GitPython before 3.1.51 fails to guard against dangerous Git options passed as keyword arguments in Repo.archive() and git.ls_remote(), allowing command injection via options such as --exec/--upload-pack (leading to arbitrary command execution). Additionally, Repo.iter_commits() and Repo.blame() do not check for leading-dash revision arguments, so a revision like --output= can cause Git to open and truncate an arbitrary file. Exploitation requires an application that passes attacker-controlled arguments to these methods.
CVE-2026-67323
Score 8.4 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-08-01. the CNA's CVSS baseline 8.4; sources differ by 0.0.
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 8.4
- EG Score
- 8.4(high)
- EG Risk
- 54(Track*)EG Risk 54/100SSVC: Track*
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity84% × 45%Exploitation40% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%Action: Watch closely — could escalate to Attend. - EPSS PROB
- 1%
- EPSS %ILE
- 61%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
August 1, 2026
Last Modified
August 14, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Aug 1, 2026GitPython before 3.1.51 Command Injection via unguarded Git options | Advisories | VulnCheck
https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/gitpython-before-command-injection-via-unguarded-git-optionscommand injection via unguarded Git options in `Repo.archive()`, `git.ls_remote()`, and arbitrary file overwrite via `Repo.iter_commits()` / `Repo.blame()` · Advisory · gitpython-developers/GitPython · GitHub
https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython/security/advisories/GHSA-956x-8gvw-wg5vVendor Advisories for CVE-2026-67323(4)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- GHSA-4vpg-pfj8-m33qGitHub Security AdvisoriesHigh
GitPython before 3.1.51 fails to guard against dangerous Git options passed as keyword arguments...
- RHSA-2026:45940Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs bug fix and enhancement update
- RHSA-2026:45785Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs Security Update
- RHSA-2026:44416Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs bug fix and enhancement update
Patch Availability(3)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fixed in / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | llvm21-main-21.1.8-8.hum1 | 2026-07-26 | redhat |
| redhat | swift-lang-main-6.3.3-0.1.1.hum1 | 2026-07-25 | redhat |
| redhat | llvm-main-22.1.8-4.1.hum1 | 2026-07-23 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(5 across 5 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| python-git | 3.1.14-1 ... 3.1.50-1 (14 versions) | — | — |
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| python-git | 3.1.30-1 ... 3.1.50-1 (10 versions) | — | — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| python-git | 3.1.44-1, 3.1.45-1, 3.1.46-1, 3.1.50-1 | — | — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| python-git | 3.1.44-1, 3.1.45-1, 3.1.46-1, 3.1.50-1 | — | — |
PyPI(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| gitpython | 0.1.7 ... 3.1.9 (103 versions) | 3.1.51 | — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 46× in last 7d / 119× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 119 total refreshes for this CVE.
- 2026-08-20 10:14 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-20 10:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-19 22:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-19 22:54 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-19 22:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-19 11:33 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-19 11:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-19 00:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-19 00:11 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-19 00:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-18 12:51 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-18 12:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-18 01:00 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-18 01:00 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-18 01:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-17 13:12 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-17 13:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-17 01:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-17 01:52 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-17 01:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-16 14:32 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-08-16 14:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-16 03:12 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-16 03:12 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-16 03:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-15 15:52 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-15 15:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-15 04:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-15 04:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-15 04:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-14 17:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-14 17:11 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-14 17:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-14 16:20 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-14 16:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-14 05:00 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-14 05:00 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-14 05:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-13 17:40 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-13 17:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-13 06:14 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-13 06:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-12 18:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-12 18:53 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-12 18:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-12 07:33 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-12 07:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-11 20:13 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-11 20:13 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-11 20:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-11 08:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-11 08:53 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-11 08:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-10 21:33 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-10 21:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-10 10:12 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-10 10:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-09 22:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-09 22:52 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-09 22:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-09 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-09 11:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-09 11:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-09 00:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-09 00:11 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-09 00:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-08 12:51 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-08 12:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-08 01:30 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-08 01:30 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-08 01:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-07 14:10 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-07 14:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-07 02:50 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-07 02:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-06 15:30 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-06 15:30 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-06 15:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-06 04:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-06 04:09 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-06 04:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-05 16:50 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-05 16:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-05 05:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-05 05:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-05 04:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-05 04:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-04 19:03 UTCEG score recompute
Related CVEs(same vendor + same CWE)
Same vendor
10 shownredhat
- CVE-2001-0825EG 10.0HIGH
- CVE-2001-1009EG 10.0EPSS p93HIGH
- CVE-2001-0554EG 10.0EPSS p98HIGH
- CVE-2001-1162EG 10.0EPSS p96HIGH
- CVE-2001-0414EG 10.0EPSS p100HIGH
- CVE-2001-0191EG 10.0EPSS p92HIGH
- CVE-2001-0301EG 10.0EPSS p91HIGH
- CVE-2001-0197EG 10.0EPSS p96HIGH
- CVE-2001-0233EG 10.0EPSS p96HIGH
- CVE-2001-0010EG 10.0EPSS p98HIGH
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-77
- CVE-2015-7541EG 10.0CRITICAL
- CVE-2015-1815EG 10.0EPSS p97HIGH
- CVE-2014-1905EG 10.0EPSS p95HIGH
- CVE-2013-2810EG 10.0EPSS p93HIGH
- CVE-2014-5470EG 9.8EPSS p95CRITICAL
- CVE-2013-2513EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2015-20108EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2015-10096NVD 5.0EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2015-20107NVD 7.6EG 9.8EPSS p94CRITICAL
- CVE-2014-4982EG 9.8EPSS p91CRITICAL
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-67323?
When was CVE-2026-67323 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-67323 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-67323?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-67323?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-67323
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-67323?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.