CVE-2026-64017

HIGHPre-NVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-07-19. A secondary CVSS source baseline 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.1%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

blk-mq: pop cached request if it is usable

When submitting a bio to blk-mq, if the task should sleep after peeking a cached request, but before it pops it, the plug flushes and calls blk_mq_free_plug_rqs, freeing the cached_rqs. This creates a use-after-free bug. Fix this by popping the cached request before any possible blocking calls if it is suitable for use.

Popping this request first holds a queue reference, so avoid any serialization races with queue freezes and can safely proceed with dispatching that request to the driver. This potentially increases a timing window from when a driver wants to freeze its queue to when requests stop being dispatched. That scenario is off the fast path though, and drivers need to appropriately handle requests during a freeze request anyway.

The downside is the popped element needs to be individually freed when we performed a bio plug merge. The cached request would have had to be freed later anyway, but this patch does it inline with building the plug list instead of after flushing it.

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
35
EG Risk 35/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity78% × 45%
The EG Score, 7.8 of 10.
Exploitation0.1% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.1%
EPSS %ILE
1st
KEV
Not listed

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

July 19, 2026

Last Modified

October 13, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Jul 21, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

blk-mq: pop cached request if it is usable - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/dc278e9bf2b9513a763353e6b9cc21e0f532954e
Web page

blk-mq: pop cached request if it is usable - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/388468f7e7d1eab092cf2a39fdfb502e52019ec6

Patch Availability(13)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (358 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
linux-6.126.12.100-1~deb12u1, 6.12.101-1~deb12u1
  • every version up to 6.12.107-1~deb12u1: fixed in 6.12.107-1~deb12u1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.12.96-1 (33 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.105-1: fixed in 6.12.105-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.0.9-1~bpo13+1 (142 versions)
  • every version up to 7.0.12-1: fixed in 7.0.12-1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(10)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 16× in last 7d / 50× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 310 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 210 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  2. 2026-10-13 15:07 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-10-13 15:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pqjq-mhgh-j532 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  4. 2026-10-13 11:47 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-13 11:47 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-10-13 11:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pqjq-mhgh-j532 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  7. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  8. 2026-10-12 15:48 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-11 19:33 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-11 16:48 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-11 14:09 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  13. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  14. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  15. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  16. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  17. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  18. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  19. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  20. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  21. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  22. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  23. 2026-10-01 08:46 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-01 08:46 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-10-01 08:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pqjq-mhgh-j532 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  2. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  3. 2026-09-28 07:24 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-09-28 07:24 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-09-28 07:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pqjq-mhgh-j532 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  6. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  7. 2026-09-24 03:39 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-09-24 03:39 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-09-24 03:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pqjq-mhgh-j532 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  10. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  11. 2026-09-23 02:02 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-09-23 02:02 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-09-23 02:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pqjq-mhgh-j532 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  14. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  15. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  16. 2026-09-18 04:19 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-09-18 04:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pqjq-mhgh-j532 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  18. 2026-09-17 05:29 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-09-17 05:29 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-09-17 05:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pqjq-mhgh-j532 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  21. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  22. 2026-09-16 12:59 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-09-16 12:59 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-09-16 12:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pqjq-mhgh-j532 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  25. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  26. 2026-09-14 10:51 UTCVendor advisory
  27. 2026-09-14 10:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pqjq-mhgh-j532 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  28. 2026-09-13 22:58 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-09-13 22:58 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-09-13 22:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pqjq-mhgh-j532 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  31. 2026-09-13 07:14 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-09-13 07:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pqjq-mhgh-j532 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  33. 2026-09-12 19:41 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-09-12 19:41 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-09-12 19:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pqjq-mhgh-j532 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  36. 2026-09-12 07:16 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-09-12 07:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pqjq-mhgh-j532 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  38. 2026-09-11 18:47 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-09-11 18:47 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-09-11 18:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pqjq-mhgh-j532 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  41. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  42. 2026-09-11 09:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  43. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  44. 2026-09-07 23:19 UTCEG score recompute
  45. 2026-09-07 23:19 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-09-07 23:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pqjq-mhgh-j532 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  47. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  48. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  49. 2026-09-06 12:57 UTCVendor advisory
  50. 2026-09-06 12:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pqjq-mhgh-j532 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  51. 2026-09-05 21:31 UTCEG score recompute
  52. 2026-09-05 21:31 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-09-05 21:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pqjq-mhgh-j532 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  54. 2026-09-05 15:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  55. 2026-09-05 09:57 UTCEG score recompute
  56. 2026-09-05 09:57 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-09-05 09:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pqjq-mhgh-j532 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  58. 2026-09-04 05:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  59. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  60. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  61. 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  62. 2026-08-31 03:18 UTCEG score recompute
  63. 2026-08-31 03:18 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-08-31 03:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pqjq-mhgh-j532 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  65. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  66. 2026-08-30 15:37 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-08-30 15:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pqjq-mhgh-j532 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  68. 2026-08-30 02:52 UTCEG score recompute
  69. 2026-08-30 02:52 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-08-30 02:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pqjq-mhgh-j532 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  71. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  72. 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  73. 2026-08-28 01:43 UTCEG score recompute
  74. 2026-08-28 01:43 UTCVendor advisory
  75. 2026-08-28 01:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pqjq-mhgh-j532 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-64017?
CVE-2026-64017 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on July 19, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: blk-mq: pop cached request if it is usable When submitting a bio to blk-mq, if the task should sleep after peeking a cached request, but before it pops it, the plug flushes and calls blkmqfreeplugrqs, freeing the cached_rqs. This…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-64017 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-64017 was published on July 19, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 13, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-64017 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-64017 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (1st percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-64017?
CVE-2026-64017 has a CVSS base score of 7.8 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-64017?
A fix for CVE-2026-64017 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-64017 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-64017

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-64017?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.