Expr is an expression language and expression evaluation for Go. Prior to version 1.17.7, several builtin functions in Expr, including flatten, min, max, mean, and median, perform recursive traversal over user-provided data structures without enforcing a maximum recursion depth. If the evaluation environment contains deeply nested or cyclic data structures, these functions may recurse indefinitely until exceed the Go runtime stack limit. This results in a stack overflow panic, causing the host application to crash. While exploitability depends on whether an attacker can influence or inject cyclic or pathologically deep data into the
evaluation environment, this behavior represents a denial-of-service (DoS) risk and affects overall library robustness. Instead of returning a recoverable evaluation error, the process may terminate unexpectedly. In affected versions, evaluation of expressions that invoke certain builtin functions on untrusted or insufficiently validated data structures can lead to a process-level crash due to stack exhaustion. This issue is most relevant in scenarios where Expr is used to evaluate expressions against externally supplied or dynamically constructed environments; cyclic references (directly or indirectly) can be introduced into arrays, maps, or structs; and there are no application-level safeguards preventing deeply nested input data. In typical use cases with controlled, acyclic data, the issue may not manifest. However, when present, the resulting panic can be used to reliably crash the application, constituting a denial of service. The issue has been fixed in the v1.17.7 versions of Expr. The patch introduces a maximum recursion depth limit for affected builtin functions. When this limit is exceeded, evaluation aborts gracefully and returns a descriptive error instead of panicking. Additionally, the maximum depth can be customized by users via builtin.MaxDepth, allowing applications with legitimate deep structures to raise the limit in a controlled manner. Users are strongly encouraged to upgrade to the patched release, which includes both the recursion guard and comprehensive test coverage to prevent regressions. For users who cannot immediately upgrade, some mitigations are recommended. Ensure that evaluation environments cannot contain cyclic references, validate or sanitize externally supplied data structures before passing them to Expr, and/or wrap expression evaluation with panic recovery to prevent a full process crash (as a last-resort defensive measure). These workarounds reduce risk but do not fully eliminate the issue without the patch.
CVE-2025-68156
“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.
This high-severity CVE scores 7.5 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 0.4% (35th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 7.5
- EG Score
- 7.5HIGHmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 49EG Risk 49/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity75% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation0.4% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 0.4%
- EPSS %ILE
- 35th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (7.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 7.5 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.NVD CVSS v3 · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
- EG Likelihood
- 0.4% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-19). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
December 16, 2025
Last Modified
October 13, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Aug 6, 2026Denial of Service via Unbounded Recursion in Builtin Functions · Advisory · expr-lang/expr · GitHub
https://github.com/expr-lang/expr/security/advisories/GHSA-cfpf-hrx2-8rv6fix(builtin): limit recursion depth
Patch available: expr-lang/expr v1.17.7 (PR #870 merged 2025-12-04)
https://github.com/expr-lang/expr/pull/870Vendor Advisories for CVE-2025-68156(15)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- RHSA-2026:15979Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Ceph Storage
- RHSA-2026:5807Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: RHOAI 2.16.4 - Red Hat OpenShift AI
- RHSA-2026:3713Red Hat Product SecurityCritical
Red Hat Security Advisory: RHOAI 3.3 - Red Hat OpenShift AI
- RHSA-2026:2695Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: RHOAI 2.25.2 - Red Hat OpenShift AI
- RHSA-2026:2572Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes v2.14.2 security update
- RHSA-2026:2368Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Custom Metrics Autoscaler Operator for Red Hat OpenShift 2.18.1-2 Update
- RHSA-2026:2106Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: RHOAI 2.25.2 - Red Hat OpenShift AI
- RHSA-2026:1018Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat OpenShift GitOps v1.17.4 security update
- +7 more
Patch Availability(14)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | rhceph/grafana-rhel9:1777566546 | 2026-05-11 | redhat |
| redhat | rhoai/odh-ml-pipelines-scheduledworkflow-v2-rhel8:1774282202 | 2026-03-25 | redhat |
| redhat | rhoai/odh-model-controller-rhel9:1771378291 | 2026-03-04 | redhat |
| redhat | rhoai/odh-model-registry-rhel9:1770326269 | 2026-02-12 | redhat |
| redhat | rhacm2/acm-grafana-rhel9:1770632254 | 2026-02-11 | redhat |
| redhat | custom-metrics-autoscaler/custom-metrics-autoscaler-rhel9-operator:1770072020 | 2026-02-09 | redhat |
| redhat | rhoai/odh-model-registry-rhel9:1770240648 | 2026-02-05 | redhat |
| redhat | openshift-gitops-1/argocd-rhel9:1768881228 | 2026-01-22 | redhat |
| redhat | openshift-gitops-1/argocd-rhel9:1768824532 | 2026-01-22 | redhat |
| redhat | opentelemetry-collector-0:0.135.0-2.el9_6 | 2026-01-13 | redhat |
| redhat | opentelemetry-collector-0:0.135.0-2.el10_0 | 2026-01-13 | redhat |
| redhat | opentelemetry-collector-0:0.135.0-2.el9_4 | 2026-01-13 | redhat |
| redhat | opentelemetry-collector-0:0.135.0-2.el9_7 | 2025-12-22 | redhat |
| redhat | opentelemetry-collector-0:0.135.0-2.el10_1 | 2025-12-18 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Go(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| github.com/expr-lang/expr | — |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 36× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 97 of 187 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 3 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 90 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-23 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-10-22 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-10-21 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-10-20 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-10-20 10:00 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-20 10:00 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-19 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-10-18 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-10-18 05:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-10-16 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-10-15 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-10-14 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-10-13 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-10-13 11:27 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-12 16:47 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-10-11 20:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 18:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 15:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-10-10 19:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-10-08 17:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
Show 72 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-10-04 23:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-10-03 17:18 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-09-29 15:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-09-28 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-09-24 14:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-09-23 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
- 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
- 2026-09-18 19:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
- 2026-09-17 19:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-09-16 14:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-09-16 05:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-09-15 03:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-09-14 07:49 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-13 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-09-12 15:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-09-11 14:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-09-11 09:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
- 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
- 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-09-07 16:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-09-02 14:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-09-01 13:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-08-30 01:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-08-28 21:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-08-27 14:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-08-26 14:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-08-26 08:43 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-08-24 14:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-08-23 00:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
- 2026-08-21 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-08-17 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-08-16 14:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-08-12 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-08-11 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-08-10 23:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-08-09 23:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-09 23:33 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-08-08 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-08-08 06:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-08 06:18 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-07 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-08-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-08-06 08:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-06 08:49 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-08-04 10:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-08-03 10:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-08-02 02:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-08-01 04:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-07-30 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-07-30 01:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-07-27 14:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-07-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same vendor
10 shownredhat:RHSA-2026:1017 · redhat:RHSA-2026:2106
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2025-68156?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2025-68156 published?
Is CVE-2025-68156 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-68156?
How do I remediate CVE-2025-68156?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2025-68156
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-68156?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.