Allocation of resources without limits or throttling in the CMP/CRMF password-based MAC verifier (PKMacBuilder) in Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. bc-csharp before 2.7.0 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to cause a denial of service through CPU exhaustion via a CMP message or CRMF certificate request whose PBMParameter declares a very large iteration count, because PKMacBuilder enforced its iteration-count ceiling only when the caller had supplied an explicit maximum through the PKMacBuilder(IPKMacPrimitivesProvider, int) constructor. With any other constructor, ProtectedPkiMessage.Verify and CertificateRequestMessage.IsValidSigningKeyPop performed as many hash iterations as the sender requested, up to about 2^31, before the MAC could be checked.
CVE-2026-63568
This high-severity CVE scores 8.7 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.3% (22nd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
An upstream fix is merged but not yet released — mitigate (WAF / firewall / segmentation) until the release ships, then apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 8.7
- EG Score
- 8.7HIGHmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 54EG Risk 54/100CISA SSVC
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity87% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability100% × 15%CISA SSVC: Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Action: An upstream fix is merged but not yet in a tagged release. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high until it ships, then apply the release. - EPSS PROB
- 0.3%
- EPSS %ILE
- 22nd
- KEV
- Not listed
CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
An upstream fix is merged but not yet in a tagged release. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high until it ships, then apply the release.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table
Published
October 2, 2026
Last Modified
October 2, 2026
Advisory Details (4)
Auto-updated Oct 2, 2026commit d16f08a53dd0 (bcgit/bc-csharp)
Fix landed in bcgit/bc-csharp commit d16f08a53dd0 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/bcgit/bc-csharp/commit/d16f08a53dd0a78eb3310bbe80c947c7e1677290commit 65283bae6684 (bcgit/bc-csharp)
Fix landed in bcgit/bc-csharp commit 65283bae6684 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/bcgit/bc-csharp/commit/65283bae66843d0d3c13c5e0272dbbe1c0d6aa04commit 10a9862fad04 (bcgit/bc-csharp)
Fix landed in bcgit/bc-csharp commit 10a9862fad04 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/bcgit/bc-csharp/commit/10a9862fad04bb0c832a78b10e71d9818d6d1a63CVE 2026 63568 · bcgit/bc-csharp Wiki · GitHub
https://github.com/bcgit/bc-csharp/wiki/CVE-2026-63568Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-63568(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 18× in last 7d / 18× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-10-04 09:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-03 20:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-03 20:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-03 07:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-02 18:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 18:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-02 18:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-02 18:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-02 18:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-02 18:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-02 18:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 18:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-02 14:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-02 07:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 07:06 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 07:05 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-63568?
When was CVE-2026-63568 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-63568 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-63568?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-63568?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-63568
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-63568?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.