FreeRDP is a free implementation of the Remote Desktop Protocol. Prior to 3.27.0, FreeRDP clients that negotiate RDPGFX AVC444 with an H.264 decoder backend calculate the intermediate YUV444 allocation size in libfreerdp/codec/h264.c with 32-bit multiplication in avc444_ensure_buffer. A malicious RDP server can supply surface dimensions for which piDstStride multiplied by padDstHeight wraps to a small nonzero value, causing winpr_aligned_recalloc to allocate an undersized buffer before YUV420CombineToYUV444 writes using the actual stride and rectangle dimensions. This can cause a client crash and may permit code execution through attacker-influenced heap corruption. This issue is fixed in version 3.27.0.
CVE-2026-55191
“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.
This critical-severity CVE scores 9.8 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 0.8% (56th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
- CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 9.8
- EG Score
- 9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 60EG Risk 60/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity98% × 45%The EG Score, 9.8 of 10.Exploitation40% × 40%EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 0.8%
- EPSS %ILE
- 56th
- KEV
- Not listed
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
August 19, 2026
Last Modified
September 22, 2026
Advisory Details (4)
Auto-updated Oct 14, 2026Heap-buffer-overflow write in AVC444 YUV buffer allocation · Advisory · FreeRDP/FreeRDP · GitHub
https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/security/advisories/GHSA-vx73-w5q6-7jqr3.27.0
Patch available: FreeRDP/FreeRDP 3.27.0
https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/releases/tag/3.27.0Bounds fixes
Fix merged in FreeRDP/FreeRDP PR #12873 on 2026-06-11 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/pull/12873commit 97f40b9e766a (FreeRDP/FreeRDP)
Fix landed in FreeRDP/FreeRDP commit 97f40b9e766a — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/commit/97f40b9e766af375f4e41ac6a3f4397d708d249cPatch Availability(1)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| ubuntu | winpr3-utils (3.30.0+dfsg-0ubuntu0.26.04.1) @ resolute | 2026-10-08 | ubuntu |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(3 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| freerdp2 | 2.10.0+dfsg1-1 ... 2.11.7+dfsg1-6~deb12u1 (13 versions) |
| — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| freerdp3 | 3.15.0+dfsg-2.1 ... 3.31.1+dfsg-1~bpo13+1 (46 versions) |
| — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| freerdp3 | 3.15.0+dfsg-2.1 ... 3.26.0+dfsg-1~bpo13+1 (33 versions) |
| — |
Weakness Classification(2)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
All Vendor Advisories
(1)
Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 15× in last 7d / 130× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 218 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 118 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-14 01:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
- 2026-10-12 22:14 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
- 2026-10-12 15:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 19:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 16:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 14:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
- 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
- 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
- 2026-10-08 07:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-08 07:44 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
- 2026-10-07 10:26 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-07 05:20 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-07 01:17 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 21:21 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 16:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-06 16:58 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
- 2026-10-06 12:26 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 07:57 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 17:44 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-05 17:44 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
- 2026-10-05 13:53 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 09:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 05:36 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 01:45 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 21:24 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 14:41 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 10:23 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 06:31 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 02:41 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 20:48 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 16:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-03 16:55 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
- 2026-10-03 05:28 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 01:37 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 21:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 21:36 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
- 2026-10-02 16:48 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 12:57 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 07:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 03:41 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 22:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-01 22:46 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
- 2026-10-01 13:30 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 09:39 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 05:43 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 01:23 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 20:35 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 20:35 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
- 2026-09-30 08:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 08:43 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-29 15:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
- 2026-09-29 05:58 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-29 02:07 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-28 21:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 21:42 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
- 2026-09-28 11:53 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-28 07:55 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-28 04:03 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-28 00:12 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-27 20:09 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-27 16:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 16:09 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
- 2026-09-27 11:00 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-27 06:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 06:55 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
- 2026-09-25 12:23 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-25 08:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-25 04:42 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-25 00:51 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-24 19:44 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-24 15:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-24 15:42 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
- 2026-09-24 11:40 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-24 07:50 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-24 03:58 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-24 00:05 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-23 20:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-23 20:09 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-23 15:09 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-23 11:18 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-23 07:27 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-23 03:36 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-22 23:45 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-22 19:55 UTCEG score recompute▲ 1.10
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownDebian:13:freerdp3
Same vendor
10 shownubuntu:USN-8561-1
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-55191?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-55191 published?
Is CVE-2026-55191 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-55191?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-55191?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-55191
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-55191?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.