Netty is a network application framework for development of protocol servers and clients. Prior to 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, io.netty.handler.codec.stomp.StompSubframeDecoder fails to limit the total number of headers or their cumulative size per frame, and the maxLineLength parameter only restricts individual header lines. An attacker can send a large number of short headers that are accumulated in memory inside DefaultStompHeadersSubframe until the JVM throws an OutOfMemoryError, causing denial of service for servers exposing a STOMP endpoint based on StompSubframeDecoder. This issue is fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.
CVE-2026-44891
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
This high-severity CVE scores 7.5 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.7% (52nd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
- CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 7.5
- EG Score
- 7.5HIGHmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 65EG Risk 65/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity75% × 45%The EG Score, 7.5 of 10.Exploitation40% × 40%EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 0.7%
- EPSS %ILE
- 52nd
- KEV
- Not listed
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
July 14, 2026
Last Modified
July 23, 2026
Advisory Details (7)
Auto-updated Jul 17, 2026Denial of Service via Unbounded Headers in StompSubframeDecoder · Advisory · netty/netty · GitHub
https://github.com/netty/netty/security/advisories/GHSA-vhch-2wf3-m8rpnetty-4.2.16.Final
Patch available: netty/netty netty-4.2.16.Final
https://github.com/netty/netty/releases/tag/netty-4.2.16.Finalnetty-4.1.136.Final
Patch available: netty/netty netty-4.1.136.Final
https://github.com/netty/netty/releases/tag/netty-4.1.136.FinalMerge branches from forks (#17063)
Patch available: netty/netty netty-4.1.136.Final (PR #17065 merged 2026-07-08)
https://github.com/netty/netty/pull/17065Merge branches from forks
Patch available: netty/netty netty-4.2.16.Final (PR #17063 merged 2026-07-06)
https://github.com/netty/netty/pull/17063commit bb2ff68a1fb7 (netty/netty)
Patch available: netty/netty netty-4.1.136.Final (contains commit bb2ff68a1fb7)
https://github.com/netty/netty/commit/bb2ff68a1fb71cb4b0eb9a9e17b66c52aff680c6commit 5b68c61f37aa (netty/netty)
Patch available: netty/netty netty-4.2.16.Final (contains commit 5b68c61f37aa)
https://github.com/netty/netty/commit/5b68c61f37aa4a3045cba624cbea239655c9003bVendor Advisories for CVE-2026-44891(3)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- RHSA-2026:69296Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Data Grid 8.6.3 security update
- RHSA-2026:54622Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Build of Apache Camel 4.18.3 for Spring Boot release.
- GHSA-vhch-2wf3-m8rpGitHub Security AdvisoriesHigh
Netty: Denial of Service via Unbounded Headers in StompSubframeDecoder
Patch Availability(1)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | netty-codec-stomp | 2026-09-21 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(5 across 5 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| netty | 1:4.1.48-10 ... 1:4.1.48-9 (16 versions) |
| — |
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| netty | 1:4.1.48-10 ... 1:4.1.48-9 (12 versions) |
| — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| netty | 1:4.1.48-10 ... 1:4.1.48-16 (8 versions) |
| — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| netty | 1:4.1.48-10 ... 1:4.1.48-16 (7 versions) |
| — |
Maven(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| io.netty:netty-codec-stomp | 4.1.0.Beta1 ... 4.1.99.Final (151 versions) |
| — |
Weakness Classification(2)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 11× in last 7d / 35× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 170 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 70 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-10-12 16:04 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 19:47 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 17:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 14:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-10-01 12:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-01 12:50 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-09-28 08:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 08:52 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-09-24 08:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-24 08:58 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-23 17:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
- 2026-09-23 03:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-23 03:26 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
- 2026-09-18 04:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 04:49 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-17 19:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
- 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
- 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-09-14 10:24 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-13 23:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-13 23:15 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-09-13 07:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-13 07:29 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-12 15:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-09-12 13:07 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-11 21:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-11 21:52 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-09-11 09:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-09-08 01:04 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-08 01:04 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:31 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-05 20:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-05 20:55 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-08-31 03:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-31 03:02 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-08-30 16:09 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-30 04:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-30 04:08 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-08-27 23:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-27 23:54 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-08-27 12:52 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-26 23:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-26 23:17 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-08-26 12:11 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-25 23:59 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-25 23:59 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-08-25 12:34 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-25 01:35 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-24 14:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-24 14:43 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-24 03:47 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-23 15:30 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-23 04:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-23 04:38 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-08-22 17:45 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-22 06:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-22 06:53 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-08-21 20:00 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-21 09:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-21 09:08 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-08-20 22:16 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-20 11:17 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-20 00:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-20 00:24 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownMaven:io.netty:netty-codec-stomp · Debian:11:netty
Same vendor
10 shownredhat:RHSA-2026:54622 · redhat:RHSA-2026:69296
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-44891?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-44891 published?
Is CVE-2026-44891 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-44891?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-44891?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-44891
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-44891?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.