CVE-2026-64115

HIGHPre-NVD 8.88.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 8.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-07-19. a secondary CVSS source baseline 8.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
8.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 8.8Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

vsock/vmci: fix UAF when peer resets connection during handshake

vmci_transport_recv_connecting_server() returned err = 0 for a peer RST in its default switch arm:

err = pkt->type == VMCI_TRANSPORT_PACKET_TYPE_RST ? 0 : -EINVAL;

That made vmci_transport_recv_listen() skip vsock_remove_pending(), leaving the pending socket on the listener's pending_links with sk_state = TCP_CLOSE while destroy: still dropped the explicit reference taken before schedule_delayed_work().

One second later vsock_pending_work() observed is_pending=true and performed full cleanup: vsock_remove_pending() then the two trailing sock_put(sk) calls -- the first reached refcount 0 and __sk_freed the socket, and the second wrote into the freed object:

BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in refcount_warn_saturate Write of size 4 at addr ffff88800b1cac80 by task kworker Workqueue: events vsock_pending_work

Treat peer RST like any other unexpected packet type (err = -EINVAL). All destroy: arms now return err < 0, so vmci_transport_recv_listen() removes pending from pending_links synchronously and vsock_pending_work() takes the is_pending=false / !rejected branch, dropping only its own work reference. This also closes the multi-packet race Sashiko reported on v2: pending is removed from the list before any subsequent packet can find it.

The pre-existing sk_acceptq_removed() gap on the err < 0 path of vmci_transport_recv_listen() that Sashiko also noted is not introduced or changed by this patch.

Tested on lts-6.12.79 with KASAN: 52/100 unpatched -> 0/100 patched.

CVSS v3
8.8
EG Score
8.8(medium)
EG Risk
44(Track)
EG Risk 44/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity88% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
3%
KEV
Not listed

Published

July 19, 2026

Last Modified

August 12, 2026

Advisory Details (8)

Auto-updated Jul 20, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

vsock/vmci: fix UAF when peer resets connection during handshake - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ecda37f8faab3220da199335e42564cb7a9ad145
generic

vsock/vmci: fix UAF when peer resets connection during handshake - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cc27e989a5dfdfcfc1cca7c3be27a0c7532b46cb
generic

vsock/vmci: fix UAF when peer resets connection during handshake - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9fe74e42914c851d68069713b7b917a9c33faf26
generic

vsock/vmci: fix UAF when peer resets connection during handshake - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/99e22ddf4edb63dc8382bc028af928056d3450cf
generic

vsock/vmci: fix UAF when peer resets connection during handshake - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/47e63077605c6c2aa45b3df9847a8cdc1f1f6ef9
generic

vsock/vmci: fix UAF when peer resets connection during handshake - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/440447699c681e26ed58e9c309cad718270a18b4
generic

vsock/vmci: fix UAF when peer resets connection during handshake - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1e19f08552b90070ed18bafb1763c78297823af6
generic

vsock/vmci: fix UAF when peer resets connection during handshake - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1dd531e28f61edd286edc486ab068f135b5ae1eb

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-64115(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(16)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 5.10.92-2 (54 versions)5.10.259-1
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (53 versions)6.1.176-1
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.94-1~bpo12+1 (27 versions)6.12.94-1
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.0.9-1~bpo13+1 (138 versions)7.0.12-1

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

All Vendor Advisories

(16)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 32× in last 7d / 167× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 220 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-08-30 02:46 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-08-30 02:46 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-08-30 02:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-27 23:47 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-08-27 23:47 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-08-27 23:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-08-27 11:48 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-08-27 11:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-08-26 23:34 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-08-26 23:34 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-08-26 23:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-08-26 11:42 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-08-26 11:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-08-25 22:44 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-08-25 22:44 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-08-25 22:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-25 09:35 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-08-25 09:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-08-24 21:42 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-08-24 21:42 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-08-24 21:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-24 09:51 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-08-24 09:51 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-08-24 09:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-08-23 21:59 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-08-23 21:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-08-23 10:08 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-08-23 10:08 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-08-22 22:15 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-08-22 22:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-08-22 10:23 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-08-22 10:23 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-08-22 10:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-08-21 22:31 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-08-21 22:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-08-21 10:40 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-08-21 10:40 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-08-21 10:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-08-20 22:42 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-08-20 22:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-08-20 10:50 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-08-20 10:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-08-19 22:58 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-08-19 22:58 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-08-19 22:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  27. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-08-19 07:39 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-08-19 07:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  30. 2026-08-18 19:44 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-08-18 19:44 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-08-18 19:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  33. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-08-18 02:27 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-08-18 02:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  36. 2026-08-17 14:33 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-08-17 14:33 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-08-17 14:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
  39. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-08-17 02:41 UTCEG score recompute
  41. 2026-08-17 02:41 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-08-17 02:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  43. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-08-16 14:49 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-08-16 14:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  46. 2026-08-16 02:57 UTCEG score recompute
  47. 2026-08-16 02:57 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-08-16 02:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  49. 2026-08-15 15:06 UTCVendor advisory
  50. 2026-08-15 15:06 UTCGHSA enrichment
  51. 2026-08-15 03:14 UTCEG score recompute
  52. 2026-08-15 03:14 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-08-15 03:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  54. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-08-14 15:22 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-08-14 15:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  57. 2026-08-14 03:31 UTCEG score recompute
  58. 2026-08-14 03:31 UTCVendor advisory
  59. 2026-08-14 03:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  60. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-08-13 15:39 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-08-13 15:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  63. 2026-08-13 03:43 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-08-13 03:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  65. 2026-08-12 15:51 UTCEG score recompute
  66. 2026-08-12 15:51 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-08-12 15:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  68. 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-08-12 11:21 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-08-12 11:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  71. 2026-08-11 23:29 UTCEG score recompute
  72. 2026-08-11 23:29 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-08-11 23:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  74. 2026-08-11 11:37 UTCEG score recompute
  75. 2026-08-11 11:37 UTCVendor advisory

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-64115?
CVE-2026-64115 is a high vulnerability published on July 19, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: vsock/vmci: fix UAF when peer resets connection during handshake vmcitransportrecvconnectingserver() returned err = 0 for a peer RST in its default switch arm: err = pkt->type == VMCITRANSPORTPACKETTYPERST ? 0 : -EINVAL; That made…
When was CVE-2026-64115 disclosed?
CVE-2026-64115 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on July 19, 2026, with the most recent update on August 12, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-64115 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-64115 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 96.7% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-64115?
CVE-2026-64115 has a CVSS v3 base score of 8.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-64115?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-64115, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-64115

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-64115?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.