OpenReception's appointment booking software provides an end-to-end encrypted appointment booking platform. Prior to version 1.0.5, the add-to-tunnel endpoint creates a new appointment row in any client tunnel without any caller authentication. A request that supplies any valid tunnelId and any valid emailHash (the two need not belong to the same tunnel) results in an inserted appointment with status = "CONFIRMED", attacker-controlled ciphertext fields, attacker-controlled date and duration, and an attacker-chosen agent. The endpoint validates only that some tunnel exists with the given emailHash, then writes the appointment using the attacker-supplied tunnelId directly. The emailHash lookup is effectively an existence check on the tenant; it does not authenticate the caller as the owner of the supplied tunnelId. Combined with the absence of any session, Authorization header, booking access token, or PoW, this makes the endpoint accept arbitrary appointment writes into arbitrary tunnels. By contrast, the sibling endpoint create-new-client (used to bootstrap a brand-new client tunnel) requires a Bearer bootstrap booking access token issued by the bootstrap-challenge / bootstrap-verify flow. The add-to-tunnel endpoint, intended for return-clients booking additional appointments, has no equivalent gate. The application's own middleware confirms this is intentional: add-to-tunnel is explicitly listed in the apiAuthHandle public-route allowlist alongside the bootstrap and challenge endpoints (which legitimately have no session). Version 1.0.5 fixes the issue.
CVE-2026-48075
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
This medium-severity CVE scores 6.5 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.4% (34th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
- CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 6.5
- EG Score
- 6.5MEDIUMmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 45EG Risk 45/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity65% × 45%The EG Score, 6.5 of 10.Exploitation40% × 40%EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 0.4%
- EPSS %ILE
- 34th
- KEV
- Not listed
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
August 6, 2026
Last Modified
September 8, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Aug 6, 2026unauthenticated add-to-tunnel endpoint accepts arbitrary appointment injections · Advisory · open-reception/appointment-booking-software · GitHub
https://github.com/open-reception/appointment-booking-software/security/advisories/GHSA-rhp5-vmcx-4qm8commit 4522a44c0017 (open-reception/appointment-booking-software)
Patch available: open-reception/appointment-booking-software v1.0.5 (contains commit 4522a44c0017)
https://github.com/open-reception/appointment-booking-software/commit/4522a44c001782848faff5529d7c1e2be7ac9ef5Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 11× in last 7d / 43× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 106 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 6 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-10-12 16:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 19:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 16:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 14:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-10-06 23:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-10-05 08:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-10-04 05:47 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-10-02 09:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-09-30 22:59 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-09-29 05:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-09-27 17:27 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-09-26 00:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-09-25 04:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-23 21:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-23 17:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-09-22 15:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-21 13:12 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-09-20 10:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-19 05:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-09-18 03:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-17 00:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-09-15 14:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-14 11:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-09-13 09:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-12 06:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-09-11 04:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-09-10 02:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-09-07 17:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-05 11:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-04 09:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-09-03 06:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-09-02 00:48 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-08-31 22:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-08-30 12:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-08-29 10:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-08-27 12:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-08-26 10:12 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-08-25 07:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-23 02:48 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-08-22 00:35 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-08-19 20:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-08-18 17:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-08-17 14:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-08-16 12:12 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-08-15 10:00 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-08-14 07:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-08-13 05:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-08-12 03:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-11 01:06 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-08-09 22:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-08-08 20:41 UTCEG score recompute
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-48075?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-48075 published?
Is CVE-2026-48075 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-48075?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-48075?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-48075
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-48075?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.