FreeRDP is a free implementation of the Remote Desktop Protocol. From 3.21.0 before 3.28.0, FreeRDP clients using the GFX pipeline contain an incomplete fix for CVE-2026-23530 in planar_decompress_plane_rle_only in libfreerdp/codec/planar.c, allowing a malicious RDP server to send a truncated RDPGFX_CMDID_WIRETOSURFACE_1 planar payload that reads one byte past the input buffer. This issue is fixed in version 3.28.0.
CVE-2026-57158
“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.
This critical-severity CVE scores 9.1 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 0.7% (51st percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
- CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 9.1
- EG Score
- 9.1CRITICALmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 72EG Risk 72/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity91% × 45%The EG Score, 9.1 of 10.Exploitation40% × 40%EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 0.7%
- EPSS %ILE
- 51st
- KEV
- Not listed
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
July 10, 2026
Last Modified
July 14, 2026
Advisory Details (4)
Auto-updated Sep 16, 2026planar_decompress_plane_rle_only: heap OOB read — incomplete fix for CVE-2026-23530 · Advisory · FreeRDP/FreeRDP · GitHub
https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/security/advisories/GHSA-mp3f-59pg-c5pp3.28.0
Patch available: FreeRDP/FreeRDP 3.28.0
https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/releases/tag/3.28.0[codec,planar] fix range check, abort early
Fix merged in FreeRDP/FreeRDP PR #12952 on 2026-06-23 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/pull/12952commit a7e797626fcb (FreeRDP/FreeRDP)
Fix landed in FreeRDP/FreeRDP commit a7e797626fcb — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/commit/a7e797626fcb7f1d556ce63febb84f9f4a822731Patch Availability(1)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| ubuntu | winpr3-utils (3.30.0+dfsg-0ubuntu0.26.04.1) @ resolute | 2026-10-01 | ubuntu |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| freerdp2 | 2.10.0+dfsg1-1 ... 2.9.0+dfsg1-1~bpo11+1 (32 versions) |
| — |
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| freerdp2 | 2.10.0+dfsg1-1 ... 2.11.7+dfsg1-6~deb12u1 (13 versions) |
| — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| freerdp3 | 3.15.0+dfsg-2.1 ... 3.32.1+dfsg-1~bpo13+1 (49 versions) |
| — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| freerdp3 | 3.15.0+dfsg-2.1 ... 3.27.1+dfsg-1 (35 versions) |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
All Vendor Advisories
(1)
Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 13× in last 7d / 45× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 330 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 230 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-14 01:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-10-12 22:10 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-10-12 15:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 19:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 16:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 14:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-10-01 14:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-01 14:58 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-09-29 15:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-09-28 13:34 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-28 09:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 09:46 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-09-24 11:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-24 11:09 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
- 2026-09-23 09:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-23 05:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-23 05:44 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
- 2026-09-18 10:08 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-18 05:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 05:17 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-17 19:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-09-15 03:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-09-14 11:09 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-14 07:15 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-14 03:26 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-13 23:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-13 23:39 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-09-13 16:41 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-13 11:59 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-13 08:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-13 08:11 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-12 13:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-12 02:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-12 02:50 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-09-08 02:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-08 02:46 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:57 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-06 13:57 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-09-06 01:46 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-05 21:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-05 21:41 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-04 05:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-08-31 00:09 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-30 20:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-30 20:21 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-08-30 16:34 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-30 11:11 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-30 06:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-30 06:15 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
- 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
- 2026-08-28 02:38 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-27 21:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-27 21:40 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
- 2026-08-27 00:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-27 00:46 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
- 2026-08-26 12:53 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-26 08:16 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-26 03:33 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-25 15:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-25 15:52 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
- 2026-08-25 11:35 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-25 07:40 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-25 03:48 UTCVendor advisory
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownDebian:13:freerdp3
Same vendor
10 shownubuntu:USN-8561-1
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-57158?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-57158 published?
Is CVE-2026-57158 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-57158?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-57158?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-57158
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-57158?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.