CVE-2026-48858

MEDIUMNVD 6.56.5—
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

This medium-severity CVE scores 6.5 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 0.2%, top 86% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: epss, nvd
Trending — 3 sources updated this week
6.5
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: 0%CVSS: 6.5Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Erlang/OTP ftp (ftp_internal module) allows FTP bounce attacks and SSRF via an unvalidated PASV response IP address.

The ftp_internal:handle_ctrl_result/2 PASV handler (mode=passive, ipfamily=inet, ftp_extension=false) extracts the IP address from the server's 227 response and passes it directly to gen_tcp:connect/4 without validating it against the control connection peer address. The adjacent EPSV handlers correctly call peername(CSock) to derive the IP from the control connection, but the PASV handler does not. A malicious or compromised FTP server can redirect the client's data connection to an arbitrary internal host and port. On read operations (ftp:ls/1,2, ftp:nlist/1,2, ftp:recv/2,3), data from the redirected target is returned to the caller. On write operations (ftp:send/2,3, ftp:append/2,3), file content is sent to the redirected target. This enables SSRF against internal hosts, cloud metadata endpoints, and FTP bounce attacks against third-party hosts.

The vulnerable path is the default configuration (mode=passive, ipfamily=inet, ftp_extension=false). RFC 2577 section 3 explicitly recommends validating the PASV response IP against the control connection peer.

The ftp application is deprecated and scheduled for removal in OTP-30.

This vulnerability is associated with program files lib/inets/src/ftp/ftp_internal.erl (inets 5.10.4 through 6.5, OTP 17.4 through 20.3) and lib/ftp/src/ftp_internal.erl (ftp 1.0 and later, OTP 21.0 and later).

This issue affects OTP from OTP 17.4 before 29.0.2, 28.5.0.2 and 27.3.4.13 corresponding to inets from 5.10.4 before 7.0 and ftp from 1.0 before 1.2.6, 1.2.4.1 and 1.2.3.1.

CVSS v3
6.5
EG Score
6.5(medium)
EPSS
14.3%
KEV
Not listed

Published

June 10, 2026

Last Modified

June 11, 2026

Advisory Details (6)

Auto-updated Jun 12, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github_commit, github.
generic

Versions — Erlang System Documentation v29.0.2

https://www.erlang.org/doc/system/versions.html#order-of-versions
generic

OSV - Open Source Vulnerabilities

https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-48858
github Patch Available

FTP Client PASV Response IP not Validated Against Control Peer, Enabling SSRF and FTP Bounce Attacks · Advisory · erlang/otp · GitHub

https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-24cv-hwgr-37fq
github_commit

commit 521bcfa24407 (erlang/otp)

Fix landed in erlang/otp commit 521bcfa24407 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/erlang/otp/commit/521bcfa24407ee8cb5614823cf905c37ea3aa605
github_commit

commit 2691a806231f (erlang/otp)

Fix landed in erlang/otp commit 2691a806231f — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/erlang/otp/commit/2691a806231ffd0490a8a9e20500dec0c7e73727
generic

ftp client PASV response IP not validated against control peer, enabling SSRF and FTP bounce attacks | Erlang Ecosystem Foundation CNA

https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-48858.html

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-48858(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 17× in last 7d / 79× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-05 20:12 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-07-05 20:12 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-07-05 02:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-04 20:16 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-07-04 20:16 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-07-03 20:19 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-07-03 20:19 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-07-02 20:23 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-07-02 20:23 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-07-01 20:28 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-07-01 20:28 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-07-01 15:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-30 20:32 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-06-30 20:32 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-06-29 20:32 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-06-29 20:32 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-28 20:36 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-06-28 20:36 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-28 04:56 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 54 more
  1. 2026-06-28 04:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-06-27 20:40 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-06-27 20:40 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-06-26 20:44 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-06-26 20:44 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-06-25 20:49 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-06-25 20:49 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-06-24 20:52 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-06-24 20:52 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-06-24 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-06-23 21:33 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-06-23 21:33 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-06-23 20:57 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-06-23 20:57 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-06-22 20:40 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-06-22 20:40 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-21 20:38 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-06-21 20:38 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-20 20:37 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-06-20 20:37 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-06-19 19:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-19 19:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-19 18:19 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-06-19 18:19 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-06-18 18:18 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-17 17:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-17 17:03 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-06-16 17:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-16 17:04 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-06-15 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-15 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-15 17:07 UTCEG score recompute
  43. 2026-06-14 23:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-14 17:06 UTCEG score recompute
  45. 2026-06-13 23:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-13 17:09 UTCEG score recompute
  47. 2026-06-12 23:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-12 23:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-12 17:10 UTCEG score recompute▲ 0.20
  50. 2026-06-11 19:56 UTCNVD updateCVSS v3 → 6.5
  51. 2026-06-11 17:14 UTCEG score recompute
  52. 2026-06-11 14:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-10 17:18 UTCEG score recompute
  54. 2026-06-10 17:18 UTCNVD updatefirst tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-48858?
CVE-2026-48858 is a medium vulnerability published on June 10, 2026. Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Erlang/OTP ftp (ftp_internal module) allows FTP bounce attacks and SSRF via an unvalidated PASV response IP address. The ftpinternal:handlectrlresult/2 PASV handler (mode=passive, ipfamily=inet, ftpextension=false) extracts the IP address from the…
When was CVE-2026-48858 disclosed?
CVE-2026-48858 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on June 10, 2026, with the most recent update on June 11, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-48858 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-48858 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 14.3% percentile likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days — higher percentiles indicate greater predicted risk.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-48858?
CVE-2026-48858 has a CVSS v3 base score of 6.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-48858?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-48858, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-48858

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-48858?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.

Start Free Scan →Browse All CVEs