Tornado is a Python web framework and asynchronous networking library. In versions 6.5.2 and below, a single maliciously crafted HTTP request can block the server's event loop for an extended period, caused by the HTTPHeaders.add method. The function accumulates values using string concatenation when the same header name is repeated, causing a Denial of Service (DoS). Due to Python string immutability, each concatenation copies the entire string, resulting in O(n²) time complexity. The severity can vary from high if max_header_size has been increased from its default, to low if it has its default value of 64KB. This issue is fixed in version 6.5.3.
CVE-2025-67725
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
This high-severity CVE scores 7.5 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.6% (45th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 7.5
- EG Score
- 7.5HIGHmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 49EG Risk 49/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity75% × 45%The EG Score, 7.5 of 10.Exploitation0.6% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 0.6%
- EPSS %ILE
- 45th
- KEV
- Not listed
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
December 12, 2025
Last Modified
October 7, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Aug 8, 2026Quadratic DoS via Repeated Header Coalescing · Advisory · tornadoweb/tornado · GitHub
https://github.com/tornadoweb/tornado/security/advisories/GHSA-c98p-7wgm-6p64commit 771472cfdaee (tornadoweb/tornado)
Fix landed in tornadoweb/tornado commit 771472cfdaee — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/tornadoweb/tornado/commit/771472cfdaeebc0d89a9cc46e249f8891a6b29cdVendor Advisories for CVE-2025-67725(8)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- GHSA-c98p-7wgm-6p64GitHub Security AdvisoriesHigh
Tornado: Quadratic DoS via Repeated Header Coalescing
- RHSA-2026:3713Red Hat Product SecurityCritical
Red Hat Security Advisory: RHOAI 3.3 - Red Hat OpenShift AI
- RHSA-2026:2484Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: pcs security update
- RHSA-2026:2469Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: pcs security update
- RHSA-2026:2465Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: pcs security update
- RHSA-2026:2462Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: pcs security update
- RHSA-2026:2106Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: RHOAI 2.25.2 - Red Hat OpenShift AI
- RHSA-2026:0930Red Hat Product SecurityMedium
Red Hat Security Advisory: pcs security update
Patch Availability(8)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| ubuntu | python3-tornado (4.2.1-1ubuntu3.1+esm2) @ xenial | 2026-10-07 | ubuntu |
| redhat | rhoai/odh-workbench-jupyter-trustyai-cpu-py312-rhel9:1771874181 | 2026-03-04 | redhat |
| redhat | pcs-0:0.10.15-4.el8_8.10 | 2026-02-10 | redhat |
| redhat | pcs-0:0.11.1-10.el9_0.10 | 2026-02-10 | redhat |
| redhat | pcs-0:0.10.12-6.el8_6.12 | 2026-02-10 | redhat |
| redhat | pcs-0:0.10.8-1.el8_4.10 | 2026-02-10 | redhat |
| redhat | rhoai/odh-workbench-jupyter-trustyai-cpu-py312-rhel9:1770055425 | 2026-02-05 | redhat |
| redhat | pcs-0:0.10.18-2.el8_10.8 | 2026-01-21 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(5 across 5 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| python-tornado | 6.1.0-1, 6.1.0-1+deb11u1, 6.1.0-1+deb11u2 |
| — |
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| python-tornado | 6.2.0-3, 6.2.0-3+deb12u1, 6.2.0-3+deb12u2, 6.2.0-3+deb12u3 |
| — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| python-tornado | 6.4.2-3, 6.4.2-3+deb13u1 |
| — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| python-tornado | 6.4.2-3, 6.5.2-1, 6.5.2-2, 6.5.2-3 |
| — |
PyPI(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| tornado | 0.2 ... 6.5b1 (78 versions) |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Additional Vendor Advisories
(1)
Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 11× in last 7d / 32× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 93 of 174 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 7 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 81 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-15 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-10-14 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-10-13 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-10-12 16:47 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-10-11 20:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 18:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 15:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-10-10 19:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-10-08 17:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-10-07 20:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-07 20:29 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-10-04 23:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-10-03 18:51 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-09-29 15:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-09-28 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
Show 68 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-24 14:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-09-23 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-09-18 19:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-09-17 19:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-09-16 14:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-09-16 05:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-09-15 03:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-09-14 09:19 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-13 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-09-12 15:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-09-11 14:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-09-11 09:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-09-07 16:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-09-02 14:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-09-01 13:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-08-30 01:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-08-28 21:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-08-27 14:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-08-26 14:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-08-26 10:13 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-08-24 14:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-08-23 00:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-08-21 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-08-17 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-08-16 14:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-08-12 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-08-11 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-08-10 23:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-08-10 00:05 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-10 00:05 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-08-08 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
- 2026-08-08 06:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-08 06:56 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-07 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
- 2026-08-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
- 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
- 2026-08-04 10:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
- 2026-08-03 10:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
- 2026-08-02 02:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
- 2026-08-01 04:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
- 2026-07-30 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
- 2026-07-30 01:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
- 2026-07-27 14:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
- 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
- 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
- 2026-07-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
- 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-07-23 12:49 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-07-23 03:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-07-21 15:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-07-20 17:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownDebian:11:python-tornado
Same vendor
10 shownredhat:RHSA-2026:0930 · redhat:RHSA-2026:2462 · redhat:RHSA-2026:2106
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2025-67725?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2025-67725 published?
Is CVE-2025-67725 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-67725?
How do I remediate CVE-2025-67725?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2025-67725
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-67725?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.