node-tar,a Tar for Node.js, contains a vulnerability in versions prior to 7.5.7 where the security check for hardlink entries uses different path resolution semantics than the actual hardlink creation logic. This mismatch allows an attacker to craft a malicious TAR archive that bypasses path traversal protections and creates hardlinks to arbitrary files outside the extraction directory. Version 7.5.7 contains a fix for the issue.
CVE-2026-24842
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
This high-severity CVE scores 8.2 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.6% (48th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
- CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 8.2
- EG Score
- 8.2HIGHmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 53EG Risk 53/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity82% × 45%The EG Score, 8.2 of 10.Exploitation40% × 40%EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 0.6%
- EPSS %ILE
- 48th
- KEV
- Not listed
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
January 28, 2026
Last Modified
September 7, 2026
Advisory Details (10)
Auto-updated Jun 30, 20262433645 – (CVE-2026-24842) CVE-2026-24842 node-tar: tar: node-tar: Arbitrary file creation via path traversal bypass in hardlink security check
Affected: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2433645cve-details
https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-24842Affected: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7. Red Hat Product Security has rated this update as having a security impact of Important. A Common
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:33371Affected: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:18868Affected: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10.
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:18480Arbitrary File Read/Overwrite via Hardlink Path Traversal in node-tar · Advisory · isaacs/node-tar · GitHub
https://github.com/isaacs/node-tar/security/advisories/GHSA-34x7-hfp2-rc4vcommit f4a7aa9bc3d7 (isaacs/node-tar)
Fix landed in isaacs/node-tar commit f4a7aa9bc3d7 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/isaacs/node-tar/commit/f4a7aa9bc3d717c987fdf1480ff7a64e87ffdb46Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-24842(6)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- RHSA-2026:33371Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.3.18 security update
- RHSA-2026:18868Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: linux-sgx security update
- RHSA-2026:18480Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: linux-sgx security update
- RHSA-2026:6192Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces 3.27.0 Release.
- RHSA-2026:5447Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: RHTAS 1.3.3 - Red Hat Trusted Artifact Signer Release
- RHSA-2026:2900Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Network Observability 1.11.0 for OpenShift
Patch Availability(6)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | eap7-wildfly-0:7.3.18-3.GA_redhat_00001.1.el7eap | 2026-06-30 | redhat |
| redhat | linux-sgx-0:2.26-7.el10 | 2026-05-19 | redhat |
| redhat | linux-sgx-0:2.26-7.el9 | 2026-05-19 | redhat |
| redhat | devspaces/dashboard-rhel9:1774476526 | 2026-03-30 | redhat |
| redhat | rhtas/rekor-search-ui-rhel9:1773308315 | 2026-03-23 | redhat |
| redhat | network-observability/network-observability-console-plugin-rhel9:1771227650 | 2026-02-18 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(3 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| node-tar | 6.0.5+ds1+~cs11.3.9-1, 6.0.5+ds1+~cs11.3.9-1+deb11u1, 6.0.5+ds1+~cs11.3.9-1+deb11u2 |
| — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| node-tar | 6.2.1+ds1+~cs6.1.13-1 ... 6.2.1+~cs7.0.8-1 (10 versions) |
| — |
npm(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| tar | — |
| — |
Weakness Classification(2)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 11× in last 7d / 30× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 99 of 219 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 1 repeat row among the latest 100 is merged into the row it repeats. The 120 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-15 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-10-14 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-10-13 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-10-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-10-12 16:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 20:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 17:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 14:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-10-08 17:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-10-04 23:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-09-29 15:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-09-27 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-09-27 04:45 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-09-26 00:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
Show 74 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-24 14:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-09-18 19:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-09-16 14:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
- 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
- 2026-09-12 15:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
- 2026-09-11 14:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
- 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
- 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
- 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
- 2026-09-07 14:06 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-07 14:06 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
- 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-09-02 14:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-09-01 13:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-09-01 12:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-01 12:25 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-01 04:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-08-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-08-24 13:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-24 13:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-24 12:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-24 12:28 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-08-21 12:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-21 12:33 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-08-17 12:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-17 12:22 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-17 12:14 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-17 12:14 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-08-14 23:21 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-14 12:07 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-14 12:07 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-08-13 04:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-13 04:11 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-12 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-08-11 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-08-10 13:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-10 13:22 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-10 12:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-10 12:27 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-10 10:23 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-09 17:07 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-09 17:07 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-08-07 23:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-07 23:22 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-08-06 04:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-06 04:51 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-08-04 15:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-08-03 13:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-03 13:44 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-03 12:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-03 12:50 UTCVendor advisory
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownDebian:11:node-tar
Same vendor
10 shownredhat:RHSA-2026:18480 · redhat:RHSA-2026:5447 · redhat:RHSA-2026:2900
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-24842?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-24842 published?
Is CVE-2026-24842 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-24842?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-24842?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-24842
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-24842?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.