CVE-2026-64456

HIGHPre-NVD 7.77.7
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 7.7 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-07-25. a secondary CVSS source baseline 7.7; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
7.7EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 7.7Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

hwrng: virtio: clamp device-reported used.len at copy_data()

random_recv_done() stores the device-reported used.len directly into vi->data_avail. copy_data() then indexes vi->data[] using vi->data_idx (advanced by previous copy_data() calls) and issues a memcpy() without re-validating either value against the posted buffer size sizeof(vi->data) (SMP_CACHE_BYTES bytes, typically 32 or 64).

A malicious or buggy virtio-rng backend can set used.len beyond sizeof(vi->data), steering the memcpy() past the end of the inline array into adjacent kmalloc-1k slab bytes. hwrng_fillfn() mixes those bytes into the guest RNG, and guest root can also observe them directly via /dev/hwrng.

Concrete impact is inside the guest:

  • Memory-safety / hardening: any virtio-rng backend that
over-reports used.len causes the driver to read past vi->data into unrelated slab contents. hwrng_fillfn() is a kernel thread that runs as soon as the device is probed; no guest userspace interaction is required to first-trigger the OOB.
  • Cross-boundary leak (confidential-compute threat model): a
malicious hypervisor cooperating with a malicious or compromised guest root userspace can use /dev/hwrng as a leak channel for guest-kernel heap data. The host sets a large used.len, guest root reads /dev/hwrng, and the returned bytes contain guest kernel slab contents that were adjacent to vi->data. In practice, confidential-compute guests (SEV-SNP, TDX) usually disable virtio-rng entirely, so this path is narrow, but the fix is still worth carrying because the underlying memory-safety bug contaminates the guest RNG on any host.

KASAN confirms the OOB on a 7.1-rc4 guest whose virtio-rng backend has been patched to report used.len = 0x10000:

BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in virtio_read+0x394/0x5d0 Read of size 64 at addr ffff88800ae0ba20 by task hwrng/52 Call Trace: __asan_memcpy+0x23/0x60 virtio_read+0x394/0x5d0 hwrng_fillfn+0xb2/0x470 kthread+0x2cc/0x3a0 Allocated by task 1: probe_common+0xa5/0x660 virtio_dev_probe+0x549/0xbc0 The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff88800ae0b800 which belongs to the cache kmalloc-1k of size 1024 The buggy address is located 0 bytes to the right of allocated 544-byte region [ffff88800ae0b800, ffff88800ae0ba20)

Same class of bug as commit c04db81cd028 ("net/9p: Fix buffer overflow in USB transport layer"), which hardened usb9pfs_rx_complete() against unchecked device-reported length in the USB 9p transport.

With the clamp at point of use and array_index_nospec() in place, the same harness boots cleanly: copy_data() returns zero for the bogus report, the device-supplied bytes after data_idx are discarded, and the driver issues a fresh request.

CVSS v3
7.7
EG Score
7.7(medium)
EG Risk
39(Track)
EG Risk 39/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity77% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
4%
KEV
Not listed

Published

July 25, 2026

Last Modified

August 17, 2026

Advisory Details (8)

Auto-updated Jul 27, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

hwrng: virtio: clamp device-reported used.len at copy_data() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fde19b0d4eeabae042519313c843fe6f27d41e9d
generic

hwrng: virtio: clamp device-reported used.len at copy_data() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e3046eeada299f917a8ad883af4434bfb86556b1
generic

hwrng: virtio: clamp device-reported used.len at copy_data() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/92d5736a62040ec1cfff23ea57e6599301690ad5
generic

hwrng: virtio: clamp device-reported used.len at copy_data() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/81dd21b5f0c299cc7b5bf84f04a61938559d20e6
generic

hwrng: virtio: clamp device-reported used.len at copy_data() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/63335e7b638ae70028ae285bb95153874a8bc852
generic

hwrng: virtio: clamp device-reported used.len at copy_data() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3aa3e89cf80721c8d382b4c1a2b70a0449dad4a5
generic

hwrng: virtio: clamp device-reported used.len at copy_data() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2e788948ff2a13358a303af112497a63201c5739
generic

hwrng: virtio: clamp device-reported used.len at copy_data() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/285e17c44e3873a73460f294acbd64018ff64385

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-64456(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(3)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-26.04-edge (7.0.0-31.31) @ resolute2026-09-15ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oem-7.0 (7.0.0-1013.13) @ resolute2026-09-15ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gcp-edge (7.0.0-1011.11~24.04.1) @ noble2026-09-15ubuntu

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(6 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 5.10.92-2 (55 versions)5.10.262-1
linux-6.16.1.106-3~deb11u1 ... 6.1.177-1~deb11u1 (22 versions)6.1.180-1~deb11u1
Debian:12(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (55 versions)6.1.180-1
linux-6.126.12.100-1~deb12u1
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.95-1~bpo12+1 (30 versions)6.12.96-1
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.1~rc7-1~exp1 (158 versions)7.1.4-1

Additional Vendor Advisories

(3)

Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 29× in last 7d / 131× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 241 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-09-15 09:20 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-09-15 09:20 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-09-15 09:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-09-14 15:54 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-09-14 15:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-09-14 04:06 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-09-14 04:06 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-09-14 04:06 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-09-13 16:19 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-09-13 16:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-09-13 04:32 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-09-13 04:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-09-12 16:44 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-09-12 16:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-09-12 04:56 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-09-12 04:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-09-11 16:20 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-09-11 16:20 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-09-11 16:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-09-11 09:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-09-10 22:15 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-09-10 22:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-09-10 10:27 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-09-10 10:27 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-09-10 10:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-09-09 08:31 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-09-09 08:31 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-09-09 08:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-09-07 21:12 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-09-07 21:12 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-09-07 21:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-09-07 00:01 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-09-07 00:01 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-09-07 00:01 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-09-06 07:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-09-05 19:18 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-09-05 19:18 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-09-05 19:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-09-05 15:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-09-05 05:57 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-09-05 05:57 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-09-05 05:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-09-04 12:38 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-09-04 12:38 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-09-04 12:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-09-04 05:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-09-01 23:08 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-09-01 23:08 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-09-01 23:08 UTCGHSA enrichment
  30. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-08-30 23:46 UTCEG score recompute
  33. 2026-08-30 23:46 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-08-30 23:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
  35. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-08-30 11:59 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-08-30 11:59 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-08-30 11:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  39. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-08-30 00:03 UTCEG score recompute
  41. 2026-08-30 00:03 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-08-30 00:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
  43. 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-08-27 21:43 UTCEG score recompute
  45. 2026-08-27 21:43 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-08-27 21:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  47. 2026-08-27 09:56 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-08-27 09:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  49. 2026-08-26 19:48 UTCEG score recompute
  50. 2026-08-26 19:48 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-08-26 19:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  52. 2026-08-26 14:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-08-26 05:37 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-08-26 05:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
  55. 2026-08-25 17:42 UTCEG score recompute
  56. 2026-08-25 17:42 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-08-25 17:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  58. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-08-25 05:49 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-08-25 05:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  61. 2026-08-24 18:02 UTCEG score recompute
  62. 2026-08-24 18:02 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-08-24 18:02 UTCGHSA enrichment
  64. 2026-08-24 06:14 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-08-24 06:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  66. 2026-08-23 18:18 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-08-23 18:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  68. 2026-08-23 06:32 UTCEG score recompute
  69. 2026-08-23 06:32 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-08-23 06:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
  71. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-08-22 18:44 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-08-22 18:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  74. 2026-08-22 06:57 UTCEG score recompute
  75. 2026-08-22 06:57 UTCVendor advisory

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-64456?
CVE-2026-64456 is a high vulnerability published on July 25, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: hwrng: virtio: clamp device-reported used.len at copy_data() randomrecvdone() stores the device-reported used.len directly into vi->dataavail. copydata() then indexes vi->data[] using vi->dataidx (advanced by previous copydata()…
When was CVE-2026-64456 disclosed?
CVE-2026-64456 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on July 25, 2026, with the most recent update on August 17, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-64456 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-64456 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 95.6% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-64456?
CVE-2026-64456 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.7 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-64456?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-64456, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-64456

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-64456?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.