Netty is a network application framework for development of protocol servers and clients. In versions 4.2.0.Final through 4.2.15.Final and prior to 4.1.135.Final, OcspClient does not validate that the CertificateID in an OCSP response matches the requested CertificateID, which can lead to replay attack. OcspClient.validateResponse accepts a legitimately signed GOOD status response for an unrelated certificate issued by the same CA, allowing bypass of revocation checks for another certificate. This issue is fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.
CVE-2026-56820
This critical-severity CVE scores 9.1 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 0.2%, top 87% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 9.1
- EG Score
- 9.1(medium)
- EG Risk
- 57(Track*)EG Risk 57/100SSVC: Track*
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity91% × 45%Exploitation40% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%Action: Watch closely — could escalate to Attend. - EPSS PROB
- 0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 13%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
July 21, 2026
Last Modified
July 30, 2026
Advisory Details (5)
Auto-updated Sep 16, 2026Missing CertificateID Validation in OCSP Response Allows Replay Attacks · Advisory · netty/netty · GitHub
https://github.com/netty/netty/security/advisories/GHSA-272m-gcwp-mpwgnetty-4.2.16.Final
Patch available: netty/netty netty-4.2.16.Final
https://github.com/netty/netty/releases/tag/netty-4.2.16.Finalnetty-4.1.136.Final
Patch available: netty/netty netty-4.1.136.Final
https://github.com/netty/netty/releases/tag/netty-4.1.136.Finalcommit bb2ff68a1fb7 (netty/netty)
Patch available: netty/netty netty-4.1.136.Final (contains commit bb2ff68a1fb7)
https://github.com/netty/netty/commit/bb2ff68a1fb71cb4b0eb9a9e17b66c52aff680c6commit 5b68c61f37aa (netty/netty)
Patch available: netty/netty netty-4.2.16.Final (contains commit 5b68c61f37aa)
https://github.com/netty/netty/commit/5b68c61f37aa4a3045cba624cbea239655c9003bVendor Advisories for CVE-2026-56820(2)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Patch Availability(1)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fixed in / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | netty-handler-ssl-ocsp | 2026-08-13 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(5 across 5 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| netty | 1:4.1.48-10 ... 1:4.1.48-9 (16 versions) | — | — |
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| netty | 1:4.1.48-10 ... 1:4.1.48-9 (12 versions) | — | — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| netty | 1:4.1.48-10 ... 1:4.1.48-16 (8 versions) | — | — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| netty | 1:4.1.48-10 ... 1:4.1.48-16 (7 versions) | — | — |
Maven(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| io.netty:netty-handler-ssl-ocsp | 4.1.100.Final ... 4.1.99.Final (50 versions) | 4.1.136.Final | — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 30× in last 7d / 147× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 225 total refreshes for this CVE.
- 2026-09-15 03:11 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-14 17:06 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-14 11:13 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-14 07:00 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-14 02:47 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-13 22:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-13 18:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-13 18:19 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-13 14:06 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-13 09:53 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-13 05:40 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-13 01:27 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-12 20:59 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-12 16:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-12 16:45 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-12 12:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-12 06:40 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-12 02:20 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-11 22:06 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-11 17:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-11 17:52 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-11 07:31 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-11 03:18 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-10 22:05 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-10 22:05 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-09 09:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-09 09:20 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-08 01:57 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-07 21:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-07 21:44 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-06 17:30 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-06 17:30 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-06 12:59 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-06 08:46 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-06 04:01 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-05 23:48 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-05 19:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-05 19:36 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-05 07:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-05 07:17 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-04 14:00 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-04 14:00 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-04 05:07 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-01 23:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-01 23:42 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-31 07:55 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-31 03:21 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-30 23:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-30 23:08 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-30 18:55 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-30 14:42 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-30 10:27 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-30 05:12 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-30 05:12 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-30 00:59 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-30 00:59 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-28 01:33 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-27 21:10 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-27 14:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-27 14:46 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-27 10:20 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-27 04:55 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-27 00:12 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-26 19:59 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-26 19:59 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-26 12:43 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-26 08:13 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-26 03:59 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-25 23:46 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-25 19:33 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-25 15:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-25 15:20 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-25 11:08 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-25 06:55 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-25 02:41 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-24 22:28 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-24 18:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-24 18:16 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-24 12:10 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-24 12:10 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-24 07:44 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-24 03:31 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-23 22:57 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-23 18:33 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-23 14:20 UTCVendor advisory
Related CVEs(same vendor + same CWE)
Same vendor
10 shownredhat
- CVE-2001-0825EG 10.0HIGH
- CVE-2001-1009EG 10.0EPSS p93HIGH
- CVE-2001-0554EG 10.0EPSS p98HIGH
- CVE-2001-1162EG 10.0EPSS p96HIGH
- CVE-2001-0414EG 10.0EPSS p100HIGH
- CVE-2001-0191EG 10.0EPSS p92HIGH
- CVE-2001-0301EG 10.0EPSS p91HIGH
- CVE-2001-0197EG 10.0EPSS p96HIGH
- CVE-2001-0233EG 10.0EPSS p96HIGH
- CVE-2001-0010EG 10.0EPSS p98HIGH
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-295
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-56820?
When was CVE-2026-56820 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-56820 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-56820?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-56820?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-56820
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-56820?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.