CVE-2026-63076

HIGHPre-NVD 7.57.5
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

Score 7.5 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-08-25. CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1 baseline 7.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: cisa-adp, epss, ghsa
Trending — Patch released this week
7.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 1%CVSS: 7.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

Issue summary: OpenSSL CMP password based protection verification only checks whether the protectionAlg parameter was not NULL and not its ASN.1 type, before treating it as a PBMParameter. A crafted message can contain a parameter of a different type, which is then dereferenced as an invalid pointer.

Impact summary: A remote, unauthenticated attacker can crash an application acting as a CMP server that accepts PBM-protected messages, or a CMP client talking to a malicious or intercepted CMP server, resulting in a Denial of Service.

CWE: CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference

Description: When verifying the password-based MAC protection of a CMP message, OpenSSL library reads the protectionAlg algorithm parameter with X509_ALGOR_get0(), which returns both the parameter type and its value pointer. The value is then cast to an ASN1_STRING and treated as the expected PBMParameter after only checking that pointer is not NULL. The parameter type returned by X509_ALGOR_get0() was never consulted.

This happens during protection verification, before any MAC is computed, so no knowledge of the PBM shared secret is required; the only precondition is that PBM verification is reachable. On the server side this is reached from OSSL_CMP_SRV_process_request() for any application that stands up a CMP server accepting PBM-protected messages, and on the client side from CMP response validation against a malicious or on-path (MITM) server. The reliable consequence is a denial of service; there is no memory disclosure, no controlled memory write, and no path to code execution. CMP is a specialized feature that an application must explicitly enable.

FIPS impact: no As the CMP code lives outside the FIPS module boundary, no FIPS modules are affected by this CVE.

CVSS v3
7.5
EG Score
7.5(high)
EG Risk
49(Track)
EG Risk 49/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity75% × 45%
Exploitation1% × 40%
Automatability100% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
1%
EPSS %ILE
69%
KEV
Not listed

Published

August 25, 2026

Last Modified

August 28, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Aug 25, 2026
Upstream fix merged — awaiting tagged release. Sources: github_commit.
github_commit

commit 37882aa2e025 (openssl/openssl)

Fix landed in openssl/openssl commit 37882aa2e025 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/37882aa2e0256e1072442a8f62f7db45b995c45b
github_commit

commit a1f348ccb328 (openssl/openssl)

Fix landed in openssl/openssl commit a1f348ccb328 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/a1f348ccb328c3afbd4ba6883f9b7c813c043259
github_commit

commit a17cc8d612ec (openssl/openssl)

Fix landed in openssl/openssl commit a17cc8d612ec — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/a17cc8d612ecff6d94a9b7ca8b5283ddf5ff570e

Patch Availability(3)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntuopenssl-provider-legacy (3.5.5-1ubuntu3.4) @ resolute2026-08-30ubuntu
redhatopenssl3-main-3.5.8-0.1.hum12026-08-25redhat
redhatopenssl-main-3.5.8-0.1.hum12026-08-25redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(1)

Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 34× in last 7d / 34× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-08-30 05:36 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-08-30 05:36 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-08-30 05:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-29 18:24 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-08-29 18:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-08-29 07:11 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-08-29 07:11 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-08-29 07:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-08-28 19:58 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-08-28 19:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-08-28 10:30 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-08-28 10:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-08-27 23:17 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-08-27 23:17 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-08-27 23:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-08-27 12:06 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-08-27 12:06 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-08-27 00:55 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-08-27 00:55 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-08-27 00:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-08-26 13:44 UTCVendor advisory
Show 9 more
  1. 2026-08-26 13:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-08-26 02:32 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-08-26 02:32 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-08-26 02:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-08-25 14:56 UTCEG score recompute 7.50
  6. 2026-08-25 14:54 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 7.5 · severity → HIGH
  7. 2026-08-25 13:21 UTCNVD update
  8. 2026-08-25 13:16 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-08-25 13:15 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-63076?
CVE-2026-63076 is a high vulnerability published on August 25, 2026. Issue summary: OpenSSL CMP password based protection verification only checks whether the protectionAlg parameter was not NULL and not its ASN.1 type, before treating it as a PBMParameter. A crafted message can contain a parameter of a different type, which is then dereferenced as an invalid…
When was CVE-2026-63076 disclosed?
CVE-2026-63076 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on August 25, 2026, with the most recent update on August 28, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-63076 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-63076 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 31.4% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-63076?
CVE-2026-63076 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.5 (CISA-ADP / Vulnrichment enrichment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-63076?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-63076, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-63076

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-63076?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.