OpenReception's appointment booking software provides an end-to-end encrypted appointment booking platform. Prior to version 1.0.1, a fully provisioned OpenReception instance accepts unauthenticated POST requests to /setup/create-admin-account and creates additional GLOBAL_ADMIN accounts without verifying that an admin already exists. Any unauthenticated network attacker who can submit a same-origin form POST gains full platform-level administrative control. The newly created account is is_active=true with confirmation_state=ACCESS_GRANTED and does not require completing email confirmation; the GLOBAL_ADMIN row is created active and immediately usable. Login and tenant enumeration succeed without any further interaction. This is distinct from the deployment race condition already documented on the Claiming an instance page. That documented race covers the window between deployment and first claim. The bug reported here works after the operator has properly claimed and configured the instance: the layout-level guard that protects the setup page only redirects on GET, while the default form action handler creates the user without rechecking adminExists(). Three GLOBAL_ADMIN accounts were created in succession during testing, with no rate limiting observed. Audit-specific event logging beyond standard application logs was not assessed; the standard [error] line that surfaces only when a uniqueness conflict is hit is not the same as a security event for "additional admin created post-claim". The form post is rejected for browser drive-by CSRF by SvelteKit's built-in same-origin check, but any tool that supplies a matching Origin header (curl, Burp, automated scanners, server-side proxies) bypasses this trivially. No additional preconditions exist. Users should upgrade to version 1.0.1 to receive a patch.
CVE-2026-48085
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
This critical-severity CVE scores 9.8 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.6% (46th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
- CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 9.8
- EG Score
- 9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 75EG Risk 75/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity98% × 45%The EG Score, 9.8 of 10.Exploitation40% × 40%EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 0.6%
- EPSS %ILE
- 46th
- KEV
- Not listed
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
August 6, 2026
Last Modified
September 8, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Oct 7, 2026unauthenticated GLOBAL_ADMIN account creation post-bootstrap · Advisory · open-reception/appointment-booking-software · GitHub
https://github.com/open-reception/appointment-booking-software/security/advisories/GHSA-qvvq-hhpj-64rpcommit 222408af6fd4 (open-reception/appointment-booking-software)
Patch available: open-reception/appointment-booking-software v1.0.1 (contains commit 222408af6fd4)
https://github.com/open-reception/appointment-booking-software/commit/222408af6fd4bd85554a25ec8de8131bd0733797Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 13× in last 7d / 48× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 120 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 20 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-14 09:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-10-13 06:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-10-12 16:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 19:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 16:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 14:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-10-06 23:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-10-05 18:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-10-05 08:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-10-04 05:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-10-03 01:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 09:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-09-30 22:59 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-09-29 05:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-09-27 17:13 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-09-26 00:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-09-25 04:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-23 21:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-23 17:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-09-22 21:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-22 00:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-20 20:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-09-19 17:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 22:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-09-18 00:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-17 00:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-09-16 06:31 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-09-15 06:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-13 17:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-09-12 15:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-11 18:06 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-09-11 14:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-10 09:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-09-09 06:04 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-09-07 17:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-09-06 14:00 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-09-05 16:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-04 16:47 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-04 09:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-09-03 06:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-09-01 17:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-09-01 07:10 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-30 22:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-08-30 04:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-08-29 10:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-08-27 15:07 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-08-26 18:59 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-08-25 16:31 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-08-24 15:04 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-24 11:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-23 02:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-08-22 01:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-08-21 00:03 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-08-19 18:48 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-08-18 15:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-08-17 14:57 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-08-16 17:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-08-16 02:48 UTCEG score recompute
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-48085?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-48085 published?
Is CVE-2026-48085 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-48085?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-48085?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-48085
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-48085?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.