CVE-2026-64448

HIGHPre-NVD 8.28.2
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 8.2 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-07-25. a secondary CVSS source baseline 8.2; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
8.2EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 8.2Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

smb: client: restrict implied bcc[0] exemption to responses without data area

smb2_check_message() has a long-standing quirk that accepts a response whose calculated length is one byte larger than the bytes actually received ("server can return one byte more due to implied bcc[0]"). This was introduced to accommodate servers that omit the trailing bcc[0] overlap byte when no data area is present.

However, the exemption is applied unconditionally, regardless of whether the command actually carries a data area (has_smb2_data_area[]). When a response with a data area is subject to the +1 exemption, the reported data can extend one byte beyond the bytes actually received, yet smb2_check_message() still accepts it. The subsequent decoder then reads past the end of the receive buffer. This is reachable during NEGOTIATE and SESSION_SETUP, before the session is established.

The resulting out-of-bounds reads are visible under KASAN when mounting against a non-conforming server; both the SPNEGO/negTokenInit and the NTLMSSP challenge decoders are affected:

BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in asn1_ber_decoder+0x16a7/0x1b00 Read of size 1 at addr ffff8880084d67c0 by task mount.cifs/81 CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 81 Comm: mount.cifs Not tainted 7.1.0-rc6 #1 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x4e/0x70 print_report+0x157/0x4c9 kasan_report+0xce/0x100 asn1_ber_decoder+0x16a7/0x1b00 decode_negTokenInit+0x19/0x30 SMB2_negotiate+0x31d9/0x4c90 cifs_negotiate_protocol+0x1f2/0x3f0 cifs_get_smb_ses+0x93f/0x17e0 cifs_mount_get_session+0x7f/0x3a0 cifs_mount+0xb4/0xcf0 cifs_smb3_do_mount+0x23a/0x1500 smb3_get_tree+0x3b0/0x630 vfs_get_tree+0x82/0x2d0 fc_mount+0x10/0x1b0 path_mount+0x50d/0x1de0 __x64_sys_mount+0x20b/0x270 do_syscall_64+0xee/0x590 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f Allocated by task 85: kmem_cache_alloc_noprof+0x106/0x380 mempool_alloc_noprof+0x116/0x1e0 cifs_small_buf_get+0x31/0x80 allocate_buffers+0x10d/0x2b0 cifs_demultiplex_thread+0x1d5/0x1d50 kthread+0x2c6/0x390 ret_from_fork+0x36e/0x5a0 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 The buggy address is located 0 bytes to the right of allocated 448-byte region [ffff8880084d6600, ffff8880084d67c0) which belongs to the cache cifs_small_rq of size 448

BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in kmemdup_noprof+0x36/0x50 Read of size 329 at addr ffff88800726c678 by task mount.cifs/89 CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 89 Comm: mount.cifs Tainted: G B 7.1.0-rc6 #1 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x4e/0x70 print_report+0x157/0x4c9 kasan_report+0xce/0x100 kasan_check_range+0x10f/0x1e0 __asan_memcpy+0x23/0x60 kmemdup_noprof+0x36/0x50 decode_ntlmssp_challenge+0x457/0x680 SMB2_sess_auth_rawntlmssp_negotiate+0x6f0/0xcb0 SMB2_sess_setup+0x219/0x4f0 cifs_setup_session+0x248/0xaf0 cifs_get_smb_ses+0xf79/0x17e0 cifs_mount_get_session+0x7f/0x3a0 cifs_mount+0xb4/0xcf0 cifs_smb3_do_mount+0x23a/0x1500 smb3_get_tree+0x3b0/0x630 vfs_get_tree+0x82/0x2d0 fc_mount+0x10/0x1b0 path_mount+0x50d/0x1de0 __x64_sys_mount+0x20b/0x270 do_syscall_64+0xee/0x590 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f Allocated by task 93: kmem_cache_alloc_noprof+0x106/0x380 mempool_alloc_noprof+0x116/0x1e0 cifs_small_buf_get+0x31/0x80 allocate_buffers+0x10d/0x2b0 cifs_demultiplex_thread+0x1d5/0x1d50 kthread+0x2c6/0x390 ret_from_fork+0x36e/0x5a0 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 The buggy address is located 120 bytes inside of allocated 448-byte region [ffff88800726c600, ffff88800726c7c0) which belongs to the cache cifs_small_rq of size 448

Restrict the +1 exemption to responses that have no data area, so that it still covers the bcc[0] omission it was meant for. When a data area is present, the +1 discrepancy instead means the reported data length overruns the ---truncated---

CVSS v3
8.2
EG Score
8.2(medium)
EG Risk
42(Track)
EG Risk 42/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity82% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
39%
KEV
Not listed

Published

July 25, 2026

Last Modified

September 3, 2026

Advisory Details (8)

Auto-updated Jul 27, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

smb: client: restrict implied bcc[0] exemption to responses without data area - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ceb875a375dedbf51c9425c1d13a2d7a8435c08c
generic

smb: client: restrict implied bcc[0] exemption to responses without data area - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b6a381c01e2ac98a48e32ac0f2a45bbadd9e26b0
generic

smb: client: restrict implied bcc[0] exemption to responses without data area - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8d0bbc78046d264bbf6a574ea6f9072258a43e35
generic

smb: client: restrict implied bcc[0] exemption to responses without data area - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6e9d10f62773b99bd927940fd9cbdfe7207e23ff
generic

smb: client: restrict implied bcc[0] exemption to responses without data area - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/573e502d14714d2947e22e7eff40ec20a6a44a42
generic

smb: client: restrict implied bcc[0] exemption to responses without data area - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/53b7c271f06be4dd5cfc8c6ef552a8355c891a7f
generic

smb: client: restrict implied bcc[0] exemption to responses without data area - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/419ec1b604d7fb60c10aec2dc062371f9fcd4940
generic

smb: client: restrict implied bcc[0] exemption to responses without data area - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/31c6312608c60b72a1feb99a5afb680645a3e8a3

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-64448(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(3)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntulinux-tools-gcp-edge (7.0.0-1011.11~24.04.1) @ noble2026-09-15ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-26.04-edge (7.0.0-31.31) @ resolute2026-09-15ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oem-7.0 (7.0.0-1013.13) @ resolute2026-09-15ubuntu

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(6 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 5.10.92-2 (55 versions)5.10.262-1
linux-6.16.1.106-3~deb11u1 ... 6.1.177-1~deb11u1 (22 versions)6.1.180-1~deb11u1
Debian:12(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (55 versions)6.1.180-1
linux-6.126.12.100-1~deb12u1
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.95-1~bpo12+1 (30 versions)6.12.96-1
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.1~rc7-1~exp1 (158 versions)7.1.4-1

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(3)

Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 28× in last 7d / 134× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 243 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-09-15 09:20 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-09-15 09:20 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-09-15 09:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-09-14 10:43 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-09-14 10:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-09-13 21:23 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-09-13 21:23 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-09-13 21:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-09-13 07:49 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-09-13 07:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-09-12 18:40 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-09-12 18:40 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-09-12 18:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-09-12 05:30 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-09-12 05:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-09-11 16:20 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-09-11 16:20 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-09-11 16:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-09-11 09:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-09-11 02:09 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-09-11 02:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-09-10 10:28 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-09-10 10:28 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-09-10 10:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-09-09 08:31 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-09-09 08:31 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-09-09 08:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-09-07 21:12 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-09-07 21:12 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-09-07 21:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-09-07 00:02 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-09-07 00:02 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-09-07 00:01 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-09-06 08:27 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-09-06 08:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-09-05 19:18 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-09-05 19:18 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-09-05 19:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-09-05 15:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-09-05 05:57 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-09-05 05:57 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-09-05 05:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-09-04 12:38 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-09-04 12:38 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-09-04 12:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-09-04 05:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-09-03 15:53 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-09-03 15:53 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-09-03 15:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  29. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-09-01 23:09 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-09-01 23:09 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-09-01 23:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
  33. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-08-31 02:22 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-08-31 02:22 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-08-31 02:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  38. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-08-30 13:12 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-08-30 13:12 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-08-30 13:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  42. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-08-30 00:03 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-08-30 00:03 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-08-30 00:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
  46. 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-08-27 21:04 UTCEG score recompute
  48. 2026-08-27 21:04 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-08-27 21:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
  50. 2026-08-27 04:44 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-08-27 04:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  52. 2026-08-26 15:30 UTCEG score recompute
  53. 2026-08-26 15:30 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-08-26 15:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  55. 2026-08-26 14:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-08-26 02:09 UTCEG score recompute
  57. 2026-08-26 02:09 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-08-26 02:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
  59. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-08-25 12:56 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-08-25 12:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  62. 2026-08-24 23:41 UTCEG score recompute
  63. 2026-08-24 23:41 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-08-24 23:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  65. 2026-08-24 10:32 UTCEG score recompute
  66. 2026-08-24 10:32 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-08-24 10:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
  68. 2026-08-23 21:23 UTCVendor advisory
  69. 2026-08-23 21:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  70. 2026-08-23 08:14 UTCEG score recompute
  71. 2026-08-23 08:14 UTCVendor advisory
  72. 2026-08-23 08:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  73. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-08-22 19:05 UTCVendor advisory
  75. 2026-08-22 19:05 UTCGHSA enrichment

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-64448?
CVE-2026-64448 is a high vulnerability published on July 25, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: smb: client: restrict implied bcc[0] exemption to responses without data area smb2checkmessage() has a long-standing quirk that accepts a response whose calculated length is one byte larger than the bytes actually received ("server…
When was CVE-2026-64448 disclosed?
CVE-2026-64448 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on July 25, 2026, with the most recent update on September 3, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-64448 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-64448 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 61.1% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-64448?
CVE-2026-64448 has a CVSS v3 base score of 8.2 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-64448?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-64448, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-64448

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-64448?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.