CVE-2026-48077

MEDIUMPre-NVD 5.35.3
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

This medium-severity CVE scores 5.3 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.4% (35th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from a secondary CVSS source
Sources: EPSS, a secondary CVSS source
Elevated
5.3EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.4%CVSS: 5.3Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

OpenReception's appointment booking software provides an end-to-end encrypted appointment booking platform. Prior to version 1.1.0, the GET handler at /api/tenants/{id}/appointments/{appointmentId} performs no authorization check before returning the appointment record. Any party who knows or obtains a valid appointment UUID receives the full row, including channel and agent IDs, time and timezone, status, and the AES-GCM ciphertext components (encryptedPayload, iv, authTag, dataKey). The same file's DELETE handler calls checkPermission(locals, tenantId, true) before allowing deletion. The intent is clear: appointment records are tenant-scoped and require authentication to access. The GET handler is missing the equivalent call. The middleware chain (apiAuthHandle, authGuard) does not compensate: API paths bypass authGuard entirely, and apiAuthHandle does not block requests to non-admin paths when no token is present. Version 1.1.0 patches the issue.

CVSS v3
5.3
EG Score
5.3MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
55
EG Risk 55/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity53% × 45%
The EG Score, 5.3 of 10.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.4%
EPSS %ILE
35th
KEV
Not listed

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

August 6, 2026

Last Modified

September 8, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Aug 6, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github_commit, github.
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

GET appointment by ID returns full appointment record without authorization · Advisory · open-reception/appointment-booking-software · GitHub

https://github.com/open-reception/appointment-booking-software/security/advisories/GHSA-8547-9x2c-9vmf
GitHub commit Patch Available

commit 16474d96c591 (open-reception/appointment-booking-software)

Patch available: open-reception/appointment-booking-software v1.1.0 (contains commit 16474d96c591)

https://github.com/open-reception/appointment-booking-software/commit/16474d96c591e246a103b9d6aa15ca30d436d11b

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 11× in last 7d / 43× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 109 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 9 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  2. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  3. 2026-10-12 16:01 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-11 19:44 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-11 16:58 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-11 14:23 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  8. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  9. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  10. 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  11. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  12. 2026-10-06 23:22 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  14. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  15. 2026-10-05 08:21 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  17. 2026-10-04 05:47 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  19. 2026-10-02 09:36 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  21. 2026-09-30 22:59 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  23. 2026-09-29 05:51 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  25. 2026-09-27 17:27 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  2. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  3. 2026-09-26 00:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  4. 2026-09-25 04:19 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-09-24 03:01 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-09-23 17:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  7. 2026-09-23 01:58 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-09-22 00:55 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-09-20 21:19 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  11. 2026-09-19 20:15 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  13. 2026-09-18 17:35 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-09-17 15:12 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  16. 2026-09-16 11:11 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  18. 2026-09-15 07:24 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-09-14 06:21 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  21. 2026-09-13 05:18 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-09-12 04:15 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  24. 2026-09-11 03:12 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  26. 2026-09-10 02:08 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
  28. 2026-09-07 17:50 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
  30. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
  31. 2026-09-06 11:17 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-09-05 10:11 UTCEG score recompute
  33. 2026-09-04 09:08 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
  35. 2026-09-03 06:11 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
  37. 2026-09-01 23:36 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  39. 2026-08-31 22:32 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  41. 2026-08-30 11:31 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  43. 2026-08-29 10:28 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  45. 2026-08-27 14:46 UTCEG score recompute
  46. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  47. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  48. 2026-08-26 13:43 UTCEG score recompute
  49. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  50. 2026-08-25 12:41 UTCEG score recompute
  51. 2026-08-24 11:38 UTCEG score recompute
  52. 2026-08-23 10:35 UTCEG score recompute
  53. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
  54. 2026-08-22 09:32 UTCEG score recompute
  55. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
  56. 2026-08-21 08:29 UTCEG score recompute
  57. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
  58. 2026-08-20 07:26 UTCEG score recompute
  59. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
  60. 2026-08-19 06:23 UTCEG score recompute
  61. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
  62. 2026-08-18 04:54 UTCEG score recompute
  63. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
  64. 2026-08-17 03:52 UTCEG score recompute
  65. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
  66. 2026-08-16 02:49 UTCEG score recompute
  67. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
  68. 2026-08-15 01:46 UTCEG score recompute
  69. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
  70. 2026-08-14 00:43 UTCEG score recompute
  71. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
  72. 2026-08-12 23:40 UTCEG score recompute
  73. 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
  74. 2026-08-11 22:37 UTCEG score recompute
  75. 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile

Related CVEs(same CWE)

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-48077?
CVE-2026-48077 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on August 6, 2026. OpenReception's appointment booking software provides an end-to-end encrypted appointment booking platform. Prior to version 1.1.0, the GET handler at /api/tenants/{id}/appointments/{appointmentId} performs no authorization check before returning the appointment record. Any party who knows or…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-48077 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-48077 was published on August 6, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of September 8, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-48077 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-48077 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.4% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (35th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-48077?
CVE-2026-48077 has a CVSS base score of 5.3 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-48077?
A fix for CVE-2026-48077 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-48077

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-48077?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.

Book a Demo →Browse All CVEs