undici's retry interceptor can append the body of a ranged retry response to bytes already delivered from an earlier partial response while still presenting the original response's status and headers. This happens when an upstream server delivers part of a body without a trustworthy resume checkpoint, for example a non-success response whose headers were already sent or a partial-content response with an unusable content range, then closes the connection and answers the resumed range request with more bytes. As a result the response body can be longer than the Content-Length that the application observes. An application that relays such a response to a downstream HTTP/1.1 peer without normalizing the framing can emit a body that exceeds the forwarded Content-Length, and the excess bytes can be interpreted as the start of a following response, which enables downstream response splitting or desynchronization. Exploitation requires an attacker-controlled upstream server and an application that forwards the response through a framing-sensitive path. This affects undici versions before 6.28.1, from 7.0.0 up to 7.29.1, and from 8.0.0 up to 8.10.2. Users should upgrade to undici 6.28.1, 7.29.1, or 8.10.2.
CVE-2026-18540
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
This low-severity CVE scores 3.7 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.3% (23rd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
Also known asEUVD-2026-71661 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-r53p-7pc4-xj5r (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 3.7
- EG Score
- 3.7LOWmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 17EG Risk 17/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity37% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 3.7 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation0.2% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 0.3%
- EPSS %ILE
- 23rd
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (3.7): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 3.7 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 3.7 LOWCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.a secondary CVSS source · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
- EG Likelihood
- 0.3% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS. FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
September 4, 2026
Last Modified
September 16, 2026
References (2)
- https://cna.openjsf.org/security-advisories.htmlVendor Advisory
- https://github.com/nodejs/undici/security/advisories/GHSA-r53p-7pc4-xj5rMitigation · Vendor Advisory
Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-18540(5)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- GHSA-r53p-7pc4-xj5rGitHub Security AdvisoriesLow
undici vulnerable to downstream response splitting via retry interceptor
- RHSA-2026:71017Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs bug fix and enhancement update
- CVE-2026-18540Microsoft Security Response Center (MSRC)Low
undici vulnerable to downstream response splitting via retry interceptor
- RHSA-2026:66605Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs bug fix and enhancement update
- RHSA-2026:66008Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs bug fix and enhancement update
Patch Availability(3)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | nodejs24-main-11.19.0-1.24.21.0.1.hum1 | 2026-09-23 | redhat |
| redhat | nodejs26-main-11.19.1-1.26.8.2.0.1.hum1 | 2026-09-11 | redhat |
| redhat | grafana12-4-main-12.4.10-0.2.hum1 | 2026-09-09 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| node-undici | 5.15.0+dfsg1+~cs20.10.9.3-1 ... 8.9.0+dfsg+~cs3.2.0-1 (40 versions) |
| — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| node-undici | 7.15.0+dfsg+~cs3.2.0-1 ... 8.9.0+dfsg+~cs3.2.0-1 (16 versions) |
| — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| node-undici | 7.15.0+dfsg+~cs3.2.0-1 ... 8.9.0+dfsg+~cs3.2.0-1 (15 versions) |
| — |
npm(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| undici | — |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 46× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
- 2026-10-27 04:55 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
- 2026-10-25 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
- 2026-10-25 14:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
- 2026-10-23 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
- 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
- 2026-10-21 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
- 2026-10-20 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
- 2026-10-19 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
- 2026-10-18 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
- 2026-10-18 03:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
- 2026-10-16 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
- 2026-10-15 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
- 2026-10-14 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
- 2026-10-13 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
- 2026-10-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
- 2026-10-12 16:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 20:07 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 17:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 14:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
- 2026-10-10 19:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
Show 51 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-09 01:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-09 01:41 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-08 17:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
- 2026-10-06 07:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-06 07:24 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 17:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
- 2026-10-04 23:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
- 2026-10-03 13:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-03 13:09 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
- 2026-09-30 18:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 18:53 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
- 2026-09-29 15:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
- 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
- 2026-09-27 22:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 22:21 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-27 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
- 2026-09-25 04:05 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-25 04:05 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-22 09:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-22 09:50 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-19 15:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-19 15:33 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-18 19:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
- 2026-09-16 21:10 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 21:10 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-16 14:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
- 2026-09-16 05:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
- 2026-09-14 08:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-14 08:28 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-13 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
- 2026-09-12 15:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
- 2026-09-11 14:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-09-11 14:12 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-11 14:12 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-11 09:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-09-08 19:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-09-07 14:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-09-04 18:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-04 17:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-04 17:20 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 3.7 LOW
- 2026-09-04 17:19 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownDebian:12:node-undici
Same vendor
10 shownredhat:RHSA-2026:66008 · redhat:RHSA-2026:66605
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-18540?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-18540 published?
Is CVE-2026-18540 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-18540?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-18540?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-18540
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-18540?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.