact summary: A malicious remote peer may exploit the lack of connection flow control for streams to make the QUIC stack receive ~100MB of memory instead of 768 KiB (default flow control window size).

CWE: CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling

Description: The local QUIC stack advertises two flow control limits to its remote peer: stream flow control limit and connection flow control limit. The remote peer must follow both limits when transmitting stream data.

Whenever the local QUIC stack receives a stream frame, it validates that the size of the received stream frame stays within flow control limits. If either limit is exceeded (stream level or connection level), then the QUIC stack must close the connection with a flow control error.

The vulnerable OpenSSL QUIC stack enforces the stream-level but not the connection-level limit. To exploit the issue, three conditions must be met:

  • the remote peer opens several streams
  • each stream must stay within the stream-level flow control limit
  • there must be no zero-offset byte sent on any of the streams
(to prevent the vulnerable QUIC stack from consuming data). By meeting the conditions above, the remote peer may make the local stack allocate 2 x MAX_STREAMS x (stream flow control limit) bytes of memory. MAX_STREAMS defaults to 100, and the limit applies to both bidirectional and unidirectional streams, making it 200 in total. The default flow control window for a stream is 512kB. The remote peer may force the vulnerable QUIC stack to allocate 100MB of heap per connection.

FIPS impact: no The FIPS module is not affected as the QUIC implementation is outside of the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.

CVSS v3
5.3
EG Score
5.3MEDIUMhigh confidence
EG Risk
39
EG Risk 39/100CISA SSVC

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity53% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA SSVC: Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.4%
EPSS %ILE
26th
KEV
Not listed

CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table

Published

September 29, 2026

Last Modified

September 29, 2026

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated Sep 29, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github_commit.
github_commit

commit f9eaecf5bdd6 (openssl/openssl)

Fix landed in openssl/openssl commit f9eaecf5bdd6 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/f9eaecf5bdd6692da052bc65b0332af2a938ac03
github_commit

commit 4533ee8a5686 (openssl/openssl)

Fix landed in openssl/openssl commit 4533ee8a5686 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/4533ee8a5686c953ed3b644738ac4bdf20806538
github_commit

commit 2e8f54666b3f (openssl/openssl)

Fix landed in openssl/openssl commit 2e8f54666b3f — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/2e8f54666b3fb7b05ff5f58aa6cac9285163654e
github_commit

commit 64d3102fb5b5 (openssl/openssl)

Fix landed in openssl/openssl commit 64d3102fb5b5 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/64d3102fb5b54311e92517f26ba00169d719e74a

Patch Availability(3)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntuopenssl (3.0.13-0ubuntu3.16) @ noble2026-10-03ubuntu
redhatopenssl-main-3.5.9-0.1.hum12026-09-30redhat
redhatopenssl3-main-3.5.9-0.1.hum12026-09-30redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(1)

Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 23× in last 7d / 23× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-10-03 21:15 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-03 21:15 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-10-03 21:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-10-02 21:27 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-02 21:27 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-10-02 21:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-10-01 21:35 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-01 21:35 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-10-01 21:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-09-30 21:47 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-09-30 21:47 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-09-30 21:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-09-29 22:00 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-09-29 22:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-09-29 18:31 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-09-29 18:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-09-29 17:30 UTCEG score recompute▲ 5.30
  20. 2026-09-29 17:28 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 5.3 · severity → MEDIUM
  21. 2026-09-29 16:24 UTCNVD update
  22. 2026-09-29 15:38 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-09-29 15:38 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-75804?
CVE-2026-75804 is a medium vulnerability published on September 29, 2026. Issue summary: OpenSSL QUIC stack does not enforce connection level flow control for streams. Remote peers may send more bytes as long as they fit within the stream flow control limits. Impact summary: A malicious remote peer may exploit the lack of connection flow control for streams to make the…
When was CVE-2026-75804 disclosed?
CVE-2026-75804 was first published on September 29, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-75804 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-75804 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.4% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (26th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-75804?
CVE-2026-75804 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 5.3 (CISA-ADP / Vulnrichment enrichment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-75804?
A fix for CVE-2026-75804 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-75804 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-75804

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-75804?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.