The Smile parser in FasterXML jackson-dataformats-binary never invokes StreamReadConstraints.validateNameLength() when decoding JSON object property names, so the maxNameLength limit is not enforced for this format. SmileParser._handleLongFieldName() grows its internal name buffer through an unconstrained _growArrayTo() call and performs no length validation. An attacker who can have a Smile document parsed may therefore embed a single property name of unbounded length; the parser buffers the whole name in memory before returning it, whatever maxNameLength is configured to. Because StreamReadConstraints.maxDocumentLength is also disabled by default, nothing else bounds the name under default settings, so the only limits are the attacker's upload capacity and available heap, leading to memory exhaustion and denial of service. No privileges beyond the ability to submit data to a parsing endpoint are required, and exploitation needs only that the bytes reach SmileFactory parsing, directly or through an ObjectMapper configured with the Smile module. jackson-core's own JSON parsers enforce maxNameLength incrementally during name decoding; this gap is specific to the binary formats. maxNameLength and validateNameLength were introduced in jackson-core 2.16.0, so releases before 2.16.0 do not contain the constraint that is left unenforced. This issue is tracked together with the CBOR parser defect in the same vendor advisory, GHSA-3v8f-v6vx-fmrm, which covers both binary formats. The Smile parser defect (jackson-dataformats-binary issue #726) is CVE-2026-68496; the CBOR parser defect (issue #725) is assigned CVE-2026-68495.
CVE-2026-68496
Score 7.5 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-10-01. A secondary CVSS source baseline 7.5; sources differ by 0.0.
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 7.5
- EG Score
- 7.5HIGHhigh confidence
- EG Risk
- 39EG Risk 39/100CISA SSVC
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity75% × 45%Exploitation1% × 40%Automatability30% × 15%CISA SSVC: Track at low or medium mission impact; Track or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 0.7%
- EPSS %ILE
- 50th
- KEV
- Not listed
CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation none (no KEV listing, exploit record or EPSS ≥ 50%) · Automatable unknown (not published for this CVE) · Technical impact partial (CVSS below 9.0). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table
Published
October 1, 2026
Last Modified
October 2, 2026
Advisory Details (4)
Auto-updated Oct 1, 2026jackson-dataformats-binary/release-notes/VERSION-2.x at 2.18 · FasterXML/jackson-dataformats-binary · GitHub
https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-dataformats-binary/blob/2.18/release-notes/VERSION-2.xEnsure `maxNameLength` limit enforced for Smile parser [CVE-2026-68496] · Issue #726 · FasterXML/jackson-dataformats-binary · GitHub
https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-dataformats-binary/issues/726Missing maxNameLength enforcement in Smile and CBOR enables memory-exhaustion DoS · Advisory · FasterXML/jackson-dataformats-binary · GitHub
https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-dataformats-binary/security/advisories/GHSA-3v8f-v6vx-fmrmVendor Advisories for CVE-2026-68496(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(2)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 14× in last 7d / 14× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-10-04 07:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-03 19:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-03 19:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-03 07:07 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-02 18:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 18:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-02 07:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-01 19:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-01 19:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-01 18:30 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-01 17:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-01 17:45 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-68496?
When was CVE-2026-68496 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-68496 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-68496?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-68496?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-68496
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-68496?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.